What is the effectiveness of Suprep Bowel Prep Kit? How easy is it to take? Did users experience side effects? Find out the answers to these questions and more in our in-depth review.

Suprep Bowel Prep Kit: An Overview

Suprep Bowel Prep Kit is a prescription medication used to cleanse the bowel prior to a colonoscopy or other medical procedures. It is a combination of magnesium, potassium, and sodium sulfates that work to flush out the digestive system. While it is designed to be an effective and convenient option for bowel preparation, reviews from patients have been mixed, with some reporting positive experiences and others encountering significant challenges.

Effectiveness of Suprep Bowel Prep Kit

According to the reviews, the effectiveness of Suprep Bowel Prep Kit varied among users. Some patients reported that the medication worked as intended, clearing their bowels completely and allowing their healthcare provider to perform the necessary procedure without any issues. One user stated, “My gastroenterologist said it did just exactly as it was supposed to and completed the procedure. No problems.”

However, other users found that Suprep Bowel Prep Kit was not effective for them. One reviewer shared, “It did not do what it was supposed to do for me. However, I did experience stomach pain, nausea and a headache.” Another user expressed frustration, saying, “I called my doctor and told him I still can’t stop going to the toilet, my stool is still brown not clear and he rescheduled my appointment. I just wasted a whole day of pain and torture for a poor product.”

Ease of Use

The ease of using Suprep Bowel Prep Kit was another area where opinions varied. Some users found the preparation process manageable, with one reviewer stating, “I put a soft chair in the bathroom to sit when I didn’t have to be on the toilet. I watched my favorite movie on my iPad—propped up on a portable rack that holds towels. Slept for about 4 hours. The second dose at 3 am was almost easier!”

However, other users struggled with the taste and administration of the medication. One reviewer described the taste as “disgusting” and “intolerable,” while another said, “Upon completion of first glass of water and beginning second, had a severe cramp and began vomiting.”

Side Effects

Many users reported experiencing various side effects while using Suprep Bowel Prep Kit. Common side effects included nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, chills, and flu-like symptoms. One reviewer shared, “I do have the 2nd bottle to start around 4AM but hesitant. If course Dr was closed so left message. Cost with ins was $118. For Nothing. Taste was disgusting. Side effects as noted with chills and a flu-like feeling.”

Another user expressed their frustration, saying, “It was a horrible experience for me. 40 min after second dose got very sick and threw up. Failed to clean.”

Cost Considerations

The cost of Suprep Bowel Prep Kit was another factor that users considered. While the cost with insurance varied, some users found the price to be quite high. One reviewer stated, “Suprep is $100 with insurance. The other stuff is about $1.50. They are both awful.”

Tips for Success

Despite the mixed reviews, some users shared tips that may help improve the experience with Suprep Bowel Prep Kit. One reviewer suggested, “My advice, skip the straw and drink it down in two big gulps with a swig of Gatorade in between to help with the taste.” Another user recommended, “Get it good and cold in the refrigerator. Refrigerate water used to dilute each bottle.”

Additionally, some users found that staying positive and maintaining a routine helped them get through the preparation process. One reviewer advised, “Mind over matter. Just do it. I got into a rhythm of 4 straw-fuls and then a rest. Four more and rest. I got it done. You can too. Don’t over-think it or brood on it.”

Conclusion

In summary, Suprep Bowel Prep Kit has received a range of reviews from users. While some found the medication to be effective, easy to use, and without significant side effects, others encountered significant challenges, including ineffectiveness, unpleasant taste, and various side effects. The cost of the medication was also a concern for some users.

When considering Suprep Bowel Prep Kit, it’s important to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks and discuss any concerns with your healthcare provider. Employing tips from other users, such as chilling the medication and staying positive, may also help improve the experience. Ultimately, the effectiveness and ease of use of Suprep Bowel Prep Kit appear to vary from person to person, so it’s essential to carefully evaluate your individual needs and experiences.

Suprep Bowel Prep Kit (Magnesium, Potassium, And Sodium Sulfates) Reviews

14 people have reviewed this drug

2.5

2.5 Stars

Review this Drug

Tips for Good Reviews

• Only rate drugs or treatments you’ve tried.
• In your description, mention the brand, dose, and period of time that you used the drug or treatment.
• Please share your positive and negative experiences with the drug, and compare it with other treatments you have used.
• Do not include any personal information or links in your review.

REVIEW THIS DRUG

Would you recommend this drug? (required)

How effective was this drug in treating your condition? (required)

How easy was it to take this drug? (required)

Did you experience side effects while using this drug? (required)

Share your experience with Suprep Bowel Prep Kit (Magnesium, Potassium, And Sodium Sulfates) (required)

Terms of Service (required)

I have read and agreed to the EverydayHealth. com Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Cancel

5 Stars

Posted 9 months ago (9/30/2022) 5

Report

My advice skip the straw and drink it down in two big gulps with a swig of Gatorade in between help with taste. First dose at 1:30 second 1:30 am and procedure 7:30 am. Much easier then I inticipated after all the other reviews freaked me out.

Report

5 Stars

Posted 14 months ago (4/29/2022) 5

Report

I worked myself up into a frenzy before taking the first dose. I was so afraid I would throw it up. Get it good and cold in refrig. Refrigerate water used to dilute each bottle. Placed a straw in the back of my tongue and held my nose. I was so relieved after that first dose. I put a soft chair in thr bathroom to sit when I didn’t have to be on the toilet. I watched my fav movie on my iPad—propped up on a portable rack that holds towels. Slept for about 4 hours. second dose at 3 am was almost easier! Mind over matter. Just do it. I got into a rhythm of 4 straw-fuls and then a rest. Four more and rest. I got it done. You can too. Don’t over think it or brood on it. End resul: I got everything out —even though I apparently have a long colon..all went well. Don’t have to back for 10 years

Report

1 Stars

Posted 14 months ago (4/28/2022) 1

Report

This product Suprep Bowel Prep Kit is expensive, doesn’t work, made me sick and tastes awful! I just used it per doctors instructions, followed their instructions to a T and it was horrible! First of all it tastes super nasty. I only had one hour of sleep and was up all night puking and having bad stomach pains with diarrhea. Called my doctor and told him I still can’t stop going to the toilet, my stool is still brown not clear and he rescheduled my appointment. I just wasted a whole day of pain and torture for a poor product. Common sense would dictate that someone would make it work properly and greatly improve the taste.

