What is a CT scan and how does it work. What medical conditions can a CT scan detect. How is a CT scan different from other imaging techniques. What are the risks and benefits of CT scans. How should patients prepare for a CT scan. What happens during and after a CT scan procedure. How are CT scan results interpreted and used by healthcare professionals.

Understanding CT Scans: Principles and Technology

CT scans, short for computed tomography scans, are sophisticated medical imaging techniques that provide detailed cross-sectional images of the body. These scans utilize X-rays and computer processing to create highly detailed three-dimensional images of internal structures.

How does a CT scan work? The process involves a rotating X-ray tube that emits a narrow beam of X-rays as it moves around the patient. Detectors on the opposite side of the patient measure the amount of radiation absorbed by different tissues. This data is then processed by a computer to generate detailed cross-sectional images, or “slices,” of the body.

Key Components of a CT Scanner

• X-ray tube: Generates the X-ray beam
• Detectors: Measure the absorbed radiation
• Gantry: The rotating frame that houses the X-ray tube and detectors
• Patient table: Moves the patient through the gantry
• Computer system: Processes the data and reconstructs images

CT scans offer several advantages over traditional X-rays. They provide much more detailed images of soft tissues, bones, and blood vessels, allowing for better visualization of internal structures and potential abnormalities. Moreover, CT scans can create three-dimensional images, which is particularly useful for surgical planning and complex diagnoses.

Clinical Applications: What Can CT Scans Detect?

CT scans are versatile diagnostic tools used to identify a wide range of medical conditions across various body systems. Their ability to provide detailed images of both soft tissues and bones makes them invaluable in many clinical scenarios.

Common Uses of CT Scans

1. Head and brain imaging: Detecting tumors, hemorrhages, or signs of stroke
2. Chest and lung scans: Identifying lung diseases, tumors, or pulmonary embolisms
3. Abdominal and pelvic imaging: Diagnosing issues with organs like the liver, pancreas, intestines, and kidneys
4. Spine and musculoskeletal system: Evaluating bone and joint problems, including fractures and arthritis
5. Cancer staging: Determining the size and location of tumors and checking for metastases
6. Vascular imaging: Examining blood vessels for aneurysms or blockages
7. Trauma assessment: Quickly identifying internal injuries in emergency situations

Can CT scans detect all types of cancer? While CT scans are excellent at identifying many types of tumors, they may not detect all cancers, especially in early stages or in certain areas of the body. Other imaging techniques, such as MRI or PET scans, may be more appropriate for specific types of cancer detection.

CT Scan vs. Other Imaging Techniques: A Comparative Analysis

While CT scans are powerful diagnostic tools, they are not the only imaging technique available to healthcare professionals. Understanding how CT scans compare to other imaging methods can help patients and doctors make informed decisions about the most appropriate diagnostic approach.

CT Scan vs. MRI

How do CT scans differ from MRI scans? CT scans use X-rays to create images, while MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves. CT scans are generally faster and better at imaging bone, lung, and blood vessel details. MRI scans, on the other hand, provide superior soft tissue contrast and are often preferred for brain, spinal cord, and musculoskeletal imaging.

CT Scan vs. X-ray

Traditional X-rays provide two-dimensional images and are excellent for visualizing bone structures. However, CT scans offer more detailed, three-dimensional images that can show both bone and soft tissue. CT scans are particularly useful when more comprehensive information is needed beyond what a standard X-ray can provide.

CT Scan vs. Ultrasound

Ultrasound uses high-frequency sound waves to create real-time images of soft tissues and is particularly useful for examining organs and blood flow. While ultrasound is radiation-free and offers real-time imaging, CT scans provide more detailed images of a wider range of body structures and are less operator-dependent.

Risks and Benefits: Weighing the Pros and Cons of CT Scans

As with any medical procedure, CT scans come with both benefits and potential risks. Understanding these can help patients make informed decisions about their healthcare.

