About all

The Cascan Test: Understanding CT Scans and Their Diagnostic Capabilities

by alexxlab

What is a CT scan? What does the Cascan test detect and how does it work? Explore the details of this important medical imaging technique.

Understanding the Cascan Test: What is a CT Scan?

A CT (Computed Tomography) scan, also known as a Cascan test, is a medical imaging procedure that uses X-rays and computer technology to create detailed, three-dimensional images of the inside of the body. Unlike traditional X-rays, which provide a two-dimensional view, CT scans can capture cross-sectional images of organs, bones, blood vessels, and other structures, allowing healthcare providers to better visualize and evaluate various medical conditions.

What Does the Cascan Test Detect?

The Cascan test, or CT scan, is a versatile diagnostic tool that can be used to detect a wide range of medical conditions and abnormalities. Some of the key things that a CT scan can detect include:

  • Cancers: CT scans can help identify and monitor various types of cancer, including lung, liver, kidney, and brain cancers.
  • Cardiovascular issues: CT scans can provide detailed images of the heart and blood vessels, helping to diagnose conditions like coronary artery disease, heart valve problems, and aortic aneurysms.
  • Bone and joint problems: CT scans can reveal fractures, degenerative changes, and other issues affecting the bones and joints.
  • Internal injuries: CT scans can be used to assess the extent of internal injuries, such as those resulting from trauma or accidents.
  • Infections: CT scans can help detect and monitor the progression of infectious diseases, particularly in the lungs and abdominal region.

How Does the Cascan Test Work?

The Cascan test, or CT scan, uses a series of X-ray images to create a detailed, three-dimensional image of the body. During the procedure, the patient lies on a table that slides into a large, donut-shaped machine called a CT scanner. The scanner rotates around the patient, taking multiple X-ray images from different angles. These images are then processed by a computer, which assembles them into a comprehensive, cross-sectional view of the targeted area.

The CT scanner uses a narrow, fan-shaped beam of X-rays to capture the images, which are then digitized and displayed on a computer monitor. Radiologists and other healthcare providers can then analyze these images to identify any abnormalities or areas of concern.

Preparing for a Cascan Test

Before undergoing a CT scan, patients may be asked to follow certain instructions to ensure the best possible results. This may include:

  • Avoiding certain medications or supplements for a period of time prior to the scan
  • Fasting for a specific period, particularly if the scan is focused on the abdomen or digestive system
  • Drinking a contrast agent, which can help enhance the visibility of certain structures during the scan
  • Wearing comfortable, loose-fitting clothing without any metal objects, such as zippers or buttons

Patients should also inform their healthcare provider of any known allergies, as the contrast agent used in some CT scans can cause reactions in some individuals.

The Benefits of the Cascan Test

The Cascan test, or CT scan, offers several key benefits for healthcare providers and patients:

  • Detailed, three-dimensional imaging: CT scans provide a more comprehensive and detailed view of the body’s internal structures compared to traditional X-rays.
  • Faster diagnosis and treatment: The detailed images from a CT scan can help healthcare providers quickly identify and diagnose a wide range of medical conditions, leading to faster, more effective treatment.
  • Versatility: CT scans can be used to examine various parts of the body, including the head, chest, abdomen, and limbs, making them a valuable tool for a wide range of medical needs.
  • Increased accuracy: The high-quality images produced by CT scans can help healthcare providers make more accurate diagnoses and develop more effective treatment plans.

Potential Risks and Limitations of the Cascan Test

While the Cascan test, or CT scan, is a highly valuable diagnostic tool, it is important to be aware of its potential risks and limitations:

  • Radiation exposure: CT scans do involve exposure to ionizing radiation, which can increase the risk of cancer over time, particularly with repeated scans. Healthcare providers carefully weigh the benefits and risks to ensure that the scan is necessary and appropriate.
  • Contrast agent reactions: Some CT scans require the use of a contrast agent, which can cause allergic reactions or other side effects in some patients.
  • Limited visibility of certain structures: While CT scans provide excellent imaging of many internal structures, they may not be as effective for visualizing certain areas, such as the soft tissues of the body.
  • Cost: CT scans can be more expensive than other imaging tests, such as traditional X-rays or ultrasounds, which may limit their accessibility for some patients.