Report

1 Stars

Posted 16 months ago (2/1/2022) 1

Report

Started prep at 4PM. Upon completion of first glass of water and beginning second, had a severe cramp and began vomiting. A little must’ve gotten in my system as I did have some results. I do have the 2nd bottle to start around 4AM but hesitant. If course Dr was closed so left message. Cost with ins was $118. For Nothing. Taste was disgusting. Side effects as noted with chills and a flu-like feeling. Thought the MiraLax prep was bad but this is torture.

Report

1 Stars

Posted 26 months ago (4/21/2021) 1

Report

Dr. Should never prescribe this. Ive never been sicker. Taste is intolerable.

Report

1 Stars

Posted 26 months ago (4/13/2021) 1

Report

It was a horrible experience for me. 40 min after second dose got very sick and threw up. Failed to clean.

Report

1 Stars

Posted 27 months ago (3/16/2021) 1

Report

Superpower was very expensive $115.00 at Costco with insurance. It did not do what it was suppose to do for me. However, I did experience stomach pain, nausea and a headache. Very unpleasant taste. I also added a couple of drops of Crystal Light (liquid concentrate). I’ll call my Dr when they open because I’m unsure if he can do the procedure since nothing happened.

Report

1 Stars

Posted 28 months ago (2/12/2021) 1

Report

Awful, I took first dose at 5 pm , it’s 10 pm now and haven’t stopped going to the bathroom. I have to take second dose at 5 am, I guess I won’t sleep much. If I knew I was going to be in the bathroom for over five hours I would have taken it earlier. I’m going to cheat and only drink a quarter bottle in the morning.

Report

5 Stars

Posted 28 months ago (1/30/2021) 5

Report

I was on a low fiber low residue diet for 5 days before taking two doses of this. I gulped it down. It sent me to the bathroom for approximately 1 hour after dosing. My gastroenterologist said it did just exactly as it was supposed to and completed the procedure. No problems

Report

3 Stars

Posted 31 months ago (11/20/2020) 3

Report

Suprep is $100 with insurance. The other stuff is about $1.50. They are both awful. I could not keep it down on the second dose. I had read tons of reviews talking about back pain, the chills and nausea and vomiting and I had all of it. If both prep brands are terrible, maybe chose the one that isn’t $100? Expert tip: lemon wedges to suck on between every three or four sips.

Report

3 Stars

Posted 33 months ago (9/19/2020) 3

Report

All I can say is 95. 00 with insurance for a day of hell. Yes its very effective but very unpleasant experience. Tastes awful and its effects are explosive. Add some crystal light to it powder form and its more manageable. Started prep at 4pm and was still going to the bathroom violently until 11pm. The experience was not pleasant.

Report

4 Stars

Posted 34 months ago (8/29/2020) 4

Report

I had my first colonoscopy this week, I’m 37. Family history of colorectal cancer. I was terrified to do the prep because of all of the nasty reviews I read online. I am happy to say I did not experience the side effects such as vomiting, abdominal pains, headache, cold sweats. I did have nausea after drinking the second bottle, I attribute that to the early morning dose. The solution taste terrible, but I chased it with Ginger ale, apple juice, water, and sucked on a lemon lozenge in between each gulp. It worked within 30 minutes of me drinking, and I had BM for the following 2 hrs, with occasional BM hrs after. I took the first bottle 2 1/2 hours before recommended time, each time. Glad I did. It gave me more time to drink water and allow it to work its way. Plus I slept through the night before the following dose. Obviously it would be nicer if there was a different way to approach this preparation but it’s doable.

Report

1 Stars

Posted 34 months ago (8/22/2020) 1

Report

I took the first half as directed and it seemed to be working as intended. Very uncomfortable bloating and distention of abdomen. In the middle of the night I developed a headache, I tried to sleep it off but by morning it was the same. I had cold sweat and my temperature was 95° F. I began vomiting for several hours from 6:30am until 10:45 at which time I had been unable to get to the hospital by the 10am check in time. I had to cancel the colonoscopy and did so by about 8am as I didn’t think I’d be able to take the half hour drive and I was right, I wouldn’t have made it. So I have to go through it all again next month but I won’t be using Suprep Bowl Prep that much I know for sure.

Report

1 Stars

Posted 34 months ago (8/4/2020) 1

Report

Suprep is tested on dogs. Not acceptable. It completely wiped out all my friendly bacteria and I am suffering now with gas pains.

Report

What Are the Worst (And Best) Colonoscopy Preps? Don’t Pooh-Pooh This Article

Last week, it was colonoscopy time again. Oh, joy! But it gave me an excuse to look up alternate bowel preps – and it’s a damn good thing I did. Which prep is the one to have? Which is best to avoid? It’s not so easy to tell. As a bonus, here are some hilarious quotes.

If you’re lucky enough to have died at age 49, there is no need to read this. But if you reach 50, welcome to the beginning of old age, where icky things start to happen to you. One icky but hugely important thing will be a birthday gift called a colonoscopy, which people fear mightily. They shouldn’t. Although the image of a bassoon being force-fed into your anus isn’t especially comforting, a colonoscopy is nothing more than a really good nap, thanks to the wonder drug propofol, something I wrote about in 2020. 

The real problem is a second gift that necessarily precedes the first – the dreaded colonoscopy prep, and it doesn’t even come with a card. If you don’t like it (you won’t), don’t worry. You can always return it. Check that.  You will return it, forcefully, but this transaction should not take place at the pharmacy.

Not all colonoscopy preps are equal. They range from “not that hideous” to “violation of the Geneva Convention hideous.” The “good” news is that you do have some choices, which is made clear in a 2019 prospective study published in the Journal of Gastroenterology, which looked at the most commonly used bowel preparations (emphasis mine):

GoLYTELY significantly underperformed in terms of prep tolerability compared with magnesium citrate, MiraLAX with Gatorade, MoviPrep, OsmoPrep, Prepopik/Clenpiq, and SUPREP.  

Philip Gu, M.D., at. al.,  Am. J. Gastroenterol 2019 Feb 01;114(2)305-314, 

Do these findings match what patients have to report on askapatient.com – the website I go to before I try a new medicine? The patient ratings and rants are descriptive and subjective, not scientific. Nonetheless, if you look up a drug and its rating is below 2.5 or 3.0 out of 5, and there are some real doozies in the comments section, it’s a pretty good bet that it’s going to be all kinds of nasty. (See “4 Prescription Drugs People Hate” if you don’t believe me.) 