Benefits of CT Scans

• Non-invasive and painless
• Provide detailed images of many types of tissue
• Quick and accurate for emergency diagnosis
• Can eliminate the need for exploratory surgery
• Guide medical procedures such as biopsies and radiation therapy

Potential Risks and Considerations

Are there any risks associated with CT scans? While CT scans are generally safe, there are some potential risks to consider:

• Radiation exposure: CT scans use ionizing radiation, which in high doses can increase cancer risk
• Allergic reactions to contrast materials: Some patients may experience allergic reactions to the iodine-based contrast agents used in some CT scans
• False positives: CT scans may sometimes detect abnormalities that turn out to be harmless, leading to unnecessary worry or additional testing
• Pregnancy considerations: CT scans are generally avoided during pregnancy unless absolutely necessary

How can the risks of CT scans be minimized? Healthcare providers take several steps to reduce risks, including using the lowest possible radiation dose, carefully screening patients for contrast allergies, and considering alternative imaging methods when appropriate.

Patient Preparation: Getting Ready for Your CT Scan

Proper preparation can help ensure that your CT scan provides the most accurate results possible while minimizing potential complications.

Before the Scan

How should patients prepare for a CT scan? Preparation may vary depending on the type of CT scan and the area of the body being examined. However, some general guidelines include:

• Inform your doctor of any allergies, especially to iodine or contrast materials
• Notify your healthcare provider if you are pregnant or think you might be
• Follow any fasting instructions if required for your specific scan
• Wear comfortable, loose-fitting clothing and remove any metal objects (jewelry, dentures, etc.)
• Bring any relevant previous imaging studies or medical records

For some CT scans, you may be asked to drink a contrast solution or receive an intravenous (IV) contrast injection. These help to enhance the visibility of certain structures in the images.

The CT Scan Procedure: What to Expect During and After

Understanding what happens during and after a CT scan can help alleviate anxiety and ensure a smooth experience for patients.

During the Scan

What happens during a CT scan procedure? The actual scanning process is relatively quick and painless:

1. You’ll lie on a table that slides into the CT scanner, which looks like a large donut
2. The technologist will position you correctly for the scan
3. You’ll be asked to remain still during the scan to avoid blurry images
4. The table will move slowly through the scanner as it takes images
5. You may hear whirring or buzzing noises as the scanner operates
6. For some scans, you may be asked to hold your breath briefly
7. The entire procedure typically takes 10-30 minutes, depending on the type of scan

After the Scan

After the CT scan is complete:

• You can usually resume normal activities immediately
• If you received contrast material, you’ll be advised to drink plenty of fluids to help flush it from your system
• In rare cases, you may experience mild side effects from the contrast material, such as nausea or a rash
• Your doctor will inform you when to expect the results of your scan

Interpreting CT Scan Results: From Images to Diagnosis

The interpretation of CT scan images is a crucial step in the diagnostic process, requiring expertise and careful analysis.

The Role of Radiologists

How are CT scan results interpreted? Radiologists, specialized doctors trained in reading and interpreting medical images, analyze CT scan results. They look for any abnormalities or changes in the scanned area, comparing the images to what is considered normal for a patient of that age and medical history.

Radiologists consider factors such as:

• Size, shape, and location of organs and structures
• Presence of any masses, tumors, or abnormal growths
• Signs of inflammation or infection
• Evidence of injury or trauma
• Abnormalities in blood vessels or bone structure

From Images to Treatment Plans

How do doctors use CT scan results to guide treatment? Once the radiologist has interpreted the images, they create a detailed report for the referring physician. This report, along with the images, helps the doctor to:

• Confirm or rule out a suspected diagnosis
• Determine the extent or stage of a disease
• Plan appropriate treatment strategies
• Monitor the effectiveness of ongoing treatments
• Guide surgical procedures or biopsies

In some cases, additional tests or follow-up scans may be recommended to further investigate any findings or to monitor changes over time.

Advances in CT Technology: The Future of Medical Imaging

CT scan technology continues to evolve, with ongoing research and development leading to improvements in image quality, speed, and patient safety.

Recent Innovations

What are some recent advancements in CT scan technology? Some notable developments include:

• Dual-energy CT: Provides additional information about tissue composition
• Spectral CT: Offers improved tissue characterization and material differentiation
• Ultra-high resolution CT: Produces exceptionally detailed images for specific applications
• Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration: Enhances image reconstruction and aids in diagnosis
• Low-dose protocols: Reduce radiation exposure while maintaining image quality

Future Directions

What might the future hold for CT scan technology? Researchers and engineers are working on several promising areas:

• Photon-counting CT: May offer higher resolution and lower radiation doses
• 4D CT imaging: Could provide real-time visualization of moving organs
• Molecular imaging CT: May allow for visualization of cellular and molecular processes
• Further AI integration: Could lead to faster, more accurate diagnoses and personalized treatment planning

These advancements aim to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce radiation exposure, and expand the clinical applications of CT scanning, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and more personalized medical care.