Interpreting the Results of a Cascan Test

The results of a Cascan test, or CT scan, are typically interpreted by a radiologist, who is a medical specialist trained in the interpretation of medical imaging. The radiologist will carefully analyze the images and provide a detailed report to the patient’s healthcare provider, outlining any abnormalities or areas of concern that were identified.

It is important to note that the interpretation of CT scan results requires a high level of expertise and can be complex, as the images may not always clearly indicate the underlying cause of a medical condition. Healthcare providers work closely with radiologists to ensure that the results are properly understood and that the appropriate next steps are taken in the patient’s care.

The Future of the Cascan Test

As medical technology continues to advance, the Cascan test, or CT scan, is likely to become even more sophisticated and versatile. Some potential future developments in CT scanning include:

  • Improved image quality and resolution: Advancements in scanner technology and software algorithms may lead to even higher-quality, more detailed images.
  • Reduced radiation exposure: New techniques and technologies may help reduce the amount of radiation used in CT scans, making them safer for patients.
  • Faster scan times: Improvements in scanner hardware and software may allow for faster, more efficient CT scans, reducing the time patients have to spend in the scanner.
  • Increased integration with other technologies: CT scans may become more integrated with other medical imaging techniques, such as MRI and PET scans, to provide a more comprehensive view of a patient’s health.

As the Cascan test, or CT scan, continues to evolve, it is likely to play an increasingly important role in the early detection, diagnosis, and management of a wide range of medical conditions, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and quality of life.

Acquired Apraxia of Speech

Allison, K. M., Cordella, C., Iuzzini-Seigel, J., & Green, J. R. (2020). Differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech in children and adults: A scoping review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(9), 2952–2994. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00061

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). Scope of practice in speech-language pathology [Scope of practice]. www.asha.org/policy/

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2023). Code of ethics [Ethics]. www.asha.org/policy/

Austermann Hula, S. N., Robin, D. A., Maas, E., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Effects of feedback frequency and timing on acquisition, retention, and transfer of speech skills in acquired apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(5), 1088–1113. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/06-0042)

Ballard, K. J. (2001). Response generalization in apraxia of speech treatments: Taking another look. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34(1–2), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(00)00038-1

Ballard, K. J., Tourville, J., & Robin, D. A. (2014). Behavioral, computational, and neuroimaging studies of acquired apraxia of speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00892

Ballard, K. J., Wambaugh, J. L., Duffy, J. R., Layfield, C., Maas, E., Mauszycki, S., & McNeil, M. R. (2015). Treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: A systematic review of intervention research between 2004 and 2012. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(2), 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0118

Bislick, L. P., Weir, P. C., Spencer, K., Kendall, D., & Yorkston, K. M. (2012). Do principles of motor learning enhance retention and transfer of speech skills? A systematic review. Aphasiology, 26(5), 709–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.676888

Bose, A., Square, P. A., Schlosser, R., & van Lieshout, P. (2001). Effects of PROMPT therapy on speech motor function in a person with aphasia and apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 15(8), 767–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000186

Brendel, B., & Ziegler, W. (2008). Effectiveness of metrical pacing in the treatment of apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 22(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600965464

Chumpelik, D. (1984). The PROMPT system of therapy: Theoretical framework and applications for developmental apraxia of speech. Seminars in Speech and Language, 5(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1085172

Duffy, J. R. (2006). Apraxia of speech in degenerative neurologic disease. Aphasiology, 20(6), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600597358

Duffy, J. R. (2013). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. Mosby.