I’m going to use patient ratings as a (very) rough indicator of what our choices are now and whether they are any better or worse than GoLYTELY, the gold standard of putridity – Four gallons of a vile salty-cherry tasting abomination that most of us (especially in the “almost time for a dirt nap crowd,”) have either experienced or heard someone else complain bitterly about. Are the preps in the study, which are allegedly superior to GoLYTELY, really any better, at least when it comes to self-reporting of a few dozen to a few hundred people? 

GoLYTELY – ASK A PATIENT AVG. RATING 2.9/5

GoLYTELY consists of polyethylene glycol 3350 aka PEG 3350 (no flavor), as well as sodium sulfate (salty flavor), sodium bicarbonate (salty flavor), potassium chloride (really nasty salty flavor), and sodium chloride (salt). Can it be the least bit surprising that victims patients who have taken the stuff have complained about the salty flavor?? 

If you’re looking for amusing and creative quotes about the side effects of just about any drug website askapatient.com wins hands down. It did not disappoint…

“I thought it tasted like a lobster’s urine would, with the same thickness/filminess.” 

The salty flavor is only one problem with this vile potion. The volume that must be consumed – more than one gallon – is even worse. Here are the instructions on the label (emphasis mine):

“Fill the supplied container containing the GoLYTELY powder with lukewarm drinking water to the 4-liter fill line • Do not add any other ingredients, flavors, etc. • After capping the container, shake vigorously several times to ensure that the ingredients are dissolved. • Drink at a rate of 8 ounces every 10 minutes until the entire contents are consumed or the rectal effluent is clear. A loose watery bowel movement should result in approximately one hour.”

Can you drink 8 ounces of saltwater every 10 minutes?? It actually sounds worse once we do the math. Since 4 liters = 135 ounces, at the rate of 8 ounces every 10 minutes, something that might be a challenge for a beluga whale, you would have to keep this up for 169 minutes (2 hours and 48 minutes), during which time you will have consumed 17 glasses of the stuff. 

Not surprisingly, some people had a bit of trouble (1). Including this unfortunate individual who didn’t even make it past the starting line:

“After the first swallow, it came back up just like that scene in The Exorcist. “

I stumbled upon some other amusing opinions… 

“Can I just suck on a piece of burnt rubber between 2 slices of toast? I’m sure that would taste better.“

“Vile-tasting swill, chemically-induced cholera.”

But for the people who could get it down, it works rather well…

“Let’s just say my car’s driver seat is in bad shape at the moment.”

And even better, some elegant prose for your entertainment:

“Trying to clench my butt cheeks tightly together to avoid the fecal river that I knew was waiting to meander out of my anus.” (My personal favorite)

The study concludes: “The bowel preps with the best bowel cleansing and tolerability were MiraLAX with Gatorade, MoviPrep, and SUPREP under real-world conditions.” I was a bit surprised to find that patient comments and ratings – admittedly unscientific – don’t agree with the study

SUPREP Bowel Prep Kit – Ask A Patient Avg. Rating 2.1/5

SUPREP contains a bunch of salts, some the same as in GoLYTELY and some different. It’s still plenty salty. Is this a better recipe? I don’t know, but the total volume the one must consume (3 liters) isn’t that different than GoLYTELY (4 liters). And the patient ratings and comments might even be worse. For example…

“I’d rather someone inflate me with a fire-hose than drink this trash.”

For those of you who have a life who are not familiar with Ask a Patient, it is very difficult to come up with a score that low. Even though I did a pretty thorough search while writing the “4 Drugs” article, I only came across one drug with a rating lower than 2.1, and it was significantly lower. Anyone want to guess?

MoviPrep – Ask A Patient AVG. Rating 2.6/5

MoviPrep is a similar concoction that contains polyethylene glycol and six different salts. The taste isn’t any better, but at least you don’t have to drink as much.

“Vile tasting. I gagged on the first sip. I will never use this product again.”

But also…

“It is easier than Go Lightly [sic] because it’s less volume–but still is disgusting!!”

Miralax – Ask A Patient Avg. Rating 3.4/5

Miralax contains only one ingredient – polyethylene glycol, aka PEG 3350 – a white powder that dissolves in water and gives something that is virtually indistinguishable from a glass of water. As a colonoscopy prep, it is dissolved in Gatorade. You damn well better like Gatorade because you’ll be drinking two 32-ounce bottles of it. That’s a bitchload of Gatorade, and after that, you’re supposed to drink 16 ounces of water. Even with these volumes, it still adds up to a slightly lower volume than Go Lightly. Because there are no salts (2) other than those present in the Gatorade, it tastes exactly like the Gatorade. Of the four preps in this article, Miralax got the highest rating, 3.4/5.

But this rating doesn’t mean much because most (~90%) of the reviewers took Miralax for other conditions, for example, constipation or IBS. The poor ratings were generally due to cramping and diarrhea, not the taste. Some people reported severe vomiting. 

My Own Experience

Miralax worked very well. Mixed with Gatorade, I was able to drink all 64 ounces with little trouble.  I then hydrated the rest of the day. No significant issues (3,4). More or less. Miralax is used with Dulcolax (maybe the smallest pills I’ve ever seen), but also a 10-ounce bottle of magnesium citrate (not rated). The first sip: “Hey, this stuff ain’t bad. It tastes like lemon soda!” By ounce #5: “Maybe not.” By ounce #9: “Make that Lemon Pledge with rock salt in it.” OK, it wasn’t wonderful, but most people shouldn’t have much trouble, especially if you add ice. 

Bottom (heh heh) Line

It pays to do your homework. When my gastroenterologist suggested MoviPrep I pulled out a chainsaw politely declined since I wanted to go the Miralax/Gatorade route. He had no problem with it. The prep worked out just fine, and the next day when the magnificent propofol hit my blood, all I remember is waking up with an uncontrollable urge for Dunkin Donuts. 

It should be obvious that different people will have their own “favorites,” and while the patient ratings don’t agree with the clinical study, keep in mind that the study was scientific and the comments and ratings are not.

What’s really important is that there are more choices now, which should help with prep day. Colonoscopy is very effective in detecting and removing intestinal polyps, which can become cancerous. Almost 50,000 people will die from colorectal cancer in a given year. Why be one of them?

