Lumbar degenerative spondylosis. Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Diagnosis and Conservative Management Strategies
How is lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis diagnosed. What are the most effective conservative management approaches for this condition. Can non-surgical treatments provide relief for patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. What role does physical therapy play in managing symptoms. Are epidural steroid injections beneficial for this condition. When should surgery be considered for lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Understanding Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Causes and Risk Factors
Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis is a condition characterized by the forward slippage of one vertebra over another in the lower back. This disorder primarily affects the lumbar spine, particularly the L4-L5 segment. To fully grasp this condition, it’s crucial to understand its underlying causes and risk factors.
What causes lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis? The primary culprit is the natural aging process, which leads to the degeneration of spinal structures. As we age, the intervertebral discs lose their water content and height, causing increased stress on the facet joints. Simultaneously, the ligaments supporting the spine may become lax. These changes can result in spinal instability and the subsequent slippage of vertebrae.
Are certain individuals more prone to developing this condition? Indeed, several risk factors have been identified:
- Age: The likelihood increases with age, particularly after 50
- Gender: Women are more susceptible, especially post-menopausal women
- Genetics: Family history may play a role
- Occupation: Jobs involving repetitive lifting or bending
- Sports activities: Certain sports may increase the risk
Understanding these risk factors can help in early detection and prevention strategies. However, it’s important to note that having risk factors doesn’t necessarily mean an individual will develop the condition.
Diagnostic Approaches for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
Accurate diagnosis of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis is crucial for effective management. The diagnostic process typically involves a combination of clinical examination and imaging studies.
How do healthcare providers diagnose this condition? The process usually begins with a thorough medical history and physical examination. During the physical exam, the healthcare provider may check for:
- Pain patterns and distribution
- Range of motion limitations
- Neurological deficits
- Gait abnormalities
Which imaging studies are most useful in diagnosing lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis? Several imaging modalities play a crucial role:
- X-rays: Standing lateral X-rays are particularly useful for detecting and grading the degree of vertebral slippage.
- MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging): This provides detailed images of soft tissues, including intervertebral discs, ligaments, and neural structures.
- CT (Computed Tomography): Offers detailed bone imaging and can help assess facet joint degeneration.
Is there a gold standard for measuring the degree of slippage? The Meyerding grading system is commonly used to classify the severity of spondylolisthesis. This system grades the slippage from I to V based on the percentage of vertebral body displacement.
Conservative Management Strategies: Physical Therapy and Exercise
Conservative management is often the first line of treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Physical therapy and targeted exercises play a crucial role in managing symptoms and improving function.
What are the primary goals of physical therapy in treating this condition? The main objectives include:
- Pain reduction
- Improvement of core strength and stability
- Enhancement of flexibility
- Correction of posture and body mechanics
Which exercises are most beneficial for patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis? A comprehensive exercise program typically includes:
- Core strengthening exercises
- Lumbar stabilization techniques
- Flexibility exercises for the hamstrings and hip flexors
- Low-impact aerobic activities like swimming or stationary cycling
How effective is physical therapy in managing this condition? Studies have shown that structured physical therapy programs can significantly improve pain levels and functional outcomes in many patients. However, the effectiveness can vary depending on factors such as the severity of the condition and patient compliance.
Bracing and External Support: A Controversial Approach
The use of braces and external support devices in the management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis has been a subject of debate among healthcare professionals.
Can bracing provide relief for patients with this condition? Some studies suggest that lumbar bracing may offer temporary relief by providing external support and limiting excessive motion. However, the long-term benefits remain questionable.
What types of braces are commonly used? Braces used for lumbar spondylolisthesis include:
- Lumbosacral corsets
- Rigid orthoses
- Flexible supports
Are there potential drawbacks to long-term bracing? Prolonged use of braces may lead to muscle weakness and dependence. Therefore, bracing is often recommended as a short-term solution or in conjunction with other conservative treatments.
Pharmacological Interventions: Managing Pain and Inflammation
Medications play a significant role in the conservative management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, primarily focusing on pain relief and reducing inflammation.