Duffy, J. R., & McNeil, M. R. (2008). Primary progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (pp. 543–564). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Duffy, J. R., Peach, R. K., & Strand, E. A. (2007). Progressive apraxia of speech as a sign of motor neuron disease. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(3), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2007/025)

Duffy, J. R., Strand, E. A., & Josephs, K. A. (2014). Motor speech disorders associated with primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology, 28(8–9), 1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.869307

Duffy, J. R., Utianski, R. L., & Josephs, K. A. (2020). Primary progressive apraxia of speech: From recognition to diagnosis and care. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1787732

Dworkin, J. P., Abkarian, G. G., & Johns, D. F. (1988). Apraxia of speech: The effectiveness of a treatment regimen. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53(3), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5303.280

Freed, D. B., Marshall, R. C., & Frazier, K. E. (1997). Long-term effectiveness of PROMPT treatment in a severely apractic-aphasic speaker. Aphasiology, 11(4–5), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039708248477

Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224

Haley, K. L., Cunningham, K. T., Jacks, A., Richardson, J. D., Harmon, T., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2020). Repeated word production is inconsistent in both aphasia and apraxia of speech. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. https://doi. org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1727837

Haley, K. L., Jacks, A., de Riesthal, M., Abou-Khalil, R., & Roth, H. L. (2012). Toward a quantitative basis for assessment and diagnosis of apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(5), S1502–S1517. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0318)

Haley, K. L., Jacks, A., Richardson, J. D., & Wambaugh, J. L. (2017). Perceptually salient sound distortions and apraxia of speech: A performance continuum. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(2S), 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0103

Henry, M. L., Hubbard, H. I., Grasso, S. M., Mandelli, M. L., Wilson, S. M., Sathishkumar, M. T., Fridriksson, J., Daigle, W., Boxer, A. L., Miller, B. L., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2018). Retraining speech production and fluency in non-fluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia. Brain, 141(6), 1799–1814. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy101

Holland, A. , Milman, L., Munoz, M., & Bays, G. (2002, June). Scripts in the management of aphasia [Paper presentation]. World Federation of Neurology Aphasia and Cognitive Disorders Section Meeting, Villefranche, France.

Howard, S., & Varley, R. (1995). III: EPG in therapy using electropalatography to treat severe acquired apraxia of speech. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30(2), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829509082535

Jung, Y., Duffy, J. R., & Josephs, K. A. (2013). Primary progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech. Seminars in Neurology, 33(4), 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1359317

Katz, W. F., Bharadwaj, S. V., & Carstens, B. (1999). Electromagnetic articulography treatment for an adult with Broca’s aphasia and apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(6), 1355–1366. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4206.1355

Katz, W. F., McNeil, M. R., & Garst, D. M. (2010). Treating apraxia of speech (AOS) with EMA-supplied visual augmented feedback. Aphasiology, 24(6–8), 826–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030903518176

Knock, T. R., Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2000). Influence of order of stimulus presentation on speech motor learning: A principled approach to treatment for apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 14(5–6), 653–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870300401379

Lasker, J. P., & Bedrosian, J. L. (2001). Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17(3), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/aac.17.3.141.153

Lasker, J. P., Stierwalt, J. A. G., Hageman, C. F., & LaPointe, L. L. (2008). Using motor learning guided theory and augmentative and alternative communication to improve speech production in profound apraxia: A case example. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 16(4), 225–233.

Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Austermann Hula, S. N., Freedman, S. E., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(3), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025)

Marangolo, P., Marinelli, C. V., Bonifazi, S., Fiori, V., Ceravolo, M. G., Provinciali, L., & Tomaiuolo, F. (2011). Electrical stimulation over the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) determines long-term effects in the recovery of speech apraxia in three chronic aphasics. Behavioural Brain Research, 225(2), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.08.008

Martin, V. C., Kubitz, K. R., & Maher, L. M. (2001). Melodic intonation therapy. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 11(3), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1044/nnsld11.3.33

Mauszycki, S. C., & Wambaugh, J. L. (2008). The effects of rate control treatment on consonant production accuracy in mild apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 22(7–8), 906–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701800818

Mauszycki, S. C., & Wambaugh, J. L. (2011, May). Acquired apraxia of speech: A treatment overview. The ASHA Leader, 16(5), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTR2.16052011.16

McNeil, M. R., Pratt, S. R., & Fossett, T. R. (2004). The differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech. In B. Maassen, R. Kent, H. Peters, P. van Lieshout, & W. Hulstijn (Eds.), Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech (pp. 389–413). Oxford University Press.

McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2009). Apraxia of speech: Definition and differential diagnosis (2nd ed.). In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (pp. 249–268). Thieme.

Odell, K. H. (2002). Considerations in target selection in apraxia of speech treatment. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23(4), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35803

Rosenbek, J., Lemme, M., Ahern, M., Harris, N., & Wertz, T. (1973). A treatment for apraxia of speech in adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38(4), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.3804.462

Schor, A., Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2012). A motor learning perspective on phonetic syllable kinships: How training effects transfer from learned to new syllables in severe apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 26(7), 880–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.660458

Simpson, M. B., & Clark, A. R. (1989). Clinical management of apractic mutism. In P. Square-Storer (Ed.), Acquired apraxia of speech in aphasic adults (pp. 241–266). Taylor & Francis.

Sparks, R., Helm, N. , & Albert, M. (1974). Aphasia rehabilitation resulting from melodic intonation therapy. Cortex, 10(4), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(74)80024-9

Sparks, R., & Holland, A. (1976). Method: Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41(3), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4103.287

Stevens, E. R. (1989). Multiple input phoneme therapy. In P. Square-Storer (Ed.), Acquired apraxia of speech in aphasic adults (pp. 220–238). Taylor & Francis.

Stevens, E. R., & Glaser, L. E. (1983). Multiple input phoneme therapy: An approach to severe apraxia and expressive aphasia. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings (pp. 148–155). BRK Publishers.

van der Merwe, A. (2011). A speech motor learning approach to treating apraxia of speech: Rationale and effects of intervention with an adult with acquired apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 25(10), 1174–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.582246

Wambaugh, J. L., Kalinyak-Fliszar, M. M., West, J. E., & Doyle, P. J. (1998). Effects of treatment for sound errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(4), 725–743. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4104.725

Wambaugh, J. L., & Mauszycki, S. C. (2010). Sound production treatment: Application with severe apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 24(6–8), 814–825. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/02687030903422494

Wambaugh, J. L., Nessler, C., Wright, S., & Mauszycki, S. (2014). Sound production treatment: Effects of blocked and random practice. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0072

Wambaugh, J. L., Nessler, C., Wright, S., Mauszycki, S., & DeLong, C. (2016). Sound production treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: Effects of blocked and random practice on multisyllabic word production. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(5), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1101161

Wertz, R. T., LaPointe, L. L., & Rosenbek, J. C. (1984). Apraxia of speech in adults: The disorder and its management. Grune & Stratton.

World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42407

Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382–1414. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9

Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., Strand, E. A., & Hakel, M. (2010). Management of motor speech disorders in children and adults. Pro-Ed.

Youmans, G., Youmans, S. R., & Hancock, A. B. (2011). Script training treatment for adults with apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0085)

Ziegler, W., Aichert, I., & Staiger, A. (2010). Syllable- and rhythm-based approaches in the treatment of apraxia of speech. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 20(3), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1044/nnsld20.3.59

Zumbansen, A., Peretz, I., & Hébert, S. (2014). Melodic intonation therapy: Back to basics for future research. Frontiers in Neurology, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00007

Credential Assembly Service: How It Works


< Back to All Articles

It’s simple. If you’re applying to law school, then you’ll be required to register with the Credential Assembly Service (CAS). The CAS is managed by the same organization that administers the LSAT, the Law School Admission Council.

The CAS is actually designed to make your life easier. It combines your transcripts, test scores, and evaluations into a single report that it sends to law schools when you apply. Plus, CAS adjusts your grades to a universal scale so that law schools can evaluate their applicants on the same basis.

What does my CAS file include?

Your online CAS file will contain:

  • A current CAS account

  • LSAT score and writing sample

  • Undergraduate transcripts

  • Letters of recommendation (optional)

  • Payment for all reports

How and when do I register?