NOTES:

(1) Others had no problem with GoLYTLEY and gave it good ratings. The numbers were all over the place.

(2) This makes a big difference. The complaint I saw time after time with all the formulas (except Miralax) was the salty taste. 

(3) I’ll leave out hitting my head on the bathroom ceiling. 

(4) Use a straw to drink the stuff. It helps.

Systematic review of bowel preparation for imaging | Morozov

1. Informativeness of methods of radiation diagnostics in various pathological conditions of the body. Section 2. Diagnosis of pathological conditions and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract / Ed. S.P. Morozov. Series “Best practices of radiological and instrumental diagnostics”. Issue. 19. M., 2018. 20 p.

2. Khomutova E.Yu., Ignatiev Yu.T., Filippova Yu.G. Possibilities of the cleaning option during virtual colonoscopy. medical imaging. 2010; 2:129-36.

3. Rogozina N.N., Morozov S.P., Bashankaev B.N. Virtual colonoscopy. Oncology. Journal them. P.A. Herzen. 2014; 2(6): 77-84.

4. Rogozina N.N., Morozov S.P., Kryuchkova O.V., Nishitov S.P. Errors in performing and evaluating the results of computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Bulletin of radiology and radiology. 2014; 1:63-9.

5. Rogozina N.N., Neshitov S.P., Morozov S.P. Possibilities of computed tomographic colonography in the detection of neoplasms of the large intestine. Surgery. Journal them. N.I. Pirogov. 2014; 3:37-42.

6. Trofimova T.N., Pirgulov S.N. Irrigoscopy, CT-colonography, MRI of the rectum: diagnostics in coloproctology at the present stage of development. Radiation diagnostics and therapy. 2016; 4(7): 20-8.

7. Lin J.S., Piper M.A., Perdue L.A., Rutter C.M. et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016 Jun 21; 315(23): 2576-94. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.3332

8. Chang K.J., Kim D.H. CTC technique: methods to ensure an optimal exam. Abdom Radiol (NY). March 2018; 43(3): 523-38. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1499th

9. Woodbridge L., Wylie P. Current Issues in Computed Tomography Colonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2016 Aug; 37(4): 331-8. DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2016.02.005

10. Neri E., Lefere P., Gryspeerdt S., Bemi P. et al. Bowel preparation for CT colonography. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Aug; 82(8): 1137-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.006

11. Neri E., Halligan S., Hellstrom M., Lefere P., Mang T., Regge D. et al. The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol. March 2013; 23(3): 720-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2632-x

12. ACR-SAR-SCBT-MR practice parameter for the performance of computed tomography (CT) colonography in adults. URL: https://www.acr.org/w/media/ACR/Doc-uments/PGTS/guidelines/CT_Colonography.pdf (accessed 11/25/2018).

13. Moreno C., Kim D.H., Bartel T.B., Cash B.D., Chang K.J. et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Colorectal Cancer Screening. J Am Call Radiol. May 2018; 15(5S): S56-S68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.014

14. Plumb A.A., Pathiraja F., Nickerson C., Wooldrage K. et al. Appearances of screen-detected versus symptomatic colorectal cancers at CT colonography. Eur Radiol. Dec 2016; 26(12): 4313-22.

15. Meric K., Bakal N., §enatej E., Aydin S. et al. Comparison of a 4-Day versus 2-Day Low Fiber Diet Regimen in Barium Tagging CT Colonography in Incomplete Colonoscopy Patients. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015; 2015:609150. DOI: 10.1155/2015/609150

16. Bellini D., De Santis D., Caruso D., Rengo M., Ferrari R., Biondi T. et al. Bowel preparation in CT colonography: Is diet restriction necessary? A randomized trial (DIET-SAN). Eur Radiol. Jan 2018; 28(1): 382-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4997-3

17. Meshcheryakov A.I., Gurova N.Yu., Burkov S.G., Pugacheva O.G., Balashov A.V., Zolina A.S. Comparative effectiveness of computer colonography (virtual colonoscopy) in the diagnosis of colon neoplasms with and without the use of residual intestinal contents labeling. Annals of Surgery. 2018; 23(1): 33-41.

18. Leisle A.K., Zavadovskaya V.D., Ushakov A.V., Moshneguts S.V. Optimization of labeling of residual intestinal contents in preparing patients for virtual colonoscopy. Radiation diagnostics and therapy. 2016; 4(7):57-65.

19. Kim B., Park S.H., Hong G.S., Lee J.H., Lee J.S., Kim H.J. et al. lohexol versus diatrizoate for fecal/fluid tagging during CT colonography performed with cathartic preparation: comparison of examination quality. Eur Radiol. Jun 2015; 25(6): 1561-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3568-0

20. E.Yu. Khomutova, Yu.T. Possibilities of virtual colonoscopy in the screening of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps. medical imaging. 2009; 1:6775.

21. Zalis M.E., Hahn P.F. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 176:646-8.

22. Kealey S.M., Dodd J.D., MacEneaney P.M., Gibney R.G., Malone D.E. Minimal preparation computed tomography instead of barium enema/colonoscopy for suspected colon cancer in frail elderly patients: an outcome analysis study. Clinic Radiol. 2004 Jan; 59(1): 44-52.

23. Romdhane H., Marzouk I., Mzoughi Z., Cheikh M. et al. Value of water enema computed tomography in elderly symptomatic patients. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec;18(4): 235-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajg.2017.11.006

24. Fletcher J.G., Silva A.C., Fidler J.L., Cernigliaro J.G., Manduca A. et al. Noncathartic CT colonography: Image quality assessment and performance and in a screening cohort. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Oct; 201(4): 787-94. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9225

Intern Med J. 2018 Jun 11. DOI: 10.1111/imj.13999

26. Zalis M.E., Blake M.A., Cai W., Hahn P.F., Halpern E.F. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography for detection of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults: a prospective evaluation. Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15; 156(10): 692-702. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00005

27. Ginnerup Pedersen B., Möller Christiansen T.E., Vi-borg Mortensen F., Christensen H., Laurberg S. Bowel cleansing methods prior to CT colonography. Acta Radiol. 2002 May; 43(3): 306-11.