Which medications are commonly prescribed for this condition? The pharmacological approach typically includes:
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
- Acetaminophen
- Muscle relaxants
- In some cases, opioids for severe pain
How effective are these medications in managing symptoms? While medications can provide significant pain relief, they don’t address the underlying structural issues. They are often used in combination with other conservative treatments for optimal results.
Are there risks associated with long-term medication use? Prolonged use of NSAIDs and opioids can lead to side effects such as gastrointestinal issues, kidney problems, and dependency. Therefore, medication use should be closely monitored by healthcare providers.
Epidural Steroid Injections: A Controversial Yet Common Intervention
Epidural steroid injections are frequently used in the management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, particularly for patients experiencing radicular pain.
How do epidural steroid injections work? These injections deliver a combination of local anesthetic and corticosteroids directly into the epidural space surrounding the affected nerve roots. The goal is to reduce inflammation and provide pain relief.
Are epidural injections effective for all patients with this condition? The efficacy of epidural injections can vary. Some studies have shown significant short-term pain relief, while others suggest limited long-term benefits. The effectiveness may depend on factors such as the precise location of nerve compression and the skill of the practitioner administering the injection.
What are the potential risks and limitations of epidural injections? While generally considered safe, epidural injections carry risks such as:
- Infection
- Bleeding
- Nerve damage (rare)
- Temporary increase in pain
Additionally, the number of injections is typically limited due to potential side effects of repeated steroid administration.
Lifestyle Modifications and Ergonomic Interventions
Lifestyle changes and ergonomic adjustments play a crucial role in the conservative management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
What lifestyle modifications can help manage symptoms? Key recommendations include:
- Weight management: Maintaining a healthy weight reduces stress on the spine
- Smoking cessation: Smoking can accelerate disc degeneration
- Activity modification: Avoiding activities that exacerbate symptoms
- Proper sleep posture: Using supportive mattresses and pillows
How can ergonomic interventions benefit patients? Ergonomic adjustments in daily activities and work environments can significantly reduce strain on the spine. This may include:
- Using proper lifting techniques
- Adjusting workstation setup
- Utilizing lumbar support in chairs
- Taking frequent breaks to change positions
Can these lifestyle changes prevent progression of the condition? While they may not reverse existing structural changes, these modifications can help manage symptoms and potentially slow the progression of the condition.
The Role of Patient Education in Conservative Management
Patient education is a crucial component of the conservative management approach for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Informed patients are better equipped to participate actively in their treatment and make necessary lifestyle adjustments.
What key points should be covered in patient education? Important topics include:
- Understanding the nature of the condition
- Recognizing symptom patterns
- Learning proper body mechanics
- Understanding the importance of compliance with treatment plans
How can healthcare providers effectively educate patients? Utilizing a combination of verbal explanations, written materials, and visual aids can enhance patient understanding. Additionally, involving family members in the education process can provide additional support for the patient.
Monitoring Progress and Adjusting Treatment Plans
Regular monitoring and assessment of patient progress are essential in the conservative management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. This allows for timely adjustments to the treatment plan as needed.
What factors should be monitored during follow-up visits? Key aspects to assess include:
- Pain levels and patterns
- Functional abilities and limitations
- Compliance with prescribed treatments
- Any new or worsening symptoms
How often should patients be re-evaluated? The frequency of follow-up visits may vary depending on the severity of symptoms and the patient’s response to treatment. Initially, more frequent visits may be necessary, with spacing increasing as symptoms improve.
Complementary and Alternative Therapies
Some patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis may seek complementary and alternative therapies as part of their conservative management plan.
Which complementary therapies are commonly used for this condition? Popular options include:
- Acupuncture
- Massage therapy
- Yoga and Pilates (with modifications)
- Chiropractic care (with caution)
Are these therapies effective in managing symptoms? The evidence for these therapies is mixed. While some patients report significant relief, scientific studies have shown variable results. It’s important for patients to discuss these options with their healthcare provider before incorporating them into their treatment plan.
