Small nodes. Understanding Lymph Node Staging: Comprehensive Guide to Nodal Assessment in Cancer

03.08.202312.06.2023 by alexxlab

What are the key factors in lymph node staging for cancer diagnosis. How do imaging techniques like CT and MRI aid in assessing lymph node status. What criteria determine if lymph nodes are considered abnormal or potentially malignant. How does lymph node size and morphology correlate with cancer metastasis.

Содержание

The Importance of Lymph Node Assessment in Cancer Staging

Lymph node evaluation plays a crucial role in cancer staging and prognosis. Accurate assessment of lymph node status helps determine the extent of disease spread and guides treatment decisions. This article explores the various aspects of nodal staging, including imaging techniques, size criteria, and morphological features that aid in distinguishing benign from malignant lymphadenopathy.

Imaging Techniques for Lymph Node Evaluation

Several imaging modalities are employed to assess lymph nodes in cancer patients:

Ultrasound with Color Doppler
Computed Tomography (CT)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Each technique offers unique advantages in visualizing lymph node characteristics. How do these imaging methods compare in their ability to detect nodal metastases? Ultrasound with Color Doppler provides real-time assessment of lymph node vascularity and morphology. CT excels in evaluating deep-seated nodes and offers excellent spatial resolution. MRI provides superior soft tissue contrast and can detect subtle changes in lymph node architecture.

Ultrasound and Color Doppler in Lymph Node Assessment

Ultrasound, particularly when combined with Color Doppler, has emerged as a valuable tool for evaluating superficial lymph nodes. Studies have shown its effectiveness in distinguishing benign from malignant lymphadenopathy based on various parameters:

Long-to-short axis ratio
Vascular patterns
Cortical echogenicity

The ratio of long-to-short axis diameter can be a predictor of malignancy, with a lower ratio suggesting a higher likelihood of metastatic involvement. Malignant nodes often exhibit peripheral or mixed vascularity patterns on Color Doppler, while benign nodes typically show hilar vascularity.

Size Criteria for Normal and Abnormal Lymph Nodes

Lymph node size is a critical factor in determining the likelihood of malignancy. However, size criteria vary depending on the anatomical location and imaging modality used. What are the generally accepted size thresholds for normal lymph nodes in different body regions?

Cervical nodes: Less than 10 mm in short axis
Axillary nodes: Less than 10 mm in short axis
Mediastinal nodes: Less than 10 mm in short axis on CT
Retroperitoneal nodes: Less than 10 mm in short axis
Pelvic nodes: Less than 8 mm in short axis

It’s important to note that these are general guidelines, and there can be variations based on individual patient factors and specific cancer types. Additionally, not all enlarged nodes are malignant, and normal-sized nodes can harbor metastases in some cases.

Limitations of Size-Based Criteria

While size remains an important consideration, relying solely on dimensional criteria has limitations. Studies have shown that normal-sized lymph nodes can contain metastatic deposits, particularly in certain cancer types such as lung cancer. Conversely, reactive enlargement of lymph nodes due to inflammation or infection can mimic malignancy. This underscores the need for a comprehensive assessment that considers multiple factors beyond size alone.

Morphological Features of Malignant Lymph Nodes

In addition to size, several morphological characteristics can help differentiate benign from malignant lymphadenopathy. What are the key features radiologists look for when assessing lymph node morphology?

Loss of fatty hilum
Irregular or ill-defined borders
Heterogeneous internal architecture
Extracapsular spread
Necrosis or cystic changes

The presence of these features, especially in combination, increases the suspicion for malignant involvement. However, it’s important to correlate imaging findings with clinical context and, when necessary, perform biopsy for definitive diagnosis.

Advanced Imaging Techniques in Nodal Staging

As imaging technology continues to evolve, new techniques are enhancing our ability to detect and characterize lymph node metastases. What are some of the advanced imaging methods being explored for improved nodal staging?