Acquired Apraxia of Speech

Allison, K. M., Cordella, C., Iuzzini-Seigel, J., & Green, J. R. (2020). Differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech in children and adults: A scoping review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(9), 2952–2994. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00061

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). Scope of practice in speech-language pathology [Scope of practice]. www.asha.org/policy/

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2023). Code of ethics [Ethics]. www.asha.org/policy/

Austermann Hula, S. N., Robin, D. A., Maas, E., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Effects of feedback frequency and timing on acquisition, retention, and transfer of speech skills in acquired apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(5), 1088–1113. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/06-0042)

Ballard, K. J. (2001). Response generalization in apraxia of speech treatments: Taking another look. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34(1–2), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(00)00038-1

Ballard, K. J., Tourville, J., & Robin, D. A. (2014). Behavioral, computational, and neuroimaging studies of acquired apraxia of speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00892

Ballard, K. J., Wambaugh, J. L., Duffy, J. R., Layfield, C., Maas, E., Mauszycki, S., & McNeil, M. R. (2015). Treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: A systematic review of intervention research between 2004 and 2012. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(2), 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0118

Bislick, L. P., Weir, P. C., Spencer, K., Kendall, D., & Yorkston, K. M. (2012). Do principles of motor learning enhance retention and transfer of speech skills? A systematic review. Aphasiology, 26(5), 709–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.676888

Bose, A., Square, P. A., Schlosser, R., & van Lieshout, P. (2001). Effects of PROMPT therapy on speech motor function in a person with aphasia and apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 15(8), 767–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000186

Brendel, B., & Ziegler, W. (2008). Effectiveness of metrical pacing in the treatment of apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 22(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600965464

Chumpelik, D. (1984). The PROMPT system of therapy: Theoretical framework and applications for developmental apraxia of speech. Seminars in Speech and Language, 5(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1085172

Duffy, J. R. (2006). Apraxia of speech in degenerative neurologic disease. Aphasiology, 20(6), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600597358

Duffy, J. R. (2013). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. Mosby.

Duffy, J. R., & McNeil, M. R. (2008). Primary progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (pp. 543–564). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Duffy, J. R., Peach, R. K., & Strand, E. A. (2007). Progressive apraxia of speech as a sign of motor neuron disease. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(3), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2007/025)

Duffy, J. R., Strand, E. A., & Josephs, K. A. (2014). Motor speech disorders associated with primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology, 28(8–9), 1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.869307

Duffy, J. R., Utianski, R. L., & Josephs, K. A. (2020). Primary progressive apraxia of speech: From recognition to diagnosis and care. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1787732

Dworkin, J. P., Abkarian, G. G., & Johns, D. F. (1988). Apraxia of speech: The effectiveness of a treatment regimen. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53(3), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5303.280

Freed, D. B., Marshall, R. C., & Frazier, K. E. (1997). Long-term effectiveness of PROMPT treatment in a severely apractic-aphasic speaker. Aphasiology, 11(4–5), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039708248477

Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224

Haley, K. L., Cunningham, K. T., Jacks, A., Richardson, J. D., Harmon, T., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2020). Repeated word production is inconsistent in both aphasia and apraxia of speech. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. https://doi. org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1727837

Haley, K. L., Jacks, A., de Riesthal, M., Abou-Khalil, R., & Roth, H. L. (2012). Toward a quantitative basis for assessment and diagnosis of apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(5), S1502–S1517. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0318)

Haley, K. L., Jacks, A., Richardson, J. D., & Wambaugh, J. L. (2017). Perceptually salient sound distortions and apraxia of speech: A performance continuum. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(2S), 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0103

Henry, M. L., Hubbard, H. I., Grasso, S. M., Mandelli, M. L., Wilson, S. M., Sathishkumar, M. T., Fridriksson, J., Daigle, W., Boxer, A. L., Miller, B. L., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2018). Retraining speech production and fluency in non-fluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia. Brain, 141(6), 1799–1814. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy101

Holland, A. , Milman, L., Munoz, M., & Bays, G. (2002, June). Scripts in the management of aphasia [Paper presentation]. World Federation of Neurology Aphasia and Cognitive Disorders Section Meeting, Villefranche, France.