The Psychological Aspect of Chronic Pain Management
The psychological impact of living with chronic pain from lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis should not be overlooked in the conservative management approach.
How does chronic pain affect mental health? Chronic pain can lead to:
- Depression
- Anxiety
- Sleep disturbances
- Decreased quality of life
What psychological interventions can be beneficial? Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction techniques have shown promise in helping patients cope with chronic pain. These approaches can help patients develop coping strategies and improve their overall quality of life.
When to Consider Surgical Intervention
While conservative management is often successful, there are cases where surgical intervention may be necessary for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
What are the indications for surgical treatment? Surgery may be considered when:
- Conservative treatments fail to provide adequate relief after 3-6 months
- There is progressive neurological deficit
- Severe or worsening pain significantly impacts quality of life
- There is evidence of cauda equina syndrome
What surgical options are available? Common surgical procedures include:
- Decompressive laminectomy
- Spinal fusion
- Minimally invasive techniques
How successful is surgery for this condition? Studies have shown that surgical intervention can provide significant relief for many patients, particularly those with neurogenic claudication. However, as with any surgery, there are risks and potential complications that need to be carefully considered.
Future Directions in Conservative Management
Research in the field of spine care continues to evolve, potentially offering new conservative management options for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in the future.
What emerging therapies show promise? Some areas of ongoing research include:
- Regenerative medicine techniques (e.g., stem cell therapy)
- Advanced imaging for more precise diagnosis and treatment planning
- Targeted drug delivery systems
- Improved bracing technologies
How might these advancements impact patient care? As our understanding of the condition improves and new technologies emerge, we may see more personalized and effective conservative management strategies. This could potentially reduce the need for surgical intervention in some cases.
The field of conservative management for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis continues to evolve, offering hope for improved outcomes and quality of life for patients dealing with this challenging condition. As research progresses, it’s crucial for healthcare providers to stay informed about the latest developments and incorporate evidence-based practices into their treatment approaches. Patients, too, play a vital role in their care by actively participating in their treatment plans and maintaining open communication with their healthcare team.
Diagnosis and conservative management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
1. Andersson GBJ. Epidemiology of spinal stenosis. In: Weinstein JN, Gordon SL, editors. Low back pain: a scientific and clinical overview. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1996. pp. 637–641. [Google Scholar]
2. Aihara T, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Moriya H, Tamaki T. Biomechanical functions of the iliolumbar ligament in L5 spondylolysis. J Orthop Sci. 2000;5:238–242. doi: 10.1007/s007760050158. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Apostolaki E, Davies AM, Evans N, Cassar-Pullicino VN. MR imaging of lumbar facet joint synovial cysts. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:615–623. doi: 10.1007/s003300050973. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Atlas SJ, Delitto A. Spinal stenosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:198–207. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000198722.70138.96. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Bell DF, Ehrlich MG, Zaleske DJ. Brace treatment for symptomatic spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:192–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Butler D, Gifford L. The concept of adverse mechanical tension in the nervous system. Part 2: examination and treatment. Physiotherapy. 1989;75:629–636. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(10)62375-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Butt S, Saifuddin A. The imaging of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:533–546. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.07.013. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Butterman GR. Treatment of lumbar disk herniation: Epidural steroid injection compared with discectomy. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86A:670–679. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Cuckler JM, Bernini PA, Wiesel SW, Booth RE, Jr, Rothman RH, Pickens GT. The use of epidural steroids in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain: a prospective, randomized, doubleblind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:63–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Danielson B, Frennerd K, Irstam L. Roentgenologic assessment of spondylolisthesis. I: a study of measurement variations. Acta Radiol. 1988;29:345–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Danielson B, Frennerd K, Selvik G, Irstram L. Roentgenologic assessment of spondylolisthesis. II: an evaluation of progression. Acta Radiol. 1989;30:65–68. doi: 10.3109/02841858909177460. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Dilke TFW, Burry HC, Grahame R. Extradural corticosteroid injection in the management of lumbar nerve root compression. BMJ. 1973;2:635–637. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Fellander-Tsai L, Micheli LJ. Treatment of spondylolysis with external electrical stimulation and bracing in adolescent athletes: a report of two cases. Clin J Sport Med. 1998;8:232–234. doi: 10.1097/00042752-199807000-00012. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine. 1997;22:2807–2812. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Fitzgerald J, Newman PH. Degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976;58:184–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Friberg O. Instability in spondylolisthesis. Orthopedics. 1991;1:463–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Fritz JM, Erhard RE, Hagen BF. Segmental instability of the lumbar spine. Phys Ther. 1998;78:889–896. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Frymoyer JW. Degenerative spondylolisthesis. In: Andersson GBJ, McNeill TW, editors. Lumbar spinal stenosis. St Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1992. [Google Scholar]
