Biological weapons used. Biological Weapons: A Comprehensive Guide to Types, Effects, and Global Regulations

28.04.202214.07.2023 by alexxlab

What are biological weapons and how do they work. How have biological weapons been used throughout history. What international regulations govern biological weapons. How can we prevent the development and use of biological weapons.

Содержание

The Nature and Components of Biological Weapons

Biological weapons are sophisticated tools of warfare that utilize disease-causing organisms or toxins to inflict harm on humans, animals, or plants. These weapons consist of two primary components:

A weaponized agent
A delivery mechanism

The weaponized agent is typically a pathogen or toxin that has been enhanced from its natural state to make it more suitable for mass production, storage, and dissemination. The delivery mechanism, on the other hand, is the means by which the agent is dispersed to its intended targets.

Weaponized Agents: The Core of Biological Weapons

What types of agents are used in biological weapons? A wide range of disease-causing organisms can be weaponized, including:

Bacteria (e.g., anthrax, plague)
Viruses (e.g., smallpox, foot-and-mouth disease)
Fungi
Prions
Rickettsiae
Toxins (poisons derived from animals, plants, or microorganisms)

Historical biological weapons programs have explored the use of various agents, including aflatoxin, botulinum toxin, Q fever, rice blast, ricin, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and tularaemia, among others.

Delivery Mechanisms: Spreading the Threat

How are biological weapons delivered to their targets? Delivery systems for biological weapons can take many forms, including:

Missiles
Bombs
Hand grenades
Rockets
Spray tanks fitted to aircraft, cars, trucks, or boats
Specialized devices for assassinations or sabotage operations (e.g., sprays, brushes, injection systems)
Contaminated food and clothing

The diversity of delivery mechanisms highlights the versatility and potential for widespread impact of biological weapons.

The Multifaceted Threat of Biological Weapons

Biological weapons pose a complex and multifaceted threat that extends beyond traditional military applications. What are the potential uses of biological weapons?

Strategic or tactical military operations
Political assassinations
Infection of livestock or agricultural produce
Creation of environmental catastrophes
Introduction of widespread illness, fear, and mistrust among the public

The use of biological weapons can have far-reaching consequences, including food shortages, economic loss, and societal disruption. The psychological impact of a biological attack can be just as devastating as its physical effects, potentially causing widespread panic and erosion of trust in institutions.

The Evolution of Biological Weapons: From Ancient Practices to Modern Threats

The use of biological agents as weapons is not a new concept. How long have biological weapons been used in warfare? The practice dates back to ancient times, with historical records documenting the use of infectious agents and poisons against enemy personnel.

Throughout the 20th century, biological weapons have been used in various contexts:

By individuals and groups committing criminal acts or targeted assassinations
In state-sponsored biological warfare programs
Through accidental releases of pathogens from laboratories

The development of biological weapons has also been marked by technological advances. How have recent advancements impacted the landscape of biological weapons?

Recent technological progress has raised concerns about the increased likelihood of these weapons being acquired or produced by non-state actors, including individuals or terrorist organizations. This shift in accessibility presents new challenges for global security and regulation efforts.

The Challenges of Identifying and Responding to Biological Events

One of the most significant challenges in dealing with biological weapons is the difficulty in distinguishing between natural disease outbreaks, accidents, and deliberate use. How can we determine the cause of a suspicious disease event?

In practice, identifying the source of a biological event requires the coordination of actors from many sectors. These experts collectively possess the capability to determine the cause and attribute it to a specific source. This multi-sectoral approach is crucial for both preparedness and prevention.

What steps are involved in responding to a biological event?

Rapid detection and identification of the biological agent
Implementation of containment measures
Treatment of affected individuals
Tracing the origin of the outbreak
Coordination of local, national, and international response efforts

The World Health Organization provides comprehensive guidance on preparing for and responding to disease outbreaks and biological weapons attacks, emphasizing the importance of a coordinated, multi-disciplinary approach.

International Regulations and Coordination Efforts

Given the global nature of the biological weapons threat, international cooperation is crucial. What international agreements govern biological weapons?