The CAS recommends registering six weeks before you apply to law schools, but we think it can’t hurt to leave yourself a little more time than that. Aim to register in July by logging into the Law School Admission Council’s website or by filling out a paper form, which you can request online. Your subscription lasts for five years.

Read More: Find Your Law School

What happens after I register?

Next, contact your undergrad school in August to request that they send your transcript to the CAS. If you’d like to send letters of rec through CAS, too, (it’s an optional service), then download or send a hard copy of the Letter of Recommendation form to your recommenders. CAS will collect up to three letters. Your LSAT scores will automatically become a part of your report after you take them (you need at least one score on file before the CAS can start sending your reports). When you submit your application to a law school, the school will request your report from the CAS.

Is there anything else I need to know about CAS?

The fee to register for the CAS includes a report to one school. You’ll also need to pay for each additional report you send. Look into LSAC’s fee waiver program if you absolutely cannot cover the costs of taking the LSAT and CAS reports. The LSAC website has all the details about registering, paying for, and sending reports. Check the site often to make sure you’re staying on track.

You’re done! Now you can sit back and (ha!) relax.

Practice for the LSAT

Take a LSAT practice test with us under the same conditions as the real thing. You’ll get a personalized score report highlighting your strengths and areas of improvement.

START A FREE PRACTICE TEST



The Staff of The Princeton Review


For more than 40 years, students and families have trusted The Princeton Review to help them get into their dream schools. We help students succeed in high school and beyond by giving them resources for better grades, better test scores, and stronger college applications. Follow us on Twitter: @ThePrincetonRev.





Explore Graduate Programs for You

Explore our featured graduate schools & programs to find those that both match your interests and are looking for students like you.

Best Online JD Programs

Online JD programs offer flexibility, affordability, access to innovative technologies, students from a diversity of career backgrounds, and global opportunities.

Best Online MSL Programs

Master of Studies in Law (MSL) programs are for non-lawyers whose careers in their organizations will benefit from legal training even though they are not required to be practicing attorneys.

To cook manti, you need a manti-kaskan, it is also a mantyshnitsa or …: red_cat — LiveJournal

To cook manti, you need a manti-kaskan, it is also a mantyshnitsa or a pressure cooker. It is a construction of two pans, the top without a bottom, four grates with holes and a protrusion in the center are inserted into it, on which the next grate rests, the lid is on top. Another variety is five pans inserted into each other, the lower one is large ordinary, the upper 4 are low and perforated. Top of the lid. By the way, that’s exactly what I have, I’ll take a picture later. I heard that someone manages to cook manti in a double boiler and even in a colander placed on an ordinary pan and covered with a lid, but I have not seen these people with my own eyes.

It’s easy. I take lamb (or beef), pulp with fat, about half a kilo, and chop into minced meat. How? With a fillet knife, cut off a thin long layer of meat, cut into thin strips along, unfold for convenience, cut (chopped) across. It turns out meat cubes with a face of a millimeter and a half or two, depending on how lazy you are. Onion, as much as was taken, finely cut. Greens (dill, parsley, cilantro, if there are lovers), again finely chop (cut). Mix everything, add salt, crushed black pepper (a lot). If the stuffing comes out dry, it makes sense to add a) a little chopped bacon or b) finely chopped zucchini, pumpkin.

Next is the dough. Flour, water, salt. You can curse me and annoy me, but I make a simple cool dough by eye and touch, without measuring the proportions. I just pour a little, a glass or two according to sensations, flour into a voluminous bowl (I’ll take a picture later), add a pinch of salt and cold water – well, half a glass, let’s say. I mix well and, continuing to knead, I begin to gradually add flour. Continuing to knead. Quiet until the dough becomes firm and elastic. Tight, you know? Not “like the belly of a sleeping cat” (this definition is suitable for yeast dough). denser. It makes sense to beat the dough on the table – pick it up and drop it back with force, only without fanaticism, ten times is enough.

Then flatten the dough into a thick “sausage”, cut off (tear off) proportionate pieces and roll out on a table lightly powdered with flour. Also wipe the rolling pin with flour. Roll out thinly, aiming for a square in shape. Cut the rolled out layer of dough with a knife into squares, I usually get 9 pieces from one layer, each with a side of 12-14 centimeters.