19. Frymoyer JW. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994;2:9–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Fukusaki M, Kobayashi I, Hara T, Sumikawa K. Symptoms of spinal stenosis do not improve after epidural steroid injection. Clin J Pain. 1998;14:148–151. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199806000-00010. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Gibson JN, Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2:CD001352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Gramse RR, Sinaki M, Ilstrup DM. Lumbar spondylolisthesis: a rational approach to conservative treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 1980;55:681–686. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Hall CM, Brody LT. Therapeutic exercise: moving toward function. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1999. pp. 344–345. [Google Scholar]
24. Herkowitz HN. Spine update: degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine. 1995;20:1084–1090. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00018. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, McGill SM. Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1753–1762. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.033. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Hilibrand AS, Rand N. Degenerative lumbar stenosis: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999;7:239–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Hoogmartens M, Morelle P. Epidural injection in the treatment of spinal stenosis. Acta Orthop Belg. 1987;53:409–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Jayakumar P, Nnadi C, Saifuddin A, Macsweeney E, Casey A. Dynamic degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: diagnosis with axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 2006;31:E298–E301. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000216602.98524.07. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Johnsson KE, Rosen I, Uden A. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop. 1992;279:82–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, Oha F, Ishida T, Yamane S. Non-fusion surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis using artificial ligament stabilization: surgical indication and clinical results. Spine. 2005;30:588–592. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000154766.74637.5e. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Keller TS, Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Spratt KF. Assessment of trunk function in single and multi-level spinal stenosis: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18:173–181. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00190-0. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Kostuik JP, Harrington I, Alexander D, Rand W, Evans D. Cauda equina syndrome and lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:386–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. LaBan MM, Viola SL, Femminineo AF, Taylor RS. Restless legs syndrome associated with diminished cardiopulmonary compliance and lumbar spinal stenosis: a motor concomitant of “vespers curse.” Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:384–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Leinonen V, Maatta S, Taimela S, Herno A, Kankaanpaa M, Partanen J, Hanninen O, Airaksinen O. Paraspinal muscle denervation, paradoxically good lumbar endurance, and an abnormal flexion-extension cycle in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2003;28:324–331. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200302150-00003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Lindgren K, Sihvonen T, Leino E, Pitkanen M. Exercise therapy effects on functional radiographic findings and segmental electromyographic activity in lumbar spine instability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:933–939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Magora A, Schwartz A. Relation between low back pain syndrome and X-ray findings. Lysis and olisthesis. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1980;12:47–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a meta-analysis of literature 1970–1993. Spine. 1994;19(suppl):S2256–S2265. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199410151-00002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Matsunaga S, Ijiri K, Hayashi K. Nonsurgically managed patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 10- to 18-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(Suppl):194–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. McAfee PC, DeVine JG, Chaput CD, Prybis BG, Fedder IL, Cunningham BW, Farrell DJ, Hess SJ, Vigna FE. The indications for interbody fusion cages in the treatment of spondylolisthesis: analysis of 120 cases. Spine. 2005;30(Suppl):S60–S65. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155578.62680.dd. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
40. Meyerding HW. Spondyloptosis. Surg Gynaecol Obstet. 1932;54:371–377. [Google Scholar]
41. Mierau D, Cassidy JD, McGregor M, Kirkaldy-Willis WH. A comparison of the effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain in patients with and without spondylolisthesis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1987;10:49–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. O’Sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey LT, Allison GT. Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine. 1997;22:2959–2967. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00020. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. Penning L, Wilmink JT. Posture-dependent bilateral compression of L4 or L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy: a dynamic CT-myelographic study. Spine. 1987;12:488–500. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198706000-00013. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