28. Forbes G.M., Edwards J.T., Foster N.M., Wood C.J., Mendelson R.M. Randomized single blind trial of two low-volume bowel preparations for screening computed tomographic colonography. Abdomimaging. 2005 Jan-Feb; 30(1): 48-52.

29. Dachman A.H., Dawson D.O., Lefere P., Yoshida H., Khan N.U., Cipriani N., Rubin D.T. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Abdomimaging. 2007 Jan-Feb; 32(1): 96-104.

30. Kim D.H., Pickhardt P.J., Hinshaw J.L., Taylor A.J., Mukherjee R., Pfau P.R. Prospective blinded trial comparing 45-mL and 90-mL doses of oral sodium phosphate for bowel preparation before computed tomographic colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 Jan-Feb; 31(1): 53-8.

31. Yoon S.H., Kim S.H., Kim S.G., Kim S.J. et al. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients’ compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: a preliminary study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009Sep-Oct; 33(5): 657-65. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181926570

32. Nagata K., Okawa T., Honma A., Endo S. , Kudo S.E., Yoshida H. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance. Acad Radiol. 2009 Jun; 16(7): 780-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.12.027

33. Campanella D., Morra L., Delsanto S. et al. Comparison of three different iodine-based bowel regimens for CT colonography. Eur Radiol. February 2010; 20(2): 348-58. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1553-9

34. Hara A.K., Kuo M.D., Blevins M., Chen M.H. et al. National CT colonography trial (ACRIN 6664): comparison of three full-laxative bowel preparations in more than 2500 average-risk patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. May 2011; 196(5): 1076-82. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4334

35. Faccioli N., Foti G., Barillari M., Zaccarella A., Camera L. et al. A simplified approach to virtual colonoscopy using different intestinal preparations: preliminary experience with regard to quality, accuracy and patient acceptability. Radiol Med. 2011 Aug; 116(5): 749-58. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0661-1

36. Keedy A.W., Yee J., Aslam R., Weinstein S., Landeras L.A. et al. Reduced cathartic bowel preparation for CT colonography: prospective comparison of 2-L polyethylene glycol and magnesium citrate. radiology. 2011 Oct; 261(1): 156-64. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110217

37. Chen Z.Y., Shen H.S., Luo M.Y., Duan C.J. et al. Pilot study on efficacy of reduced cathartic bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 28; 19(4): 561-8. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.561

38. Sali L., Mascalchi M., Falchini M., Ventura L. et al. Reduced and Full-Preparation CT Colonography, Fecal Immunochemical Test, and Colonoscopy for Population Screening of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Dec 30; 108(2). PII: djv319. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv319

39. Bannas P., Bakke J., Patrick J.L., Pickhardt P.J. Automated volumetric analysis for comparison of oral sulfate solution (SUPREP) with established cathartic agents at CT colonography. Abdomimaging. Jan 2015; 40(1): 11-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0186-x

40. lafrate F., lannitti M., CioLina M., Baldassari P., Pichi A., Laghi A. Bowel cleansing before CT colonography: comparison between two minimal-preparation regimens. Eur Radiol. Jan 2015; 25(1): 203-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3345-0

41. Nagata K., Endo S., Honda T., Yasuda T., Hirayama M., Takahashi S. et al. Accuracy of CT Colonography for Detection of Polypoid and Nonpolypoid Neoplasia by Gastroenterologists and Radiologists: A Nationwide Multicenter Study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol. Jan 2017; 112(1): 163-71. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.478

42. Sali L., Ventura L., Grazzini G., Borgheresi A. et al. Patients’ experience of screening CT colonography with reduced and full bowel preparation in a randomized trial. Eur Radiol. 2018 Nov 6. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5808-1

43. Taylor S.A., Avni F., Cronin C.G., Hoeffel C. et al. The first joint ESGAR/ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging. Eur Radiol. Jun 2017; 27(6): 257082. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4615-9

44. Khomutova E.Yu., Ignatiev Yu.T., Skripkin D.A., Filippova Yu.G. Virtual colonoscopy: methodology. Radiology – practice. 2009; 2:21-7.

45. Khomutova E.Yu., Ignatiev Yu.T., Filippova Yu.G., Skripkin D.A. Automatic detection of neoplasms during virtual colonoscopy. medical imaging. 2010; 1:111-6.

46. Khomutova E.Yu. Virtual colonoscopy in the work of a general practitioner. Bulletin of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2011; 31(6): 74-80.

47. Shelygin Yu.A., Zarodnyuk I.V., Tikhonov A.A., Veselov V.V., Markova E.V. Virtual colonoscopy for colorectal cancer and colon adenomatosis. medical imaging. 2011; 5:41-7.

48. Morozov S.P., Nasnikova I.Yu., Zvezdkina E.A., Pospelov I.V. Modern recommendations for performing computer colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Radiation diagnostics and therapy. 2011; 2(2): 92-6.

49. Tarasenko T.D., Zubarev A. R. Possibilities of multislice computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) in the diagnosis of colon neoplasms. Bulletin of the Russian State Medical University. 2009; 1:52-6.

50. Yaitsky N.A., Amosov V.I., Speranskaya A.A., Sednev A.V., Orlov V.N., Vasilieva M.A. Possibilities of multislice computed tomography in the diagnosis of pathological changes in the large intestine. Bulletin of Surgery. I.I. Grekov. 2007; 166(5): 48-56.

51. Primak N.V., Grishkov S.M., Tsallagova Z.S., Kotlyarov P.M., Solodkiy V.A. MSCT colonography in the diagnosis of colon cancer and polyps. Bulletin of the Russian Scientific Center for Roentgen Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russia. 2012; 12(4): 5.

52. Zarodnyuk I.V., Tikhonov A.A., Kuzminov A.M., Veselov V.V., Markova E.V. Experience in the use of virtual colonoscopy in familial colon adenomatosis. Coloproctology. 2014; 2(48): 15-9.

53. Khomutova E.Yu., Ignatiev Yu.T. Multispiral computerized virtual colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colon pathology (literature review). medical imaging. 2008; 6:73-82.

54. Dubrova S.E., Stashuk G.A. Possibilities of radiological methods in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2016; 44(6): 757-69. [Dubrova S.E., Stashuk G.A. The potential of radiologic procedures in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Al’manah klinicheskoj mediciny (Almanac of Clinical Medicine). 2016; 44(6): 757-69 (In Russ.)].