The primary international treaty addressing biological weapons is the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). Opened for signature in 1972 and entering into force in 1975, the BWC prohibits the development, production, and stockpiling of biological and toxin weapons.

How does the BWC approach the management of biological risks? The convention relies on a network approach, emphasizing coordination with international, regional, and nongovernmental organizations and initiatives. This strategy aims to address the interconnected nature of biological threats in a holistic manner.

The Benefits of a Coordinated Approach

Why is a multi-sectoral, coordinated approach crucial in managing biological risks? This strategy offers several advantages:

Optimal use of resources
Improved capacity to detect and respond to both natural and deliberate disease outbreaks
Enhanced public health worldwide
Strengthened global preparedness for a range of biological threats

By building capacities across sectors to monitor disease, countries not only improve their ability to detect and respond to a potential biological attack but also enhance their capacity to track and mitigate naturally occurring diseases.

The Spectrum of Biological Risks: Beyond Weapons

While biological weapons represent a significant threat, they are part of a broader spectrum of biological risks. What other biological hazards should we be concerned about?

Naturally occurring disease outbreaks
Accidental releases of pathogens from laboratories
Emerging infectious diseases
Antimicrobial resistance
Bioterrorism

This wide range of potential biological hazards underscores the need for a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary approach to risk management. How can we effectively manage this diverse array of biological risks?

Effective management strategies include:

Strengthening global disease surveillance systems
Improving laboratory biosafety and biosecurity measures
Enhancing international cooperation and information sharing
Investing in research and development of medical countermeasures
Building capacity for rapid response to biological incidents

By addressing these risks collectively, we can create a more resilient global health security framework that is better equipped to handle a range of biological threats, whether natural or man-made.

The Role of Science and Technology in Biological Weapons Control

Advancements in science and technology play a dual role in the context of biological weapons. How does scientific progress impact biological weapons control efforts?

On one hand, technological advances can potentially increase the accessibility and potency of biological weapons. On the other hand, these same advances can enhance our ability to detect, prevent, and respond to biological threats.

Emerging Technologies: A Double-Edged Sword

What emerging technologies are relevant to biological weapons control?

Gene editing and synthetic biology
Advanced biosensors and detection systems
Artificial intelligence and machine learning
Next-generation sequencing technologies
Nanotechnology

These technologies have the potential to revolutionize both the development of biological weapons and our defenses against them. For instance, gene editing techniques could be used to create more virulent pathogens, but they could also be employed to develop more effective vaccines and treatments.

The Importance of Responsible Science

Given the dual-use nature of many biotechnologies, how can we ensure that scientific advances are used responsibly? Several approaches are crucial:

Promoting a culture of responsible science within the research community
Implementing robust biosafety and biosecurity measures in laboratories
Enhancing international cooperation and information sharing on scientific developments
Developing and enforcing ethical guidelines for biotechnology research
Educating scientists about the potential misuse of their work

By fostering a responsible approach to scientific research and development, we can harness the benefits of technological progress while minimizing the risks associated with biological weapons.

Future Challenges and Opportunities in Biological Weapons Control

As we look to the future, what challenges and opportunities lie ahead in the realm of biological weapons control? Several key areas warrant attention:

Emerging Threats and Evolving Technologies

How will future technological developments impact biological weapons control? As biotechnology continues to advance, we may see:

The emergence of novel biological agents with enhanced virulence or transmissibility
Increased accessibility of biotechnology tools and knowledge
The potential for AI-assisted design of biological weapons
New delivery mechanisms for biological agents

These developments will necessitate ongoing adaptation of our biological weapons control strategies and technologies.

Strengthening Global Preparedness

What steps can be taken to enhance global preparedness for biological threats? Key areas for improvement include:

Bolstering international cooperation and information sharing
Enhancing global disease surveillance and early warning systems
Improving capacity for rapid development and distribution of medical countermeasures
Strengthening national and international response capabilities
Addressing gaps in biological weapons-related legislation and enforcement

By focusing on these areas, the international community can build a more robust and resilient framework for biological weapons control and broader biological risk management.