44. Pettine KA, Salib RM, Walker SG. External electrical stimulation and bracing for treatment of spondylolysis. A case report. Spine. 1993;18:436–439. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199303000-00005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
45. Postacchini F, Cinotti G, Perugia D. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis II. Surgical treatment. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1991;17:467–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Prateepavanich P, Thanapipatsiri S, Santisatisakul P, Somshevita P, Charoensak T. The effectiveness of lumbosacral corset in symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Med Assoc Thai. 2001;84:572–576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, Groff MW, Khoo L, Matz PG, Mummaneni P, Watters WC, 3rd, Wang J, Walters BC, Hadley MN. American association of neurological surgeons/congress of neurological surgeons guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: fusion in patients with stenosis and spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:679–685. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.6.0679. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
48. Riew KD, Yin Y, Gilula L, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Lauryssen C, Goette K. The effect of nerve-root injections on the need for operative treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82-A:1589–1593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49. Rosen CD, Kahanovitz N, Bernstein R, Viola K. A retrospective analysis of the efficacy of epidural steroid injections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;228:270–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50. Rosenberg NJ. Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Predisposing factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57:467–474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51. Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: review of current trends and controversies. Spine. 2005;30(Suppl):S71–S81. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155579.88537.8e. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
52. Simotas AC, Dorey FJ, Hansraj KK, Cammisa F. , Jr Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine. 2000;25:197–203. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200001150-00009. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
53. Sinaki M, Lutness MP, Ilstrup DM, Chu CP, Gramse RR. Lumbar spondylolisthesis: retrospective comparison and three-year follow-up of two conservative treatment programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:594–598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54. Spratt KF, Weinstein JN, Lehmann TR, Woody J, Sayre H. Efficacy of flexion and extension treatments incorporating braces for low-back pain patients with retrodisplacement, spondylolisthesis, or normal sagittal translation. Spine. 1993;18:1839–1849. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199310000-00020. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
55. Stasinopoulos D. Treatment of spondylolysis with external electrical stimulation in young athletes: a critical literature review. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38:352–354. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.010405. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
56. Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Pope MH. Lumbar segmental instability. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. [Google Scholar]
57. Taillard W. Le spondylolisthesis chez l’enfant et l’adolescent. Acta Orthop Scand. 1954;24:115–144. doi: 10.3109/17453675408988556. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
58. Tulder MW, Scholten RJ, Koes BW, Deyo RA. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine. 2000;25:2501–2513. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200010010-00013. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
59. Vibert BT, Sliva CD, Herkowitz HN. Treatment of instability and spondylolisthesis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:222–227. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000200233.99436.ea. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
60. Wang JC, Lin E, Brodke DS, Youssef JA. Epidural steroid injections for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar herniated discs. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15:269–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Birkmeyer NJ, Hilibrand AS, Herkowitz H, Cammisa FP, Albert TJ, Emery SE, Lenke LG, Abdu WA, Longley M, Errico TJ, Hu SS. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2257–2270. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070302. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
62. Wiltse LL, Winter RB. Terminology and measurement of spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983;65A:768–772. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis | Spine-health
Degenerative spondylolisthesis is Latin for “slipped vertebral body,” and it is diagnosed when one vertebra slips forward over the one below it. This condition occurs as a consequence of the general aging process in which the bones, joints, and ligaments in the spine become weak and less able to hold the spinal column in alignment.
Watch: Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Video
Degenerative spondylolisthesis is more common in people over age 50, and far more common in individuals older than 65. It is also more common in females than males by a 3:1 margin.
A degenerative spondylolisthesis typically occurs at one of two levels of the lumbar spine:
- The L4-L5 level of the lower spine (most common location)
- The L3-L4 level.