55. Rubtsova N.A., Puzakov K.B. The role of MRI in the diagnosis, planning and evaluation of the effectiveness of the treatment of rectal cancer. Russian journal of oncology. 2012; 3:42-50.

56. Van der Paardt M.P., Stoker J. Magnetic resonance colonography for screening and diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. February 2014; 22(1): 67-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2013.07.006

57. Luboldt W., Steiner P., Bauerfeind P. et al. Detection with mass lesions colonography: preliminary report. radiology. 1998; 207:59-65.

58. Pappalardo G. , Polettini E., Frattaroli F.M. et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. gastroenterology. 2000; 119(2): 300-4.

59. Lauenstein T.C., Herborn C.U., Vogt F.M. et al. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience. Rofo. 2001; 173(9): 785-9.

60. Lauenstein T., Holtmann G., Schoenfelder D. et al. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 177:823-7.

61. Morrin M.M., Hochman M.G., Farrell R.J. et al. MR colonography using colonic distention with air as the contrast material: work in progress. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 176(1): 144-6.

62. Lomas D.J., Sood R.R., Graves M.J. et al. Colon carcinoma: MR imaging with CO2 enema – pilot study. radiology. 2001; 219(2): 558-62.

63. Lauenstein T.C., Debatin J.F. Magnetic resonance colonography with fecal tagging: an innovative approach without bowel cleansing. Top Magn Resonance Imaging. Dec 2002; 13(6): 435-44.

64. Ajaj W. Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. gut. 2003; 52(12): 1738-43.

65. Ajaj W., Lauenstein T.C., Pelster G. et al. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 19(2): 216-21.

66. Lam W.W., Leung W.K., Wu J.K.L. et al. Screening of colonic tumors by air-inflated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 19(4): 447-52.

67. Leung W.K., Lam W.W., Wu J.C. et al. Magnetic resonance colonography in the detection of colonic neoplasm in high-risk and average-risk individuals. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99(1): 102-8.

68. Ajaj W., Lauenstein T.C., Pelster G. et al. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. radiology. 2005; 234(9): 452-9.

69. Goehde S.C., Descher E., Boekstegers A. et al. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance. Abdomimaging. 2005; 30(5): 576-83.

70. Hartmann D., Bassler B., Schilling D. et al. Incomplete conventional colonoscopy: magnetic resonance colonography in the evaluation of the proximal colon. endoscopy. 2005; 37(9): 816-20.

71. Hartmann D., Bassler B., Schilling D. et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark lumen MRC versus conventional colonoscopy. radiology. 2006; 238(1): 143-9.

72. Florie J., van Gelder R.E., Haberkorn B., Birnie E., Lavini C., Reitsma J.B., Stoker J. Magnetic resonance colonography with limited bowel preparation: a comparison of three strategies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Apr; 25(4): 766-74.

73. Kuehle C.A., Langhorst J., Ladd S.C. et al. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population. gut. 2007; 56(8): 1079-85.

74. Saar B., Meining A., Beer A. et al. Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy. Br J Rheumatol. 2007; 80(952): 235-41.

75. Saar B., Gschossmann J.M., Bonel H.M. et al. Evaluation of magnetic resonance colonography at 3.0 Tesla regarding diagnostic accuracy and image quality. Invest Radiol. 2008; 43(8): 580-6.

76. Rodriguez Gomez S., Page’s Llinas M., Castells Garangou A. et al. Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(7): 1396-405.

77. Achiam M.P., Logager V.B., Chabanova E. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography with fecal tagging. Abdomimaging. 2009; 34(4): 483-90.

78. Achiam M.P., Holst Anderson L.P., Klein M. et al. Preoperative evaluation of synchronous colorectal cancer using MR colonography. Acad Radiol. 2009; 16(7): 790-7.

79. Bakir B., Acunas B., Bugra D. et al. MR colonography after oral administration of polyethylene glycolelectro-lyte solution. radiology. 2009; 251(3): 901-9.

80. Keeling A.N., Morrin M.M., McKenzie C. et al. Intravenous, contrast-enhanced MR colonography using air as endoluminal contrast agent: impact on colorectal polyp detection. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 81:31-8.

81. Sambrook A., Mcateer D., Yule S. et al. MR colonography without bowel cleansing or water enema: a pilot study. Br J Radiol. 2012; 85(1015): 921-4.

82. Graser A., ​​Melzer A., ​​Lindner E., Nagel D., Herrmann K., Stieber P., Schirra J., Mansmann U., Reiser M.F., Goke B., Kolligs F.T. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. gastroenterology. 2013 Apr; 144(4): 743-50.e2. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.12.041

83. Acay M.B., Bayramoglu S., Acay A. The sensitivity of MR colonography using dark lumen technique for detection of colonic lesions. Turk J Gastroenterol. Jun 2014; 25(3): 271-8. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2014.4850

84. Van der Paardt M.P., Boellaard T.N., Zijta F.M. et al. Magnetic resonance colonography with a limited bowel preparation and automated carbon dioxide insufflation in comparison to conventional colon: patient burden and preferences. Eur J Radiol. Jan 2015; 84(1): 19-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.10.006

85. Achiam M.P., L0gager V., Lund Rasmussen V., Okholm C., MoUerup T., Thomsen H.S., Rosenberg J. Perioperative Colonic Evaluation in Patients with Rectal Cancer; MR Colonography Versus Standard Care. Acad Radiol. Dec 2015; 22(12):1 522-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.08.019

86. Boraschi P., Donati F. MR colonography with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema for the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease. Jpn J Radiol. 2016 Aug; 34(8): 585-94. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-016-0552-4

87. Oussalah A., Laurent V., Bruot O., Bressenot A., Bigard M.A., Regent D., Peyrin-Biroulet L. preparation for detecting colonic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. gut. 2010 Aug; 59(8): 105665. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2009.197665

88. Zijta F.M., Nederveen A.J., Jensch S. et al. Feasibility of using automated insufflated carbon dioxide (CO(2)) for luminal distension in 3.0T MR colonography. Eur J Radiol. 2013; 81(6): 1128-33.