The Role of Public Awareness and Education

How can public awareness contribute to biological weapons control efforts? Educating the public about biological risks and the importance of biological weapons control can:

Foster support for international control efforts
Encourage responsible behavior in relevant scientific and industrial sectors
Improve community resilience in the face of biological threats
Facilitate early detection and reporting of suspicious activities

Public engagement and education should therefore be considered a crucial component of comprehensive biological weapons control strategies.

As we navigate the complex landscape of biological weapons control, a multifaceted approach that combines scientific advancement, international cooperation, and public engagement will be essential. By addressing the challenges and seizing the opportunities presented by this evolving field, we can work towards a future where the threat of biological weapons is minimized, and global health security is strengthened.

What are Biological Weapons? – UNODA

Biological weapons disseminate disease-causing organisms or toxins to harm or kill humans, animals or plants.

They generally consist of two parts – a weaponized agent and a delivery mechanism. In addition to strategic or tactical military applications, biological weapons can be used for political assassinations, the infection of livestock or agricultural produce to cause food shortages and economic loss, the creation of environmental catastrophes, and the introduction of widespread illness, fear and mistrust among the public.

Weaponized agent

Almost any disease-causing organism (such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions or rickettsiae) or toxin (poisons derived from animals, plants or microorganisms, or similar substances produced synthetically) can be used in biological weapons. The agents can be enhanced from their natural state to make them more suitable for mass production, storage, and dissemination as weapons. Historical biological weapons programmes have included efforts to produce: aflatoxin; anthrax; botulinum toxin; foot-and-mouth disease; glanders; plague; Q fever; rice blast; ricin; Rocky Mountain spotted fever; smallpox; and tularaemia, among others.

Delivery mechanism

Biological weapons delivery systems can take a variety of forms. Past programmes have constructed missiles, bombs, hand grenades and rockets to deliver biological weapons. A number of programmes also designed spray-tanks to be fitted to aircraft, cars, trucks and boats. There have also been documented efforts to develop delivery devices for assassinations or sabotage operations, including a variety of sprays, brushes and injection systems as well as means for contaminating food and clothing.

Technological advances

In addition to concerns that biological weapons could be developed or used by States, recent technological advances could increase the likelihood of these weapons being acquired or produced by non-state actors, including individuals or terrorist organizations. For more information about recent scientific and technological advances relevant to the Convention, please click here. The 20th century saw the use of biological weapons by individuals and groups committing criminal acts or targeted assassinations, biological warfare conducted by States, and the accidental release of pathogens from laboratories. There were also false accusations of biological weapons use, highlighting the difficulty in differentiating between naturally-occurring disease, accidents and deliberate use.

Biological event

In practice, should a suspicious disease event occur, it would be difficult to determine if it was caused by nature, an accident, sabotage, or an act of biological warfare or terrorism. Consequently, the response to a biological event, whether natural, accidental or deliberate, would involve the coordination of actors from many sectors who together possess the capability to determine the cause and attribute it to a specific source. Likewise, the preparedness for and prevention of such an event should also involve multi-sectoral coordination. For more information about preparing for and responding to disease outbreaks and biological weapons attacks, please see the frequently asked questions published by the World Health Organization.

Spectrum of biological risks

International coordination

Because of the wide spectrum of potential biological hazards, efforts to manage the risks should be multi-disciplinary, multi-sectoral, and above all, coordinated. As such, the BWC relies primarily on a network approach based on coordination with international, regional, and nongovernmental organizations and initiatives in order to address the interconnected nature of biological threats in a holistic manner. Under the framework of the BWC, improved coordination would provide positive externalities for managing disease, whatever the cause. Such an approach ensures that resources are used optimally to provide benefits for many. In this sense, for example, building capacities across sectors to monitor disease not only strengthens the ability to detect and respond to a biological attack, but it also provides States with the capacity to track and mitigate naturally occurring disease, thus vastly improving public health worldwide.

Biological weapon | Types, Effects & History

Category:

History & Society

Related Topics:: plague
smallpox
anthrax
ricin
yellow rain

See all related content →

biological weapon, also called germ weapon, any of a number of disease-producing agents—such as bacteria, viruses, rickettsiae, fungi, toxins, or other biological agents—that may be utilized as weapons against humans, animals, or plants.