Treatment for Spondylolisthesis Video
Degenerative spondylolisthesis is relatively rare at other levels of the spine, but may occur at two levels or even three levels simultaneously.
While not as common as lumbar spondylolisthesis, cervical spondylolisthesis (in the neck) can occur. When degenerative spondylolisthesis does occur in the neck, it is usually a secondary issue to arthritis in the facet joints.
This article reviews the underlying causes, diagnosis, symptoms, and full range of surgical and non-surgical treatment options for degenerative spondylolisthesis.
advertisement
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Causes
Every level of the spine is composed of a disc in the front and paired facet joints in the back. The disc acts as a shock absorber in between the vertebrae, whereas the paired facet joints restrain motion. They allow the spine to bend forwards (flexion) and backwards (extension) but do not allow for a lot of rotation.
As the facet joints age, they can become incompetent and allow too much flexion, allowing one vertebral body to slip forward on the other.
In This Article:
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Symptoms
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Treatment
Surgery for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Video
advertisement
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Diagnosis
Degenerative spondylolisthesis is diagnosed by a spine specialist through a 3-step process:
- Medical History – primarily a review of the patient’s symptoms and what makes the symptoms better or worse.
- Physical Examination – the patient is examined for physical symptoms, such as range of motion, flexibility, any muscle weakness or neurological symptoms.
- Diagnostic Tests – if a spondylolisthesis is suspected after the medical history and physical exam, an X-ray may be done to confirm the diagnosis and/or rule out other possible causes of the patient’s symptoms. Based on the results of the X-ray, further tests may be ordered, such as an MRI scan, to gain additional insights.
More Spondylolisthesis Info:
Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
Spondylolysis
Spondylolysis Treatment
Spondylolisthesis Symptoms and Causes Video
Unlike Isthmic Spondylolisthesis, the degree of the slip of a degenerative spondylolisthesis is typically not graded as it is almost always a grade 1 or 2.
In cases of degenerative spondylolisthesis, the degenerated facet joints tend to increase in size, and enlarged facet joints then encroach upon the spinal canal that runs down the middle of the spinal column, causing lumbar spinal stenosis.
Dr. Peter Ullrich is an orthopedic surgeon who retired from practice with more than 20 years of experience specializing in spine surgery. Dr. Ullrich previously practiced as an orthopedic spine surgeon at the NeuroSpine Center of Wisconsin.
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on Twitter
- Subscribe to our newsletter
Email this article
advertisement
Editor’s Top Picks
Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis
Facet Joint Osteoarthritis
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Video
Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Video
Treatment for Spondylolisthesis Video
Spondylosis of the lumbar spine – symptoms, causes, treatment
This disease is treated by a neurologist.
Make an appointment
Share:
Spinal spondylosis is a chronic disease resulting from degenerative-dystrophic processes of the fibrous ring of the intervertebral disc. Spondylosis is one of the types of osteopathies – diseases grouped according to common characteristic features: dystrophy of the structures of the spine, pain syndrome, limitation of mobility. It affects all parts of the spinal column, but most often the lumbosacral.
CMRT specialist tells
Kuchenkov A.V.
Orthopedist • Traumatologist • Surgeon • Phlebologist • Sports doctor • 24 years of experience
Publication date: May 18, 2021
Verification date: January 10, 2023
All facts have been verified by a doctor.
Contents of the article
Causes of spondylosis
Symptoms of spondylosis of the lumbosacral spine
The initial stage of the disease is characterized by a latent course. As the pathological process progresses, symptoms appear:
- Limited mobility in the lumbar spine.