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
Diffusion-weighted imaging
Positron emission tomography (PET)
Lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI

These techniques aim to provide functional and molecular information about lymph nodes, potentially improving the accuracy of staging. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, for instance, can assess nodal vascularity and perfusion patterns, which may differ between benign and malignant nodes. Diffusion-weighted imaging exploits differences in water molecule diffusion to detect areas of increased cellularity associated with tumor deposits.

Cancer-Specific Considerations in Lymph Node Staging

The approach to lymph node staging can vary depending on the primary cancer type. Different malignancies have distinct patterns of lymphatic spread and may require specific imaging protocols. How does nodal assessment differ among common cancer types?

Lung Cancer

In lung cancer, mediastinal lymph node staging is crucial for determining operability and treatment planning. CT and PET-CT are commonly used for initial assessment, with mediastinoscopy often performed for definitive staging. Studies have shown that even normal-sized mediastinal nodes can harbor metastases in a significant proportion of cases, highlighting the importance of thorough evaluation.

Breast Cancer

Axillary lymph node status is a key prognostic factor in breast cancer. Ultrasound is often the first-line imaging modality for evaluating axillary nodes, with features such as cortical thickening and loss of fatty hilum raising suspicion for metastatic involvement. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become the standard of care for axillary staging in clinically node-negative patients.

Colorectal Cancer

For rectal cancer, high-resolution MRI has emerged as the preferred modality for local staging, including assessment of mesorectal lymph nodes. Studies have shown that morphological criteria, such as irregular borders and heterogeneous signal intensity, can be more predictive of nodal metastases than size alone.

Challenges and Future Directions in Lymph Node Staging

Despite advances in imaging technology, accurate lymph node staging remains challenging in many cases. What are some of the ongoing difficulties and potential future developments in this field?

Detection of micrometastases
Differentiation of reactive from malignant lymphadenopathy
Standardization of imaging protocols and reporting
Integration of artificial intelligence and radiomics

The ability to detect micrometastases, which can be present in normal-sized nodes, remains a limitation of current imaging techniques. Ongoing research is exploring novel contrast agents and molecular imaging approaches to improve sensitivity. Additionally, the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to image analysis holds promise for enhancing the accuracy and consistency of lymph node assessment.

Implications of Lymph Node Staging on Treatment and Prognosis

Accurate lymph node staging has significant implications for patient management and outcomes. How does nodal status influence treatment decisions and prognostic assessments?

The presence and extent of lymph node metastases often determine the need for adjuvant therapy, the extent of surgical resection, and overall treatment approach. In many cancers, nodal status is a key component of the TNM staging system, which guides prognostic estimates and treatment protocols. For example:

In breast cancer, the number of involved axillary nodes influences decisions about chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
In colorectal cancer, the presence of four or more positive regional lymph nodes (N2 disease) may indicate the need for more aggressive systemic therapy.
In head and neck cancers, the location and number of involved nodes can impact the extent of neck dissection and post-operative radiation fields.

Given the critical role of lymph node status in cancer management, ongoing efforts to improve the accuracy and reliability of nodal staging are essential for optimizing patient care and outcomes.