The direct use of infectious agents and poisons against enemy personnel is an ancient practice in warfare. Indeed, in many conflicts, diseases have been responsible for more deaths than all the employed combat arms combined, even when they have not consciously been used as weapons.

Biological weapons, like chemical weapons, radiological weapons, and nuclear weapons, are commonly referred to as weapons of mass destruction, although the term is not truly appropriate in the case of biological armaments. Lethal biological weapons may be capable of causing mass deaths, but they are incapable of mass destruction of infrastructure, buildings, or equipment. Nevertheless, because of the indiscriminate nature of these weapons—as well as the potential for starting widespread pandemics, the difficulty of controlling disease effects, and the simple fear that they inspire—most countries have agreed to ban the entire class.

As of 2013 a total of 180 states and Taiwan had signed the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and 170 of those states and Taiwan had signed and ratified the treaty, which was opened for signature in 1972. Under the terms of the BWC, member states are prohibited from using biological weapons in warfare and from developing, testing, producing, stockpiling, or deploying them. However, a number of states have continued to pursue biological warfare capabilities, seeking a cheaper but still deadly strategic weapon rather than following the more difficult and expensive path to nuclear weapons. In addition, the threat that some deranged individual or terrorist organization will manufacture or steal biological weapons is a growing security concern.

Biological warfare agents

Biological warfare agents differ greatly in the type of organism or toxin used in a weapons system, lethality, length of incubation, infectiousness, stability, and ability to be treated with current vaccines and medicines. There are five different categories of biological agents that could be weaponized and used in warfare or terrorism. These include:

Bacteria—single-cell organisms that cause diseases such as anthrax, brucellosis, tularemia, and plague.
Rickettsiae—microorganisms that resemble bacteria but differ in that they are intracellular parasites that reproduce inside cells. Typhus and Q fever are examples of diseases caused by rickettsia organisms.
Viruses—intracellular parasites, about 1/100 the size of bacteria, that can be weaponized to cause diseases such as Venezuelan equine encephalitis.
Fungi—pathogens that can be weaponized for use against crops to cause such diseases as rice blast, cereal rust, wheat smut, and potato blight.
Toxins—poisons that can be weaponized after extraction from snakes, insects, spiders, marine organisms, plants, bacteria, fungi, and animals. An example of a toxin is ricin, which is derived from the seed of the castor bean.

Some of these biological agents have properties that would make them more likely candidates for weaponization, such as their lethality, ability to incapacitate, contagiousness or noncontagiousness, hardiness and stability, and other characteristics. Among the agents deemed likely candidates for biological weapons use are the toxins ricin, staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB), botulinum toxin, and T-2 mycotoxin and the infectious agents responsible for anthrax, brucellosis, cholera, pneumonic plague, tularemia, Q fever, smallpox, glanders, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, and viral hemorrhagic fever. Various states at various times have looked into weaponizing dozens of other biological agents in addition.

Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content.

Subscribe Now

Defense against biological weapons

Military defense

Most weaponized lethal biological agents are intended to be delivered as aerosols, which would cause infections when breathed by the targeted personnel. For this reason, the most-effective defense against biological weapons is a good protective mask equipped with filters capable of blocking bacteria, viruses, and spores larger than one micron (one micrometre; one-millionth of a metre) in cross section from entry into the wearer’s nasal passages and lungs. Protective overgarments, including boots and gloves, are useful for preventing biological agents from contacting open wounds or breaks in the skin. Also, decontaminants can neutralize biological agents in infected areas after a biological attack.

Developing and fielding effective biological weapon sensors that can trigger an alarm would allow personnel to don masks before exposure, get into protective overgarments, and go inside, preferably into toxic-free collective protection shelters. Medical teams could then immediately go into action to check and treat those who may have been exposed.

Biological warfare attacks can be made less effective, or ineffective, if the targeted persons have been vaccinated against the specific disease-causing agent used in an attack.