- Unpleasant sensations in the buttocks and thighs after prolonged exertion on the legs
- Back pain after prolonged static posture
Deforming spondylosis of the lumbar spine gives the following symptoms:
- Lumbar pain when turning the body, when walking down stairs
- Lameness when pain radiates to the lower extremities
Antespondylolisthesis (displacement of the vertebrae relative to each other) causes pinching of the nerves of the “cauda equina”, which is located in the lower parts of the spinal cord. In the clinical picture, neurological symptoms come to the fore:
- Severe pain in the perineum, in the legs
- Development of paresthesia – a feeling of numbness, tingling, burning below the level of damage to the spinal segment: lower back, buttocks, legs
- Increasing muscle weakness lower limbs
- Disorder of the pelvic organs: violation of the process of urination, defecation
Stages of development of spondylosis
The process of degenerative changes in intervertebral discs with the formation of osteophytes successively goes through several stages:
I stage. There are initial changes in the fibrous tissues of the intervertebral disc: cracks, fractures, decreased elasticity. Single spiny bone growths (osteophytes) do not extend beyond the vertebral bodies. Symptoms characteristic of spondylosis of the lumbosacral spine are absent, the patient may sometimes be bothered by minor pain in the lumbar region.
Stage II. Active proliferation of osteophytes continues. Mobility in the damaged spinal segment decreases, pains join, the intensity of which increases with physical exertion, hypothermia.
Stage III . Complete destruction of cartilage. Bone growths, increasing in size, merge into rough osteophyte complexes connecting two or more vertebrae. This disrupts the normal mobility of the lumbar spine. When osteophytes compress the nerve roots of the spinal cord, neurological disorders develop, aggravated by a severe pain syndrome. 9How to diagnose? x, CT, MRI can detect pathological changes in bone, cartilage, soft tissues in the early stages.
Rehabilitation of the spine: material of the specialists of the RC “Laboratory of Movement”
Go
Which doctor to contact
Mamaeva Lidia Semyonovna
Neurologist • Reflexologist • Physiotherapist • Hirudotherapist
experience 48 years
Konovalova Galina Nikolaevna
Neurologist
experience 44 years
Linkorov Yury Anatolyevich
Neurologist
experience 42 years
Charin Yury Konstantinovich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist • Vertebrologist
experience 34 years
Kuznetsova Elena Nikolaevna
Neurologist
experience 32 years
Dikhnich Oleg Anatolyevich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist
experience 31 years
Gaiduk Alexander Alexandrovich
Orthopedist • Physical therapy doctor • Physiotherapist
experience 30 years
Bodan Stanislav Mikhailovich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist
experience 27 years
Kuchenkov Alexander Viktorovich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist • Surgeon • Phlebologist • Sports doctor
experience 24 years
Samarin Oleg Vladimirovich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist • Vertebrologist
experience 24 years
Jan Anzhela Aleksandrovna
Neurologist • Reflexologist
experience 23 years
Kareva Tatyana Nikolaevna
Neurologist
experience 22 years
Tkachenko Maxim Viktorovich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist
experience 20 years
Ismailova Elvira Tagirovna
Neurologist
experience 20 years
Agumava Nino Mazharaevna
Neurologist
experience 19 years
Lysikova Tatyana Gennadievna
Neurologist • Physiotherapist
experience 19 years
Bachina Natalya Iosifovna
Neurologist
experience 19 years
Repryntseva Svetlana Nikolaevna
Neurologist
experience 18 years
Bulatsky Sergey Olegovich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist
experience 16 years
Lisin Valery Igorevich
Neurologist
experience 15 years
Shishkin Alexander Vyacheslavovich
Neurologist • Chiropractor
experience 13 years
Pivkovsky Dmitry Igorevich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist
experience 12 years
Dorofeeva Maria Sergeevna
Neurologist
experience 11 years
Filippenko Anton Olegovich
Neurologist • Reflexologist
experience 11 years
Stepanov Vladimir Vladimirovich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist • Vertebrologist
experience 10 years
Teleev Marat Sultanbekovich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist • Sports doctor
experience 10 years
Shtanko Vladislav Anatolyevich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist
experience 9 years
Amagova Tamila Magomedovna
Neurologist
experience 9 years
Miropolsky Ilya Andreevich
Neurologist
experience 9 years
Suleymanov Kurban Abbas-Ogly
Neurologist
experience 9 years
Atamuradov Toyli Atamuradovich
Orthopedist • Sports doctor • Surgeon
experience 8 years
Satieva Marina Garunovna
Neurologist
experience 7 years
Akhmedov Kazali Muradovich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist
experience 6 years
Orazmyradov Khalnazar Ataballyevich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist
experience 5 years
Sattorov Abboskhon Nodirovich
Orthopedist • Traumatologist
experience 4 years
How to treat spondylosis
Rehabilitation after spondylosis
Consequences
Prevention
Treatment and rehabilitation for spondylosis in CMRT clinics
Spondylosis lumbosacral spine, symptoms, causes and treatment
Lumbar spondylosis spine – a disease that is characterized by damage to the joints of the lower back, the growth of osteophytes. Bone formations appear mainly along the anterior edge of the vertebrae, and the lateral regions are also affected. The pathological process is associated with excessive loads, unsatisfactory physical condition of a person. In parallel with this, muscle spasm is observed, which limits mobility in the lumbosacral region. If there is no adequate treatment, then the bone growths become larger, infringe on the nerve roots and spinal cord.