Nodal staging – PMC

1. Steinkamp HJ, Cornehl M, Hosten N, Pegios W, Vogl T, Felix R. Cervical lymphadenopathy: ratio of long to short-axis diameter as a predictor of malignancy. Br J Radiol. 1995;68:266–70. doi:10.1259/0007-1285-68-807-266. PMid:7735765. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Na DG, Lim HK, Byun HS, Kim HD, Ko YH, Baek JH. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1311–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Steinkamp HJ, Mueffelmann M, Böck JC, Thiel T, Kenzel P, Felix R. Differential diagnosis of lymph node lesions: a semiquantitataive approach with color Doppler ultrasound. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:828–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Choi MY, Lee JW, Jang KJ. Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:981–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Magarelli N, Guglielmi G, Savastano M, et al. Superficial inflammatory and primary neoplastic lymphadenopathy: diagnostic accuracy of power-Doppler sonography. Eur J Radiol. 2004;52:257–63. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.10.020. PMid:15544903. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Adibelli ZH, Unal G, Gül E, Uslu F, Koçak U, Abali Y. Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes: value of B-mode and color Doppler sonography. Eur J Radiol. 1998;28:230–4. doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(97)00174-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Schroeder RJ, Maeurer J, Gath HJ, Willam C, Hidajat N. Vascularization of reactively enlarged lymph nodes analyzed by color duplex sonography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:1090–5. doi:10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90332-4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Dorfman RE, Alpern MB, Gross BH, Sandler MA. Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. Radiology. 1991;180:319–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Magnusson, A. Size of normal retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1983;24:315–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Einstein DM, Singer AA, Chilcote WA, Desai RK. Abdominal lymphadenopathy: spectrum of CT findings. Radiographics. 1991;11:457–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Vinnicombe SJ, Norman AR, Nicolson V, Husband JE. Normal pelvic lymph nodes: evaluation with CT after bipedal lymphangiography. Radiology. 1995;194:349–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Gross BH, Glazer GM, Orringer MB, Spizarny DL, Flint A. Bronchogenic carcinoma metastatic to normal sized lymph nodes: frequency and significance. Radiology. 1988;166(1 Pt 1):71–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Kayser K, Bach S, Bülzebruck H, Vogt-Moykopf I, Probst G. Site, size and tumour involvement of resected extrapulmonary lymph nodes in lung cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1990;43:45–9. doi:10.1002/jso.2930430112. PMid:2153261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Staples CA, Müller NL, Miller RR, Evans KG, Nelems B. Mediastinal nodes in bronchogenic carcinoma: comparison between CT and mediastinoscopy. Radiology. 1988;167:367–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. McLoud TC, Bourgouin PM, Greenberg RW, et al. Bronchogenic carcinoma: analysis of staging in the mediastinum with CT by correlative lymph node mapping and sampling. Radiology. 1992;182:319–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology. 2003;227:371–7. doi:10.1148/radiol.2272011747. PMid:12732695. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Matsukuma K, Tsukamoto N, Matsuyama T, Ono M, Nakano H. Preoperative CT study of lymph nodes in cervical cancer – its correleation with histological findings. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;33:168–71. doi:10.1016/0090-8258(89)90544-1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Yang WT, Lam WW, Yu MY, Cheung TH, Metreweli C. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:759–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Scatarige JC, Fishman EK, Kuhajda FP, Taylor GA, Siegelman SS. Low attenuation nodal metastases in testicular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1983;7:682–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Barentsz JO, Jager GJ, van Vierzen PB, et al. Staging urinary bladder cancer after transurethral biopsy: value of fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1996;201:185–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Noworolski SM, Fischbein NJ, Kaplan MJ, et al. Challenges in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI imaging of cervical lymph nodes to detect metastatic disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:455–62. doi:10.1002/jmri.10280. PMid:12655585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Husband JE, Koh DM. Bladder cancer. In: Husband JE, Reznek RH, editors. Imaging in oncology. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd; 2004. pp. 343–74. [Google Scholar]