Howard, S., & Varley, R. (1995). III: EPG in therapy using electropalatography to treat severe acquired apraxia of speech. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30(2), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829509082535

Jung, Y., Duffy, J. R., & Josephs, K. A. (2013). Primary progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech. Seminars in Neurology, 33(4), 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1359317

Katz, W. F., Bharadwaj, S. V., & Carstens, B. (1999). Electromagnetic articulography treatment for an adult with Broca’s aphasia and apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(6), 1355–1366. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4206.1355

Katz, W. F., McNeil, M. R., & Garst, D. M. (2010). Treating apraxia of speech (AOS) with EMA-supplied visual augmented feedback. Aphasiology, 24(6–8), 826–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030903518176

Knock, T. R., Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2000). Influence of order of stimulus presentation on speech motor learning: A principled approach to treatment for apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 14(5–6), 653–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870300401379

Lasker, J. P., & Bedrosian, J. L. (2001). Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17(3), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/aac.17.3.141.153

Lasker, J. P., Stierwalt, J. A. G., Hageman, C. F., & LaPointe, L. L. (2008). Using motor learning guided theory and augmentative and alternative communication to improve speech production in profound apraxia: A case example. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 16(4), 225–233.

Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Austermann Hula, S. N., Freedman, S. E., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(3), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025)

Marangolo, P., Marinelli, C. V., Bonifazi, S., Fiori, V., Ceravolo, M. G., Provinciali, L., & Tomaiuolo, F. (2011). Electrical stimulation over the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) determines long-term effects in the recovery of speech apraxia in three chronic aphasics. Behavioural Brain Research, 225(2), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.08.008

Martin, V. C., Kubitz, K. R., & Maher, L. M. (2001). Melodic intonation therapy. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 11(3), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1044/nnsld11.3.33

Mauszycki, S. C., & Wambaugh, J. L. (2008). The effects of rate control treatment on consonant production accuracy in mild apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 22(7–8), 906–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701800818

Mauszycki, S. C., & Wambaugh, J. L. (2011, May). Acquired apraxia of speech: A treatment overview. The ASHA Leader, 16(5), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTR2.16052011.16

McNeil, M. R., Pratt, S. R., & Fossett, T. R. (2004). The differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech. In B. Maassen, R. Kent, H. Peters, P. van Lieshout, & W. Hulstijn (Eds.), Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech (pp. 389–413). Oxford University Press.

McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2009). Apraxia of speech: Definition and differential diagnosis (2nd ed.). In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (pp. 249–268). Thieme.

Odell, K. H. (2002). Considerations in target selection in apraxia of speech treatment. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23(4), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35803

Rosenbek, J., Lemme, M., Ahern, M., Harris, N., & Wertz, T. (1973). A treatment for apraxia of speech in adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38(4), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.3804.462

Schor, A., Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2012). A motor learning perspective on phonetic syllable kinships: How training effects transfer from learned to new syllables in severe apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 26(7), 880–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.660458

Simpson, M. B., & Clark, A. R. (1989). Clinical management of apractic mutism. In P. Square-Storer (Ed.), Acquired apraxia of speech in aphasic adults (pp. 241–266). Taylor & Francis.

Sparks, R., Helm, N. , & Albert, M. (1974). Aphasia rehabilitation resulting from melodic intonation therapy. Cortex, 10(4), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(74)80024-9

Sparks, R., & Holland, A. (1976). Method: Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41(3), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4103.287

Stevens, E. R. (1989). Multiple input phoneme therapy. In P. Square-Storer (Ed.), Acquired apraxia of speech in aphasic adults (pp. 220–238). Taylor & Francis.

