Antibiotics to treat abscesses. Antibiotics After Incision and Drainage for Uncomplicated Skin Abscesses: A Clinical Practice Guideline
What are the guidelines for using antibiotics after incision and drainage for uncomplicated skin abscesses? How effective are antibiotics in treating skin abscesses when used in addition to conventional surgical drainage?
The Rise of Community-Acquired MRSA and Increasing Skin Infections
The emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a significant public health concern since the early 2000s. MRSA has now become the most common cause of skin infections, not only in the U.S. but in many other parts of the world as well. This trend has led to a sharp increase in emergency department visits for skin infections, which nearly tripled from 1.2 million to 3.4 million between 1993 and 2005. The burden of such infections has continued to rise since then.
The Effectiveness of Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Skin Abscesses
Traditionally, the standard treatment for uncomplicated skin abscesses has been surgical drainage alone, without the use of antibiotics. However, a growing body of research has challenged this long-held approach, suggesting that the addition of specific antibiotics can significantly improve outcomes.
A 2018 systematic review and network meta-analysis found that antibiotics were effective in treating uncomplicated skin abscesses, with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and clindamycin being particularly effective. Another 2017 placebo-controlled trial showed that antibiotics led to a lower rate of treatment failure and lower rates of subsequent infection compared to placebo.
The UCLA Study: Adding Antibiotics to Conventional Treatment
A recent study led by researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has provided new insights into the benefits of adding antibiotics to the conventional treatment of uncomplicated skin abscesses. The study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that the addition of a specific antibiotic to the surgical drainage of abscesses resulted in fewer recurring infections, fewer infections in other parts of the body, and fewer instances of the infection being passed on to other household members.
According to the lead author, Dr. David Talan, a professor at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and Olive View–UCLA Medical Center, “We found that adding in a specific antibiotic to the medical treatment also resulted in fewer recurring infections, fewer infections in other places on the body and fewer people passing on the infection to other members of the household. This translates into fewer medical visits and reduced health care costs.”
The Clinical Practice Guideline
In 2018, a clinical practice guideline was published in the BMJ, providing recommendations on the use of antibiotics after incision and drainage for uncomplicated skin abscesses. The guideline, developed by an international panel of experts, made the following key recommendations:
- For small, uncomplicated skin abscesses, the panel recommended against the routine use of antibiotics after incision and drainage.
- For larger or more complicated skin abscesses, the panel suggested the use of antibiotics after incision and drainage.
- The panel recommended the use of either trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or clindamycin as the antibiotic of choice.
The Importance of Selective Antibiotic Use
While the research supports the use of antibiotics in certain cases of uncomplicated skin abscesses, it is important to note that the indiscriminate use of antibiotics can contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance. Healthcare providers must carefully weigh the potential benefits and risks when considering the use of antibiotics for the management of skin abscesses.
Improving Outcomes and Reducing Healthcare Costs
The findings of the UCLA study and the 2018 clinical practice guideline suggest that the judicious use of antibiotics, in addition to the conventional surgical drainage of uncomplicated skin abscesses, can lead to better patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. By reducing the risk of recurring infections, secondary infections, and the transmission of the infection to others, this approach has the potential to significantly improve the management of skin abscesses and reduce the burden on the healthcare system.
Conclusion
The management of uncomplicated skin abscesses has evolved with the growing recognition of the potential benefits of adding antibiotics to the conventional surgical drainage approach. The clinical practice guideline and the UCLA study provide valuable insights into the effective use of antibiotics in this context, while emphasizing the importance of selective and responsible antibiotic use to combat the rise of antibiotic resistance.
Adding antibiotics for abscess management
1. Gottlieb M, DeMott JM, Hallock M, Peksa GD. Systemic antibiotics for the treatment of skin and soft tissue abscesses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;73(1):8–16. Epub 2018 Mar 9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Wang W, Chen W, Liu Y, Siemieniuk RAC, Li L, Martínez JPD, et al. Antibiotics for uncomplicated skin abscesses: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e020991. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Daum RS, Miller LG, Immergluck L, Fritz S, Creech CB, Young D, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of antibiotics for smaller skin abscesses. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(26):2545–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Talan DA, Mower WR, Krishnadasan A, Abrahamian FM, Lovecchio F, Karras DJ, et al. Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole versus placebo for uncomplicated skin abscess. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):823–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Fahimi J, Singh A, Frazee BW. The role of adjunctive antibiotics in the treatment of skin and soft tissue abscesses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CJEM. 2015;17(4):420–32. Epub 2015 Feb 20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Singer AJ, Thode HC., Jr Systemic antibiotics after incision and drainage of simple abscesses: a meta-analysis. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(7):576–8. Epub 2013 May 18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJ, Gorbach SL, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Disease Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(2):e10–52. Erratum in: Clin Infect Dis 2015;60(9):1448. Epub 2015 Feb 26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Vermandere M, Aertgeerts B, Agoritsas T, Liu C, Burgers J, Merglen A, et al. Antibiotics after incision and drainage for uncomplicated skin abscesses: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2018;360:k243. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Loewen K, Schreiber Y, Kirlew M, Bocking N, Kelly L. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Literature review and clinical update. Can Fam Physician. 2017;63:512–20. Erratum in: Can Fam Physician 2017;63:596. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Korownyk C, Allan GM. Evidence-based approach to abscess management. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53:1680–4. Erratum in: Can Fam Physician 2007;53:2105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Bourne CL, Brewer KL, House J. Injectable lidocaine provides similar analgesia compared to transdermal lidocaine/tetracaine patch for the incision and drainage of skin abscesses: a randomized, controlled trial. J Emerg Med. 2014;47(3):367–71. Epub 2014 May 14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Chinnock B, Hendey GW. Irrigation of cutaneous abscesses does not improve treatment success. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;67(3):379–83. Epub 2015 Sep 23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. O’Malley GF, Dominici P, Giraldo P, Aguilera E, Verma M, Lares C, et al. Routine packing of simple cutaneous abscesses is painful and probably unnecessary. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(5):470–3. Epub 2009 Apr 10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Better way to treat abscesses: Add antibiotic to conventional approach
UCLA researchers have found that doctors can use a specific antibiotic in addition to surgically draining an abscess to give people a better chance of recovery. The discovery turns on its head the long-held notion that surgical drainage alone is sufficient for treating abscesses.