89. Bazot M., Bharwani N., Huchon C., Kinkel K. et al. European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol. 2017 Jun; 27(7): 2765-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z

90. Kinkel K., Forstner R., Danza F.M., Oleaga L. et al. Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Imaging. Eur Radiol. 2009Jul; 19(7): 1565-74. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1309-6

91. Nougaret S., Horta M., Sala E., Lakhman Y., Thomassin-Naggara I. et al. Endometrial Cancer MRI staging: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul 11. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5515-y

92. Kubik-Huch R.A., Weston M., Nougaret S., Leonhardt H., Thomassin-Naggara I. et al. European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Guidelines: MR Imaging of Leiomyomas. Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug; 28(8): 3125-37. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5157-5

93. Forstner R., Sala E. , Kinkel K., Spencer J.A. ESUR guidelines: ovarian cancer staging and follow-up. Eur Radiol. Dec 2010; 20(12): 2773-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1886-4

94. Limberg B. Diagnosis and staging of colonic tumors by conventional abdominal sonography as compared with hydrocolonic sonography. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 9; 327(2): 65-9.

95. Siripongsakun S., Charoenvisal L., Pantongrag-Brown L. et al. Hydrocolonic sonography: a complete colorectal evaluation technique with preliminary results. J Clin Ultrasound. 2013 Sep; 41(7): 402-7. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22060

96. Fan X.P., Zhu O., Zhou Y.J., Ma T., Xia C.X., Huang H.L. Comparative Study of Three Regimens of Bowel Preparation Before Transabdominal Ultrasonography of the Colon. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Sep; 42(9): 2140-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.04.005

97. Liu J.Y., Chen L.D., Cai H.S., Liang J.Y. et al. Ultrasound virtual endoscopy: Polyp detection and reliability of measurement in an in vitro study with pig intestine specimens. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 28; 22(12): 3355-62. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3355

98. Liu J.Y., Chen L.D., Xu J.B., Wu H. et al. Transabdominal Ultrasound Colonography for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasms: Initial Clinical Experience. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Oct; 43(10): 2174-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras-medbio.2017.05.020

99. Kuzmich S., Harvey C.J., Kuzmich T., Tan K.L. Ultrasound detection of colonic polyps: perspective. Br J Radiol. Nov 2012; 85(1019): e1155-64. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/60593124

100. D. N. Emelyanov, R. G. Myazin, A. V. Gushul, I. Yu. Statsenko, and O. Yu. Pharmacological means of preparing the large intestine for research. Medicinal Bulletin. 2017; 11(2): 33-9.

101. Mundinger A., ​​Dengel H., Leibersperger H. A comparative study of methods of preparing the colon for a double-contrast study: Prepacol versus ricinus capsules with a cleansing enema. radiology. 1990 Jan; 30(1): 34-8.

102. Strates B.S., Hofmann L.M. A randomized study of two preparations for large bowel radiology. Pharmathera-peutica. 1987; 5(1): 57-61.

103. Jensen P.R., Hasselbalch H., Martens S. Cleansing of the colon for roentgen studies. Ugeskr Laeger. 1987 Oct 26; 149(44): 2979-80.

104. Buhl J., Jacobsen L. Evacuation of colon before X-ray investigation. Bisacodyl tablets and enema fluid (Dulco-lax tube set) versus castor oil and Klyx enema. Ugeskr Laeger. 1980 Mar 31; 142(14): 877-8.

105. O’Donovan A.N., Somers S., Farrow R., Mernagh J., Rawlinson J., Stevenson G.W. A prospective blinded randomized trial comparing oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol solutions for bowel preparation prior to barium enema. Clinic Radiol. 1997 Oct; 52(10): 791-3.

106. Apisarnthanarak P., Rotjanaaree B., Komoltri C. et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of castor oil and sodium phosphate preparation for barium enema. J Med Associate Thai. February 2009; 92(2): 243-9.

107. Bartram C.I. Bowel preparation – principles and practice. Clinic Radiol. 1994 Jun; 49(6): 365-7.

108. Toledo T.K., DiPalma J.A. Review article: colon cleansing preparation for gastrointestinal procedures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001 May; 15(5): 605-11.

109. Korolyuk I.P., Lindenbraten L.D. Radiation diagnostics: textbook. M.: Publishing house BINOM. 2013; 496. [Korolyuk I.P., Lindenbraten L.D. Radiology: Handbook. M.: Izd-vo BINOM. 2013; 496 (In Russ.)].

110. Chakraverty S., Hughes T., Keir M.J., Hall J.R., Rawlinson J. Preparation of the colon for double-contrast barium enema: comparison of Picolax, Picolax with cleansing enema and Citramag (2 sachets) – a randomized prospective trial. Clinic Radiol. 1994 Aug; 49(8): 566-9.

111. Lai A.K., Kwok P.C., Man S.W., Lau R.S., Chan S.C. A blinded clinical trial comparing conventional cleansing enema, Pico-salax and Golytely for barium enema bowel preparation. Clinic Radiol. 1996 Aug; 51(8): 566-9.

112. Bradley A.J., Taylor P.M. Does bowel preparation improve the quality of intravenous urography? Br J Radiol. 1996 Oct; 69(826): 906-9.

113. Dadkhah F., Safarinejad M.R., Amini E., Soleimani M., Lashay A.R. Is bowel preparation necessary before kidney-ureter-bladder radiography and intravenous urography? Urol J. 2012 Summer; 9(3): 600-5.

114. George C.D., Vinnicombe S.J., Balkissoon A.R., Heron C.W. Bowel preparation before intravenous urography: is it necessary? Br J Radiol. 1993 Jan; 66(781): 17-9.

115. Guo H., Huang Y., Xi Z., Song Y., Guo Y., Na Y. Is bowel preparation before excretory urography necessary? A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. February 2006; 175(2): 665-8; discussion 669.

116. Jansson M., Geijer H., Andersson T. Bowel preparation for excretory urography is not necessary: ​​a randomized trial. Br J Radiol. 2007 Aug; 80(956): 617-24.

117. Subramonian K., McNaught J., Spencer N., Harrison S.C. Is bowel preparation useful before radiography of the renal tract in patients with spinal cord injury? BJU Int. February 2000; 85(3): 224-6.

118. Thorstensen O., Davidsdottir S., Sigurjonsson K., Arnadottir E., Hallgrimsson P. Double blinded prospective study of usefulness of bowel preparation on outpatients before intravenous urography. Laeknabladid. Nov 1998; 84(11): 829-32.