Civil defense against biological weapons has greatly improved since the September 11, 2001, attacks in the United States, but progress does not necessarily equal success. A successful civil defense against major biological attacks requires that significant progress be made in sensors, warning systems, vaccines, medicines, training of responders, and public education as well as in planning of emergency procedures. These aspects of civil defense are described briefly in this section, using as examples certain practices put into effect in the United States since September 11.

The foundation of any civil defense against a biological weapons attack is the medical system that has already been set up to deal with naturally occurring diseases. Special vaccines have been created, tested, and approved to deal with the two most lethal biological agents that can also be most easily weaponized: anthrax and smallpox. For example, the U.S. government has enough smallpox vaccine to vaccinate the entire American population and enough anthrax vaccine to inoculate at least every member of the U.S. military.

Effective vaccines for plague and cholera now exist and have been approved for use, but only small quantities have been produced, far short of what might be needed if large numbers of people were to be infected. Furthermore, in the United States a number of vaccines are still in the Investigational New Drug (IND) category and await further trials before the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) can validate their effectiveness and safety. Included among these are vaccines for Q fever, tularemia, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, viral hemorrhagic fever, and botulism.

At present no effective vaccines exist for preventing infections from glanders, brucellosis, staphylococcal enterotoxin B, ricin, or T-2 mycotoxins—all biological agents that some countries have researched for military use or have weaponized in the past. However, in some cases where vaccines are not yet available, medicines have been developed that help the sick to recover.

Long-term medical research is being conducted to investigate the possibility of developing vaccines and supplements that, when administered, might raise the effectiveness of the recipient’s immune system to protect against the whole spectrum of probable biological warfare agents.

One U.S. civil defense program that might make a difference in a biological emergency is the Strategic National Stockpile program, which has created 50-ton “push packages” of vaccines, medicines, decontamination agents, and emergency medical equipment, which are stored in a dozen locations across the country in preparation for emergencies. Furthermore, every U.S. state has bioterrorism response plans in place, including plans or guidelines for mass vaccinations, triage, and quarantines. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has also drafted model legislation on emergency health powers for states to adopt in order to deal with such crises.

A new emergency response system was created in the United States following the September 11 attacks. The National Guard increased the number of its Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Teams, which respond to chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapons attacks—augmenting the police, fire, and medical first responders in the local area of any attacks. In addition, the Department of Homeland Security, working with the Department of Health and Human Services, invested heavily in passive defenses against biological attacks, focusing on such programs as Project BioShield and the Laboratory Response Network. The CDC also embarked on a training program on bioterrorism for thousands of medical lab technicians, and the National Institutes of Health funded new biocontainment research laboratories to further research in vaccines, medicines, and bioforensics.

Sensors to detect the presence of biological agents in the air, in water, or on surfaces are still relatively ineffective, but the aim of research is to create a “detect-to-warn” system that would provide enough time for potential victims to don masks, cover up, and take shelter before they are infected. The current “detect-to-treat” capability is unsatisfactory because responders would be treating many persons already infected. Most current biological detectors are point detectors, which are not capable of giving advance warning after scanning an airborne cloud of particles to discern if those particles contain biological agents of a specific type.

The USA used all types of weapons of mass destruction, Patrushev reminded

https://ria.ru/20220328/patrushev-1780517487.html

The USA used all types of weapons of mass destruction, Patrushev reminded

The USA used all types of weapons of mass destruction, Patrushev recalled – RIA Novosti, 03/28/2022

The United States used all types of weapons of mass destruction, Patrushev recalled RIA Novosti, 03/28/2022

2022-03-28T16:56

0003

usa

moscow

us ministry of defense

red cross

rkhbz troops

nikolay patrushev

/html/head/meta[@name=’og:title’]/@content

/html/head/meta[@name=’og:description’]/@content

https://cdnn21. img.ria.ru/images/07e5/05/0c/1731982031_0:30:3264:1866_1920x0_80_0_0_f60923a1a7581da84ceda3876dde01e9.jpg