The findings are particularly important because of the emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, which since 2000 has become the most common cause of skin infections — initially in the U.S. and now in many other parts of the world.
The UCLA study will be published March 3 by the New England Journal of Medicine.
“We found that adding in a specific antibiotic to the medical treatment also resulted in fewer recurring infections, fewer infections in other places on the body and fewer people passing on the infection to other members of the household,” said Dr. David Talan, the study’s lead author and a professor in the department of emergency medicine and department of medicine, division of infectious diseases, at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and Olive View–UCLA Medical Center. “This translates into fewer medical visits and reduced health care costs.”
Reed Hutchinson/UCLA – Dr. Gregory Moran
In the U.S., emergency department visits for skin infections nearly tripled from 1.2 million to 3.4 million between 1993 and 2005, and the burden of such infections has continued since then. Most of the increase was due to a greater incidence of skin abscesses — pus-filled boils or pimples with discharge that are the most frequent way people get MRSA infections.
“Traditional teaching has been that the only treatment needed for most skin abscesses is surgical drainage — and that antibiotics don’t provide an extra benefit,” said Dr. Gregory Moran, clinical professor of emergency medicine at the Geffen School, chief of the department of emergency medicine at Olive View–UCLA and one of the study’s authors. “Our findings will likely result in patients more often being recommended to take antibiotics in addition to having surgical drainage when they get a skin abscess.”
Emergency department doctors still grapple with how to best treat and prevent MRSA, given its resistance to many antibiotics.
“The problem is steadily increasing and anyone can get MRSA, particularly those who are in close contact with other people, such as through sports,” Talan said. “MRSA is commonly transmitted between family members or roommates, and it has even caused outbreaks on NFL teams.”
The study examined treatment for more than 1,200 patients at five hospital emergency departments — in Los Angeles; Baltimore; Kansas City, Missouri; Philadelphia and Phoenix. For some patients, doctors prescribed an inexpensive, generic antibiotic called trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, also known as Bactrim, for seven days after the abscess was surgically drained. For others, they prescribed a placebo for seven days.
They found that 93 percent of patients who took the antibiotic were cured, well above the 86 percent who took the placebo.
“MRSA is not going away, so we need to find better ways to treat and prevent i
Share The materials are intended exclusively for physicians and specialists with higher medical education. Articles are informational and educational in nature. Self-medication and self-diagnosis are extremely dangerous for health. The author of the articles does not give medical advice: a clinical pharmacologist is a doctor only and exclusively for doctors. Pathogens
Clinical
Diagnosis:
Treatment Antibacterial therapy
Antibacterial therapy in special categories of patients, guidelines yami , P. aeruginosa, Nocardia, Cryptococcus, Aspergillus , Pneumocystis pneumonia , Rhodococcus equi , MAC, M. kansasii , lymphoma Drainage and surgery § no response to antibiotic treatment; § Abscess cavity > 6 cm in diameter; § severe/serious comorbidities; § Gram-negative pathogens. Conclusion
More information
Literary sources
J01CR01 – Ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor J01CR02 – Amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor J01DH02 – Meropenem J01DH04 – Doripenem J01DH51 – Imipenem and cilastatin J01FF01 – Clindamycin J01XA01 – Vancomycin J01XX08 – Linezolid J85 Lung and mediastinal abscess ← Previous article Next article → Share You may be interested in
|
Share The materials are intended exclusively for physicians and specialists with higher medical education. Articles are informational and educational in nature. Self-medication and self-diagnosis are extremely dangerous for health. The author of the articles does not give medical advice: a clinical pharmacologist is a doctor only and exclusively for doctors. Pathogens
Primary sources (predisposing diseases) and probable pathogens ) and anaerobic streptococci, Haemo philus spp ., Dacteroides spp., Fusobacterium spp., Prevotella spp . Clinic Diagnosis Treatment Empiric antibiotic therapy Surgery and complementary therapies: Pathogenetic therapy Conclusion Optional: Arlotti M, Grossi P, Pea F, Tomei G, Vullo V, De Rosa FG, Di Perri G, Nicastri E, Lauria FN, Carosi G, Moroni M, Ippolito G; GISIG (Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulle Infezioni Gravi) Working Group on Brain Abscesses. Consensus document on controversial issues for the treatment of infections of the central nervous system: bacterial brain abscesses . Int J Infect Dis. 2010 Oct – http://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(10)02368-4/pdf J01CA01 – Ampicillin J01CE09 – Benzylpenicillin procaine J01CF04 – Oxacillin J01CR01 – Ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor J01CR05 – Piperacillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor J01DD01 – Cefotaxime J01DD02 – Ceftazidime J01DD04 – Ceftriaxone J01DF01 – Aztreonam J01DH02 – Meropenem J01FF01 – Clindamycin J01MA02 – Ciprofloxacin J01MA12 – Levofloxacin J01XA01 – Vancomycin J01XD01 – Metronidazole J01XX08 – Linezolid J04AB02 – Rifampicin P02BA01 – Praziquantel P02CA03 – Albendazole G06. |