Stevens, E. R., & Glaser, L. E. (1983). Multiple input phoneme therapy: An approach to severe apraxia and expressive aphasia. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings (pp. 148–155). BRK Publishers.

van der Merwe, A. (2011). A speech motor learning approach to treating apraxia of speech: Rationale and effects of intervention with an adult with acquired apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 25(10), 1174–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.582246

Wambaugh, J. L., Kalinyak-Fliszar, M. M., West, J. E., & Doyle, P. J. (1998). Effects of treatment for sound errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(4), 725–743. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4104.725

Wambaugh, J. L., & Mauszycki, S. C. (2010). Sound production treatment: Application with severe apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 24(6–8), 814–825. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/02687030903422494

Wambaugh, J. L., Nessler, C., Wright, S., & Mauszycki, S. (2014). Sound production treatment: Effects of blocked and random practice. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0072

Wambaugh, J. L., Nessler, C., Wright, S., Mauszycki, S., & DeLong, C. (2016). Sound production treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: Effects of blocked and random practice on multisyllabic word production. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(5), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1101161

Wertz, R. T., LaPointe, L. L., & Rosenbek, J. C. (1984). Apraxia of speech in adults: The disorder and its management. Grune & Stratton.

World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42407

Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382–1414. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9

Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., Strand, E. A., & Hakel, M. (2010). Management of motor speech disorders in children and adults. Pro-Ed.

Youmans, G., Youmans, S. R., & Hancock, A. B. (2011). Script training treatment for adults with apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0085)

Ziegler, W., Aichert, I., & Staiger, A. (2010). Syllable- and rhythm-based approaches in the treatment of apraxia of speech. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 20(3), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1044/nnsld20.3.59

Zumbansen, A., Peretz, I., & Hébert, S. (2014). Melodic intonation therapy: Back to basics for future research. Frontiers in Neurology, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00007

cascan test｜TikTok Search

TikTok

Upload

hovacat

Hova

game is called Scan_Test.DEMO #roblox #robloxhorror #robloxscary #lidar

348. 1K Likes, 2K Comments. TikTok video from Hova (@hovacat): “game is called Scan_Test.DEMO #roblox #robloxhorror #robloxscary #lidar”. original sound – Hova.

2.6M views|

original sound – Hova

its_mollyhere

♡

I don’t know if they likked it or not 🙁 #roblox #scantestdemo #fyp #foryou

264 Likes, TikTok video from ♡ (@its_mollyhere): “I don’t know if they likked it or not 🙁 #roblox #scantestdemo #fyp #foryou”. originalljud – ♡.

11.2K views|

originalljud – ♡

corejason

CoreJason

⚠️ warning ⚠️ scan_test.demo can cause nausea and discomfort #blowup? #fypdongggggggg #indonesia #fyp #foryoupage #blowitup #blowitup #blowitup #roblox #fypシ゚viral #worldcup #WORLDCUP #2022 #wierd #game

1. 4K Likes, TikTok video from CoreJason (@corejason): “⚠️ warning ⚠️ scan_test.demo can cause nausea and discomfort #blowup? #fypdongggggggg #indonesia #fyp #foryoupage #blowitup #blowitup #blowitup #roblox #fypシ゚viral #worldcup #WORLDCUP #2022 #wierd #game”. Strangest games on roblox pt. 1 | Scan_test.DEMO
objective : Scan rooms around and find creppy stuff | A dream you’ve never had before
objective : going up endless staircase and wierd things star to happen Divine Hell – Lemuel Tay.

20.4K views|

Divine Hell – Lemuel Tay

hovacat

Hova

🗣what’s the lidar games name #roblox #robloxhorror #robloxscary #lidar #indiehorrorgame

3.3K Likes, 21 Comments. TikTok video from Hova (@hovacat): “🗣what’s the lidar games name #roblox #robloxhorror #robloxscary #lidar #indiehorrorgame”. original sound – Hova.

69.9K views|

original sound – Hova

goldtiokit_

Joenana

#Joenana #roblox #scantestdemo

2.2K Likes, 62 Comments. TikTok video from Joenana (@goldtiokit_): “#Joenana #roblox #scantestdemo”. meepcity avatar them – 彡☆Sousou★.