The information in this section should not be used for self-diagnosis or self-treatment. In case of pain or other exacerbation of the disease, only the attending physician should prescribe diagnostic tests. For diagnosis and proper treatment, you should contact a specialist.
Symptoms of the disease, signs
The initial stage of lumbar spondylosis proceeds almost imperceptibly. In the modern rhythm of life, many people do not pay attention to the slight stiffness in movement. The further the disease develops, the more noticeable the symptoms become:
- soreness in the loins, buttocks and legs;
- lameness, intense discomfort in calf muscles;
- inability to fully bend over.
The pain gets worse in the evening, and also when trying to move more or less actively. Often a person has to take forced postures. At 2-3 stages progress:
- paresthesia;
- loss of sensitivity of the skin of the buttocks;
- Difficulty in movements of the knee joints, leg abduction in the hip joints.
With an increase in the duration of the disease, the symptoms of spondylosis of the lumbosacral spine become more acute and interfere with a normal lifestyle. In some cases, the signs of pathology intensify when the weather changes.
It is important to distinguish osteochondrosis from spondylosis. With osteochondrosis, pain with pressure on the spinous processes is not noted. And for spondylosis, this is a characteristic manifestation. When it affects the lumbosacral spine, predominantly L3-L5 suffer. Osteochondrosis in most cases affects the L5-S1 vertebrae.
Causes of lumbar spondylosis
Pathological growth of bone tissue is caused by degenerative changes that lead to a deterioration in the mobility of the spinal column. They are provoked by:
- direct and indirect injuries of the local muscle-ligament apparatus;
- prolonged stay in a physiologically incorrect position;
- dynamic loads on the muscles with obvious hypodynamia;
- infectious lesions;
- neoplasms;
- genetic predisposition;
- overweight.
Cause the development of spondylosis age-related changes in the tissues of the spine, as well as constitutional predisposition. Abnormal growth of the bone structure can be observed under the influence of oncological diseases. Both hypo- and hyperdynamia pose a certain health hazard.
Effective treatments
The prescribed therapy should take into account the special properties of the human body. Treatment methods for lumbar spondylosis are aimed at: restoring a full blood supply; improvement of the condition of cartilage tissue; elimination of pain; strengthening muscles and ligaments.
Therapy includes pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods. Among medicines positive effect is exerted by:
- NSAIDs;
- muscle relaxants;
- preparations of natural cartilage tissue components.
If the lumbar region is affected, spondylosis responds well to physiotherapeutic methods:
- acupuncture;
- ultrasound;
- paraffin packs;
- manual therapy;
- massage.
After relief of acute pain, exercise therapy is started. Therapeutic gymnastics has a restorative and healing effect.
What if the disease is not treated?!
With timely diagnosis and treatment, the prognosis is quite favorable. However, attempts to independently stop the pain syndrome or ignore the symptoms lead to the progression of the pathology. Over time:
- limbs become numb;
- mobility is sharply limited;
- muscles atrophy;
- partial or complete immobilization occurs.
Lumbar spondylosis responds well to treatment.