Continue sculpting. Minced meat in the center, connect the corners of the square in the center above the minced meat, pinch, and also pinch the edges of the dough brought together. It turns out such a plump “envelope”. Bring together the corners of the “envelope” in pairs, pinch. You get a boat. The process, if it is not clear described, I will then take a picture, is it necessary?

There you go. Now you put the finished manti on the grids of the upper pan (pots) greased with vegetable oil, and in the lower one you already have boiling water (salted, with a couple of allspice peas and herbs and spices to taste). Reduce the fire, stack all the pans (grids) on top of each other, top with a lid. Boil half an hour – 40 minutes. Serve, laying out on a larger dish, eat with your hands, with sour cream, sour cream with garlic and herbs, with tzatziki (why not), some people eat with vinegar.

Filling options: minced meat in half with white cabbage stewed in a saucepan (with cumin, in vegetable oil), vegetables – from cabbage and onions, and (or) zucchini, and (or) pumpkin (everything in a crowd, again, darken in a saucepan – well, like on pies, say), from potatoes, onions, herbs, garlic (boil potatoes, mash in mashed potatoes with an egg, add stewed finely chopped onions, chopped garlic and herbs, salt and pepper). If the filling is only vegetable, you can also add one egg to the dough.

MANTI very tasty! Mantovarka KASKAN! food (tv genre) recipe what to cook for the new year

12+

1 year and 4 months ago

Pleasant Minute35 followers

throw something in turn into the pan 🍲 or stir so that it doesn’t burn 🥘 – then they come to the rescue MANTY 🥟 – satisfying, tasty and convenient!
Grocery list:
1. 3 chicken legs
2. 3 medium potatoes.
3. 2-3 medium bulbs.
4. 250 ml of boiled water at room temperature.
5. 500-600 gr – flour.
6. Salt, pepper.
Cooking method.
For filling:
Cut the chicken meat into cubes, separating the potatoes from the bones and cubes. Add chopped onion smaller than meat and potatoes to the filling. Salt and pepper to taste.
For test:
Dilute 1 tsp of salt in water. Then add flour and knead the dough until it sticks to the board and hands.
We form a sausage from the dough, cut it into portioned pieces, roll them out with a rolling pin, apply the filling, fix it and put it in a pressure cooker pre-lubricated with butter.
From the moment of boiling, cook for 40-60 minutes. Juicy steam manty is ready!
🧾 MY SITE WITH RECIPES https://rutube.ru/channel/24344077/
SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL AND FOLLOW THE NEWS: https://rutube.ru/channel/24344077/
👩🍳 MY CHANNEL https://rutube.ru/channel/24344077/
🔥🔥🔥 THE HOTEST PLAYLISTS OF MY COOKING CHANNEL 🔥🔥🔥
✅ DELICIOUS FOOD https://rutube.ru/plst/75422
✅ BREAKFASTS https://rutube.ru/plst/75447
✅ 1 DISH https://rutube.ru/plst/75426
✅ SALADS https://rutube.ru/plst/75425
✅ porridge https://rutube.ru/plst/75432
✅ BAKING https://rutube.ru/plst/75435
✅ FISH DISHES https://rutube.ru/plst/75442
✅ DESSERTS https://rutube.ru/plst/75449✅ AUTHOR’S RECIPES PLEASANT MINUTE https://rutube.ru/plst/75429
📣 TELEGRAM https://t.me/priytnayminutka
✦ YANDEX.ZEN https://zen.yandex.ru/id/5dfc50d93d5f6900ad7e583c
📸 INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/priytnayminutka
🐤 TWITTER https://twitter.com/priytnayminutka
*****************************************
version for English-speaking friends

When you stand at the stove and do not want to follow its preparation,
something in turn to throw in a pan or stir so as not to burn something come to help they are DUMPLINGS-a hearty and tasty!

product list:
3 chicken legs
3 medium potatoes.