50K views|

meepcity avatar them – 彡☆Sousou★

xshayduhx

Shay 💕

This case is C-R-A-Z-Y!#maddie #madeleinemccann #madeleine #help #awareness #julia #case #parents #dna #test #isthisher #fyp #foryou #spreadawareness #tag #sharetofriendsandfamily #2023 #helpfindmaddie #sharetofriendsplease #helpus #foryoupageofficially

142. 4K Likes, 161 Comments. TikTok video from Shay 💕 (@xshayduhx): “This case is C-R-A-Z-Y!#maddie #madeleinemccann #madeleine #help #awareness #julia #case #parents#dna #test #isthisher #fyp #foryou #spreadawareness #tag #sharetofriendsandfamily #2023 #helpfindmaddie #sharetofriendsplease #helpus #foryoupageofficially”. BIG UPDATE!⛔️ | As we know ,Julia requested a DNA test … | Madeleines parents responded and agreed to the test…Do maddie parents know more than we do ? Creepy and simple horror background music(1070744) – howlingindicator.

6.5M views|

Creepy and simple horror background music(1070744) – howlingindicator

pflegeinfosion

Denise

Diagnostik Urin-Stick🔎 Anzeige #pflegeinfosion #urin #testkit #nährstoffe #analyse #fyp #cascflow #teststreifen #wohlbefindensteigern #gesünderleben

11. 4K Likes, 306 Comments. TikTok video from Denise (@pflegeinfosion): “Diagnostik Urin-Stick🔎 Anzeige #pflegeinfosion #urin #testkit #nährstoffe #analyse #fyp #cascflow #teststreifen #wohlbefindensteigern #gesünderleben”. Diagnostik 🔎
Urin-Stick🚽
Nährstoff-analyse von zu hause Originalton – Denise.

3.3M views|

Originalton – Denise

iis99c

✮IIS99C™⋆｡°

#fyp #pourtoi #foryou #fz150

582 Likes, 27 Comments. TikTok video from ✮IIS99C™⋆｡° (@iis99c): “#fyp #pourtoi #foryou #fz150”. Testing fake fz150 since I’m too broke to afford it | I will be cleaning my mom’s shoes to test it | When I see the foam, I’m in the zone | … God Race (Temptation Stairway) – Metaroom.

44.6K views|

God Race (Temptation Stairway) – Metaroom

bfisbq

vudiar

Stability test porsche edition 🇩🇪🇩🇪
#porsche #testcar #porsche #supercars #porschetest #crashtest

863 Likes, TikTok video from vudiar (@bfisbq): “Stability test porsche edition 🇩🇪🇩🇪 #porsche #testcar #porsche #supercars #porschetest #crashtest”. Porsche edition 🇩🇪 | Stability test | Tycan | … original sound – Yo.

46.5K views|

original sound – Yo

To cook manti, you need a manti-kaskan, it is also a mantyshnitsa or …: red_cat — LiveJournal

To cook manti, you need a manti-kaskan, it is also a mantyshnitsa or a pressure cooker. It is a construction of two pans, the top without a bottom, four grates with holes and a protrusion in the center are inserted into it, on which the next grate rests, the lid is on top. Another variety is five pans inserted into each other, the lower one is large ordinary, the upper 4 are low and perforated. Top of the lid. By the way, that’s exactly what I have, I’ll take a picture later. I heard that someone manages to cook manti in a double boiler and even in a colander placed on an ordinary pan and covered with a lid, but I have not seen these people with my own eyes.

It’s easy. I take lamb (or beef), pulp with fat, about half a kilo, and chop into minced meat. How? With a fillet knife, cut off a thin long layer of meat, cut into thin strips along, unfold for convenience, cut (chopped) across. It turns out meat cubes with a face of a millimeter and a half or two, depending on how lazy you are. Onion, as much as was taken, finely cut. Greens (dill, parsley, cilantro, if there are lovers), again finely chop (cut). Mix everything, add salt, crushed black pepper (a lot). If the stuffing comes out dry, it makes sense to add a) a little chopped bacon or b) finely chopped zucchini, pumpkin.

Next is the dough. Flour, water, salt. You can curse me and annoy me, but I make a simple cool dough by eye and touch, without measuring the proportions. I just pour a little, a glass or two according to sensations, flour into a voluminous bowl (I’ll take a picture later), add a pinch of salt and cold water – well, half a glass, let’s say. I mix well and, continuing to knead, I begin to gradually add flour. Continuing to knead. Quiet until the dough becomes firm and elastic. Tight, you know? Not “like the belly of a sleeping cat” (this definition is suitable for yeast dough). denser. It makes sense to beat the dough on the table – pick it up and drop it back with force, only without fanaticism, ten times is enough.