23. Gollub MJ, Castellino RA. The cistern chylli: a potential mimic of retrocrural lymphadenopathy on CT scans. Radiology. 1996;199:477–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Schreurs LM, Pultrum BB, Koopmans KP, et al. Better assessment of nodal metastases by PET/CT fusion compared to side by side PET/CT in oesophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2008;28(3B):1867–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Tiguert R, Gheiler EL, Tefilli MV, et al. Lymph node size does not correlate with the presence of prostate cancer metastasis. Urology. 1999;53:367–71. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00518-4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Golimbu M, Morales P, Al-Askari S, Brown J. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostatic cancer. J Urol. 1979;121:617–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Sohn KM, Lee JM, Lee SY, Ahn BY, Park SM, Kim KM. Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1551–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Spencer J, Golding S. CT evaluation of lymph node status at presentation of prostatic carcinoma. Br J Radiol. 1992;65:199–201. doi:10.1259/0007-1285-65-771-199. PMid:1547445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Kim SH, Choi BI, Lee HP, et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings. Radiology. 1990;175:45–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Kim SH, Kim SC, Choi BI, Han MC. Uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;190:807–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Williams AD, Cousins C, Soutter WP, et al. Detection of pelvic lymph node metastases in gynaecologic malignancy: a comparison of CT, MR imaging, and positron emission tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:343–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Fukuda H, Nakagawa T, Shibuya H. Metastases to pelvic lymph nodes from carcinoma in the pelvic cavity: diagnosis using thin section CT. Clin Radiol. 1999;54:237–42. doi:10.1016/S0009-9260(99)91158-3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Oyen RH, Van Poppel HP, Ameye FE, Van de Voorde WA, Baert AL, Baert LV. Lymph node staging of localised prostatic carcinoma with CT and CT guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: prospective study of 285 patients. Radiology. 1994;190:315–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Kostakoglu L, Leonard JP, Coleman M, Goldsmith SJ. The role of FDG-PET imaging in the management of lymphoma. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2004;2:115–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Eisenhauera EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. PMid:19097774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF, et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2491–9. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa022749. PMid:12815134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

37. Thoeny HC, Triantafyllou M, Birkhaeuser FD, et al. Combined ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging reliably detect pelvic lymph node metastases in normal-sized nodes of bladder and prostate cancer patients. Eur Urol. 2009;55:761–9. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.034. PMid:19144456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Pea-Sized Lump in Neck: Potential Causes and Treatment

The appearance of a pea-sized lump in your neck can set off alarm bells, but before you assume the worst, keep in mind that most lumps and bumps you find on your body are usually harmless and temporary.

In many cases, a small lump in the neck is a swollen lymph node that simply could be a sign you’re fighting an infection. It could be the result of an insect bite or sting, or it may possibly be a sebaceous cyst.

The location, hardness, and other characteristics of the lump should be noted, however, as they may determine whether a medical evaluation is necessary.

Even if it’s just a virus, you still may benefit from seeing a doctor for a proper diagnosis and treatment. Let’s cover conditions that can produce such a symptom.

A neck lump (also called a neck mass) has many potential causes. The following is a list of common reasons for a small, pea-sized neck lump to form.

Swollen lymph nodes

You have lymph nodes throughout your body, including split pea-sized on both sides of your neck. Lymph nodes help filter out damaged or harmful cells from lymphatic fluid, and they also help fight infections by housing immune cells that fight disease. Swollen lymph nodes in the neck can be a sign of a:

viral infection, where the swollen nodes are typically the same on both sides of the neck
bacterial infection, which usually affects nodes on one side of the neck, but may occur on both sides
tooth decay or abscess, which would affect a node area on one side, just under the jawbone
leukemia, a type of cancer
lymphoma (though usually swollen lymph nodes due to this type of cancer also tend to occur in the groin or armpits rather than just the neck)

While a lymph node in the neck is usually the size of a split pea, it can swell to be 1 inch in diameter or larger. If this occurs, you should see a doctor within 24 hours. If a lymph node swells in response to an infection, it will usually shrink within 2 to 3 weeks. If the node remains unchanged or grows over a period of a few weeks, it could be something more serious, such as leukemia.

If the lump is warm and tender to the touch, that’s probably a sign of the body fighting an infection. A lump swollen by leukemia is usually painless.

Lipoma

A lipoma is a bump formed by fatty tissue just under the skin’s surface. Lipomas are usually painless and harmless, and don’t need to be removed except for cosmetic reasons.

Epidermoid cyst

An epidermoid cyst is located just under the skin’s surface and is filled with keratin, a protein that helps make up your skin and hair. These cysts are usually painless and are unlikely to cause problems. They can become inflamed, however, and may need to be removed.