119. Yang H.C., Sheu M.H., Wang J.H., Chang C.Y. Bowel preparation of outpatients for intravenous urography: efficacy of castor oil versus bisacodyl. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2005 Apr; 21(4): 153-8.

120. Chalazonitis A., Tzovara I., Laspas F., Porfyridis P. et al. Hysterosalpingography: technique and applications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2009Sep-Oct; 38(5): 199-205. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2008.02.003

121. Simpson W.L.Jr., Beitia L.G., Mester J. Hysterosalpingo-graphy: a reemerging study. radiographics. 2006 Mar-Apr; 26(2): 419-31.

122. Takayanagi D., Utano K., Isohata N., Aizawa M. et al. Super-Reduced-Laxative Volume for CT Colonography Using MoviprepTM: A Randomized Controlled Trial. gastroenterology. 2017; 152(5): S81. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(17)30618-2

Preparation for bowel examinations (colonoscopy, videorectoscopy and polypectomy)

Preparation consists of a diet and a special preparation. A two-stage bowel preparation is preferred. To select a cleaning schedule, click on the time of the procedure:

One-stage evening regimen (only carried out if the two-stage regimen is not possible)

Diet on the eve of the day of the colonoscopy:

Breakfast according to the list of allowed products.

Before 12:00 light lunch according to the list of allowed products.

To prepare for the study, it is mandatory to take a cleaning agent of your choice Eziclen or MOVIPREP® according to the schedule below

The day before the colonoscopy:

Preparation Eziklen :

9 0002 from 17:00 to 18:00 – 500 ml of the drug solution diluted with water to take during this hour

From 18:00 to 19:00 drink 1 liter of permitted liquid (water, tea or clear juice)

From 19:00 to 20:00 — 500 ml diluted with water solution of the drug should be taken within this hour

From 20:00 to 21:00 drink 1 liter of permitted liquid

MOVIPREP® : 18:00 – sachet “A” and sachet “B” dissolve in one liter of water and take during this hour

From 18:00 to 19:00 drink 500 ml of permitted liquid (water, tea or clear juice)

From 19:00 to 20:00 – sachet ” A” and sachet “B” dissolve in one liter of water and take within this hour

From 20:00 to 21:00 drink 500 ml of the permitted liquid

At the beginning and at the end of the preparation, you need to drink two capsules of Espumizan.

Before taking all of these drugs, you must read the instructions for medical use, there are contraindications.

Important!

It is necessary to drink the entire volume of the drug and the recommended additional liquid. To facilitate taking the drug, you can drink in small sips, add ice, drink through a straw.

When conducting an examination under intravenous sedation (anesthesia), do not drink liquids and smoke 4 hours before the examination.

If you are taking life-saving medications (including blood pressure medications), you should take them on the morning of the procedure.

While taking the preparation for bowel cleansing, it is necessary to observe motor activity (walking, bending over, squats), it is not recommended to lie down and sit.

Important: bismuth, iron and activated charcoal preparations must be canceled 7 days before the procedure. If you are taking blood-thinning drugs, be sure to inform the administrator about this when registering for the study.

Two-stage regimen

Diet the day before the colonoscopy:

Breakfast according to the list of allowed foods.

Until 13:00 light lunch according to the list of allowed foods.

Dinner: only permitted liquids.

To prepare for the study, it is mandatory to take a cleaning agent of your choice Eziclen or MOVIPREP® according to the schedule below

The day before the colonoscopy:

Preparation Eziklen :

9 0002 From 17:00 to 18:00 – 500 ml of the drug solution diluted with water to take during this hour

From 18:00 to 19:00 drink 1 liter of the permitted liquid (water, tea or clear juice)

Preparation Movipop® :

from 17:00 to 18:00 – Sasha “A” and Sasha “B” dissolve in one liter of water and take

from 18:00 to 19:00 during this hour drink 500 ml of permitted liquid (water, tea or clear juice)

Day of colonoscopy:

Drug Esiclene :

From 06:00 to 07:00 – 5 Take 00 ml of the drug solution diluted with water during this hours

From 07:00 to 08:00 drink 1 liter of permitted liquid (water, tea or clear juice)

Preparation MOVIPREP® :

06:00-07:00 – sachet “A” and sachet “B” dissolve in one liter of water and take within this hour

90 002 07:00- 08:00 drink 500 ml of permitted liquid (water, tea or clear juice)

At the beginning and at the end of the preparation, you need to drink two capsules of Espumizan.

Before taking all of these drugs, you must read the instructions for medical use, there are contraindications.

Important!

It is necessary to drink the entire volume of the drug and the recommended additional liquid. To facilitate taking the drug, you can drink in small sips, add ice, drink through a straw.

Colon cleansing must be completed at least 4 hours before the start of the examination.

When conducting a study under intravenous sedation (anesthesia), do not drink liquids and smoke 4 hours before the study.

If you are taking life-saving medications (including blood pressure medications), you should take them on the morning of the procedure.

While taking bowel cleansing preparations, it is necessary to observe motor activity (walking, bending over, squatting), it is not recommended to lie down and sit.

Important: bismuth, iron and activated charcoal preparations must be canceled 7 days before the procedure. If you are taking blood-thinning drugs, be sure to inform the administrator about this when registering for the study.

One-Step Morning Schedule

Diet the day before colonoscopy:

Breakfast and lunch before 2 pm: according to the list of allowed foods.

After 14:00 only permitted liquids.

To prepare for the study, it is obligatory to take the cleaning agent Eziclen or MOVIPREP® according to the scheme below

Colonoscopy day:

No food intake on the day of the study!

Preparation Eziklen :

From 06:00 to 07:00 – take 500 ml of the drug solution diluted with water during this hour

tea or clear juice)

From 08:00 to 09:00 – take 500 ml of the drug solution diluted with water during this hour.

From 09:00 to 10:00 drink 1 liter of permitted liquid (water, tea or clear juice)

Preparation MOVIPREP® :

From 06:00 to 07:00 – sachet “A” and sachet “B” dissolve in one liter of water and take within this hour

From 07:00 until 08 :00 drink 500 ml of permitted liquid (water, tea or clear juice)

From 08:00 to 09:00 – dissolve sachet “A” and sachet “B” in one liter of water and take within this hour

From 09:00 to 10:00, drink 500 ml of permitted liquid (water, tea or clear juice)

At the beginning and at the end of the preparation, two capsules of Espumizan should be taken.