Then flatten the dough into a thick “sausage”, cut off (tear off) proportionate pieces and roll out on a table lightly powdered with flour. Also wipe the rolling pin with flour. Roll out thinly, aiming for a square in shape. Cut the rolled out layer of dough with a knife into squares, I usually get 9 pieces from one layer, each with a side of 12-14 centimeters.

Continue sculpting. Minced meat in the center, connect the corners of the square in the center above the minced meat, pinch, and also pinch the edges of the dough brought together. It turns out such a plump “envelope”. Bring together the corners of the “envelope” in pairs, pinch. You get a boat. The process, if it is not clear described, I will then take a picture, is it necessary?

There you go. Now you put the finished manti on the grids of the upper pan (pots) greased with vegetable oil, and in the lower one you already have boiling water (salted, with a couple of allspice peas and herbs and spices to taste). Reduce the fire, stack all the pans (grids) on top of each other, top with a lid. Boil half an hour – 40 minutes. Serve, laying out on a larger dish, eat with your hands, with sour cream, sour cream with garlic and herbs, with tzatziki (why not), some people eat with vinegar.

Filling options: minced meat in half with white cabbage stewed in a saucepan (with cumin, in vegetable oil), vegetables – from cabbage and onions, and (or) zucchini, and (or) pumpkin (everything in a crowd, again, darken in a saucepan – well, like on pies, say), from potatoes, onions, herbs, garlic (boil potatoes, mash in mashed potatoes with an egg, add stewed finely chopped onions, chopped garlic and herbs, salt and pepper). If the filling is only vegetable, you can also add one egg to the dough.

MANTI very tasty! Mantovarka KASKAN! food (tv genre) recipe what to cook for the new year

12+

1 year and 4 months ago

Pleasant Minute35 followers

throw something in turn into the pan 🍲 or stir so that it doesn’t burn 🥘 – then they come to the rescue MANTY 🥟 – satisfying, tasty and convenient!
Grocery list:
1. 3 chicken legs
2. 3 medium potatoes.
3. 2-3 medium bulbs.
4. 250 ml of boiled water at room temperature.
5. 500-600 gr – flour.
6. Salt, pepper.
Cooking method.
For filling:
Cut the chicken meat into cubes, separating the potatoes from the bones and cubes. Add chopped onion smaller than meat and potatoes to the filling. Salt and pepper to taste.
For test:
Dilute 1 tsp of salt in water. Then add flour and knead the dough until it sticks to the board and hands.
We form a sausage from the dough, cut it into portioned pieces, roll them out with a rolling pin, apply the filling, fix it and put it in a pressure cooker pre-lubricated with butter.
From the moment of boiling, cook for 40-60 minutes. Juicy steam manty is ready!
🧾 MY SITE WITH RECIPES https://rutube.ru/channel/24344077/
SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL AND FOLLOW THE NEWS: https://rutube.ru/channel/24344077/
👩🍳 MY CHANNEL https://rutube.ru/channel/24344077/
🔥🔥🔥 THE HOTEST PLAYLISTS OF MY COOKING CHANNEL 🔥🔥🔥
✅ DELICIOUS FOOD https://rutube.ru/plst/75422
✅ BREAKFASTS https://rutube.ru/plst/75447
✅ 1 DISH https://rutube.ru/plst/75426
✅ SALADS https://rutube.ru/plst/75425
✅ porridge https://rutube.ru/plst/75432
✅ BAKING https://rutube.ru/plst/75435
✅ FISH DISHES https://rutube.ru/plst/75442
✅ DESSERTS https://rutube.ru/plst/75449✅ AUTHOR’S RECIPES PLEASANT MINUTE https://rutube.ru/plst/75429
📣 TELEGRAM https://t.me/priytnayminutka
✦ YANDEX.ZEN https://zen.yandex.ru/id/5dfc50d93d5f6900ad7e583c
📸 INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/priytnayminutka
🐤 TWITTER https://twitter.com/priytnayminutka
*****************************************
version for English-speaking friends

When you stand at the stove and do not want to follow its preparation,
something in turn to throw in a pan or stir so as not to burn something come to help they are DUMPLINGS-a hearty and tasty!

product list:
3 chicken legs
3 medium potatoes.