Sebaceous cyst

Just under the skin are sebaceous glands that produce an oily substance (sebum) to keep your skin moisturized and protected. A sebaceous cyst can form if the gland’s duct becomes damaged or blocked and sebum builds up inside.

Congenital neck masses

A baby born with a neck mass is likely to have one of three congenital neck masses:

dermoid cyst, which should be removed, as it can become infected and grow bigger
branchial cleft cyst, which develops from abnormal neck development while in the womb (it’s typically surgically removed to prevent infection or other complications)
thyroglossal duct cyst, formed in the womb when the duct used for distributing the thyroid gland does not fully disappear and extra cells clump together to form a cyst (surgical removal is standard)

Muscle injury

An injured neck muscle may cause general swelling or a small lump to form under the skin. With rest, these injuries usually heal on their own.

Insect bite or sting

A raised red lump on the neck that appears suddenly may be a reaction to an encounter with a mosquito or other insect. Bug bites and stings tend to have a distinct look and may itch.

Cancer

In rare cases, a small lump that forms in the neck is a cancerous solid tumor or a swollen lymph node because of leukemia or lymphoma.

As mentioned above, see a doctor if the lump grows to 1 inch in diameter or larger or does not shrink after 2 or more weeks. That could be a symptom of leukemia.

You have 200 or so lymph nodes in your neck, so a swollen node can occur almost anywhere. But in many cases, including the enlargement of certain lymph nodes, the location of the lump can help steer you and your doctor toward the right diagnosis.

Pea-sized lump on back of neck

If the lump appears somewhere on the back of the neck, possible causes include:

swollen lymph node related to a scalp infection
insect bite
sebaceous cyst
muscle injury
lipoma
epidermoid cyst

Pea-sized lump on side of neck

When the lump forms on either side of the neck, possible causes include:

swollen lymph node related to a nose, throat, or mouth infection
insect bite
sebaceous cyst
branchial cleft cyst
thyroglossal duct cyst, usually near the front and center of the neck
lipoma
epidermoid cyst

Pea-sized lump in neck above collarbone

A lump that develops above the collarbone could be:

dermoid cyst (usually found near the front of the neck)
lipoma
epidermoid cyst
lipoma
sebaceous cyst
insect bite

A softer lump that moves when you push it can be a healthy lymph node, a lipoma, or other harmless condition. A cancerous lymph node is usually hard and immovable. Some other cancerous masses may be harder as well. However, the size and location of the mass, as well as how long it has been visible, are all more important than how much or how little it moves.

In evaluating the cause of a mass forming in the neck, your doctor will examine the lump as part of a physical examination. They may check for swelling in other lymph nodes in the body, particularly the armpits and groin.

You should also be prepared to provide your medical history, any family history of diseases like cancer, and a description and timeline of your symptoms. Your doctor will likely order a complete blood count (CBC) and other specific blood work to test for markers of illness, such as:

blood glucose (sugar) level
protein levels
thyroid function testing
electrolyte levels

Lymph nodes that have remained swollen or continue to grow larger may be biopsied to determine whether the cause is a chronic infection, autoimmune condition, or cancer.

Imaging, including a neck X-ray, a computed tomography (CT) scan, or ultrasound may also be ordered.

A lump in the neck is a symptom of some health concern, usually temporary and ultimately harmless, but in rare cases is a more serious problem. Treating the underlying cause of the neck mass will typically cause the lump to recede. In some cases, though, the lump itself can be removed, as there is no other underlying cause to treat.

Viral infections

If the diagnosis is viral mononucleosis or other common viral infection, then rest and fluids are the typical treatment. For serious infections, antiviral medications may be needed.

Bacterial infection

A course of antibiotic treatment may be necessary. And depending on the nature of the infection, other treatments could be required, too. For example, a respiratory infection may mean you need an inhaler to help open the airways in the lungs.

Sebaceous cyst

A cyst may be drained of fluid, but in many cases they are surgically removed for cosmetic reasons.

Muscle injury

Rest and ice should bring down the inflammation and swelling. Once your muscle has healed, massage may help you keep the muscle more relaxed and less likely to tense and become injured.