MOSCOW, March 28 – RIA Novosti. The United States is the only country that has used all types of weapons of mass destruction against sovereign countries, said Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Nikolai Patrushev. In addition to a springboard for anti-Russian activities, Washington-controlled Ukraine was used to create threats to the entire civilized world, Patrushev noted at negotiations with his Algerian counterpart Nureddin Makri in Moscow. “I mean, first of all, the closed US military biological programs being implemented on its territory, as well as plans to create nuclear weapons,” the Security Council Secretary added. similar American projects to analyze possible risks for their population have already led to awareness of the seriousness of this problem throughout the world, Patrushev noted. “This requires special attention from the entire civilized world, since only the United States has not joined the protocol on mutual control under the international Convention on Biological and toxin weapons. In addition, the United States is the only state in history to have used all types of weapons of mass destruction against sovereign countries,” he added. laboratories in Ukraine that participated in the American military biological program and dealt, in particular, with the causative agents of plague and anthrax. A network of more than 30 biological laboratories has been formed on the territory of Ukraine, working in the interests of the Pentagon, said Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, head of the Radiation, Chemical and Biological Protection Troops (RCBZ) of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Everything for the continuation of the military biological program of the United States has already been taken out of Ukraine after the start of the Russian special military operation, he said. The United States in August 1945 years dropped two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Americans used bacteriological weapons during the Korean War in the early 1950s. As for chemical weapons, the United States used them, including in the 1960s in South Vietnam. At that time, 10% of the country’s territory was affected by the “agent orange” chemical – this is the largest use of chemical weapons in history. The Vietnamese Red Cross estimated that 3 million people were affected by the use of the chemical, including 150,000 children born with hereditary disorders.

https://ria.ru/20220326/medvedev-1780208448.html

https://ria.ru/20220325/skhvatka-1779931923.html

Russia

USA

Moscow

RIA Novosti

4.7

[email protected]

7 495 645-6601

Rossiya Segodnya

900 02 https://xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards /

2022

Daria Buymova

News

ru-RU

https://ria.ru/docs/about/copyright.html

https://xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/

RIA Novosti

4.7

[email protected]

7 495 645-6601

Rossiya Segodnya

https://xn--c1acbl 2abdlkab1og. xn--p1ai/awards/

1920

1080

true

1920

1440

true

2.jpg

1920

true

RIA Novosti

4.7

[email protected]

7 495 645-6601

Rossiya Segodnya

900 02 https://xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards /

Daria Buimova

igor kirillov, russia, united states, moscow, us ministry of defence, red cross, rkhbz troops, nikolay patrushev, in the world world

MOSCOW, March 28 – RIA Novosti. The United States is the only country that has used all types of weapons of mass destruction against sovereign countries, said Nikolai Patrushev, Secretary of the Russian Security Council.

In addition to a springboard for anti-Russian activities, Washington-controlled Ukraine was used to create threats to the entire civilized world, Patrushev noted at talks with his Algerian counterpart Nureddin Makri in Moscow. “I mean, first of all, the closed US military-biological programs being implemented on its territory, as well as plans to create nuclear weapons,” the Security Council secretary added.

Medvedev: the end of the unipolar world, the US is no longer the master of the planet Earth their populations have already led to awareness of the seriousness of this problem throughout the world, Patrushev noted.

“This requires the special attention of the entire civilized world, since only the United States has not joined the protocol on mutual control under the international Convention on Biological and Toxin Weapons. In addition, the United States is the only state that has used all types of weapons of mass destruction in history against sovereign countries,” he added.

The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation previously held a presentation from which it follows that the United States spent more than $ 200 million on the operation of biological laboratories in Ukraine, which participated in the American military biological program and dealt, in particular, with plague and anthrax. A network of more than 30 biological laboratories has been formed on the territory of Ukraine, working in the interests of the Pentagon, said Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, head of the Radiation, Chemical and Biological Protection Troops (RCBZ) of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Everything for the continuation of the US military biological program has already been removed from Ukraine after the start of the Russian special military operation, he said.

In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Americans used bacteriological weapons during the Korean War in the early 1950s. As for chemical weapons, the United States used them, including in the 1960s in South Vietnam. At that time, 10% of the country’s territory was affected by the “agent orange” chemical – this is the largest use of chemical weapons in history. The Vietnamese Red Cross estimated that 3 million people were affected by the use of the chemical, including 150,000 children born with hereditary disorders.