Cancer

Whether it’s leukemia, lymphoma, or another type of cancer, treatment will depend on the severity of the disease. The stage and grade of the cancer will determine whether radiation therapy, chemotherapy, surgery, or some other treatment is the best approach.

A pea-sized lump in the neck is most likely a swollen lymph node and a sign your body is fighting an infection or an allergic reaction. If the lump, also known as a mass, retreats within a week or so and you have no other symptoms, then no medical attention is required.

If, however, the lump grows or becomes painful, or if you are experiencing symptoms like fever, difficulty swallowing, fatigue, or other signs of illness, then seek medical attention soon.

6 simple knots you might need

May 28

Survival

These versatile options are sure to come to your rescue in a variety of life situations.

Iya Zorina

Author of Lifehacker, athlete, CCM

Having mastered a few simple knots, you can fasten even very heavy objects with just one rope, and if necessary, quickly release them.

We’ll show you five ways to securely tie things in transit, make an adjustable loop to hook onto a pole, and make a very strong knot that’s perfect for towing a car on a cable.

1. Arbor knot

For its simplicity and strength, this knot is also called the bowline, or “king of knots”.

With it, you can make a non-tightening loop at the end of the rope, fix it in rings or eyelets, wrap it around a support – a tree or a pole. After removing the load, the gazebo is easy to dissolve.

1. Make a small peg – loop to further tighten the knot. Keep in mind that it is not the main loop, so you do not need to make it big.

Frame: Interparus Yachting / YouTube

2. Pass the running end through the peg, passing it from below.

Frame: Interparus Yachting / YouTube

3. Wrap the running end around the main end.

Shot: Interparus Yachting / YouTube

4. Pass the running end into the peg so that it is parallel to the end of the rope already there.

Frame: Interparus Yachting / YouTube

5. Tighten the knot well.

Frame: Interparus Yachting / YouTube

2. Triple bayonet

This knot was used in maritime affairs. With it, you can tie the mooring ends of the ship to the mooring fixtures or secure heavy loads. It is really strong and suitable for strong pulling, but is easily untied when needed.

1. Throw the rope over the support, pass the running end behind the main end, and then insert it inside the loop and tighten.

Frame: Moscow RopeAccess / YouTube

You will end up with a knot called a half bayonet.

Frame: Moscow RopeAccess / YouTube

2. Follow the same steps again: pass the running end under the root, insert inside the loops and tighten.

Frame: Moscow RopeAccess / YouTube

It is important here that the half-bayonet is exactly the same as the first one. If you pass the running end not under the root, but above it, you get a cow knot, not a bayonet.

3. Perform the steps a third time. You will get a triple bayonet, which is considered the most reliable knot.

Frame: Moscow RopeAccess / YouTube

Note that all three nodes are the same.

3. Long Midshipman’s Knot

If you want to tie something, but still be able to adjust the length of the rope later, try this knot. It allows you to easily change the size of the loop, but when it is tightened, it holds tightly.

1. Make a loop, wrap the running end around the root from above and slide it through the loop.

Frame: Trailguide Pictures / YouTube

2. Wrap the running end around the root one more time.

Frame: Trailguide Pictures / YouTube

3. Repeat the same a third time with one more turn.

Frame: Trailguide Pictures / YouTube

4. Wrap the running end around the main end above the entire winding, and then slide it inside the resulting loop and tighten.

Frame: Trailguide Pictures / YouTube

5. If you did everything right, the knot will easily walk along the rope, and under load it will tighten on its own.

Shot: Trailguide Pictures / YouTube

4. Looped Figure 8

This knot is useful for those who want to make a secure loop to attach a carabiner to. It is easy to tie, it can withstand heavy loads, and if necessary, it is quite easy to untie.

1. Fold the rope in half.

Shot: VPSK Bogatyr Novosibirsk / YouTube

2. Make a loop of double rope by placing it on your finger.