About all

Tremfya review: Tremfya Reviews & Ratings – Drugs.com

Effectiveness, Ease of Use, and Satisfaction

Show ratings & reviews for

3.6 Overall Rating

Share Your Experience

Effectiveness

Tooltip icon

See more

Ease of Use

Tooltip icon

See more

Satisfaction

Tooltip icon

See more

Most voted positive review

5 People found this comment helpful

Have Psoriasis plaque on elbows and lower legs for over 20 years. First biological i have tried. Just had third injection so now at 13 week. Completely cleared. Still see slight scaring on my lower legs but fading. No known side effects.

Shared reviews and ratings

SORT BY Condition: Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Overall rating 5.0

EffectivenessEase of UseSatisfaction

I have had severe psoriasis for over 40 years. I have tried everything from topicals, pills, injections, sun/uv and nothing helped. I debated for years before trying a biologic but finally wanted to see if I could improve my quality of life. I started Tremfya in march of 2021, exactly 8 weeks before my first scheduled vacation. To my surprise, I was able to go swimming for the first time in 40 years without embarassment! I have been completely clear for almost 2 years now with an occaisonal reminder spot usually something almost unnoticable which usually pops up generally a week or two before the next injection. It has always cleared quickly following my next injection. I have never been happier! I recently switched insurance providers (Jan 23) and was afraid I may lose coverage, but my doctor was able to get it approved! I could not live like I do today without it! Best decision I ever made!Read More Read Less

1

ShapeCreated with Sketch.thumb_up copy 5Created with Sketch.Report this post

Fill 3Created with Sketch. Condition: Psoriasis associated with Arthritis

Overall rating 5.0

EffectivenessEase of UseSatisfaction

I took tremfya and my joint paint and swelling stopped . My psoriasis cleared up . This medication has improved my quality of life.

1

ShapeCreated with Sketch.thumb_up copy 5Created with Sketch.Report this post

Fill 3Created with Sketch. Condition: Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Overall rating 4.0

EffectivenessEase of UseSatisfaction

I have used Tremfya for four years. It worked fine and I was paying five dollars per shot every two months with my Blue Cross Blue Shield plan. I am now in Medicare and have a very good prescription plan but they want over $3000 per shot every two months. I believe it is a scam to get you hooked on their shot and then charge a ridiculous price

ShapeCreated with Sketch. 1

thumb_up copy 5Created with Sketch.Report this post

Fill 3Created with Sketch. Condition: Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Overall rating 2.7

EffectivenessEase of UseSatisfaction

Switched from Siliq to Tremfya due to insurance issues. .. not by choice. Tremfya by far worst performing injection. Psoriasis spots reappeared on my legs- derm prescribed a topical. Hadn’t used topicals in years. The worst part: upper respiratory infections galore. Four in 2 months with most recent this week resulting in ear infection requiring antibiotics. Head and body aches common with Tremfya as well. Not a good medicine for me at all.

1

ShapeCreated with Sketch.thumb_up copy 5Created with Sketch.Report this post

Fill 3Created with Sketch. Condition: Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Overall rating 3.3

EffectivenessEase of UseSatisfaction

2 weeks into my first injection; seeing some very slight improvement. Some plaques have stopped “re-plaquing” , others have not changed. I seem to be itching more than usual though. Scalp plaques are starting to lift which is difficult to deal with. Side effects are very minimal, minor nausea and slight joint pain. Looking forward to more improvements with the 2nd injection.

1

ShapeCreated with Sketch.thumb_up copy 5Created with Sketch.Report this post

Fill 3Created with Sketch. Condition: Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Overall rating 2.3

EffectivenessEase of UseSatisfaction

Substantial mental side effects including paranoia and anxiety. Not a listed side effect, but effects stopped once loading dose cleared my system. Chose not to go for second dose.

3

ShapeCreated with Sketch.thumb_up copy 5Created with Sketch.Report this post

Fill 3Created with Sketch. Condition: Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Overall rating 1.0

EffectivenessEase of UseSatisfaction

I was on Stelara for over 7 years and my Dr though Tremfya would help with the area’s in my hair line that have not gone away. One shot and I was in agony! I developed migraine headache the next day that lasted for over 3 weeks. So this drug is not for me! Back on Stelara next visit.

2

ShapeCreated with Sketch.thumb_up copy 5Created with Sketch.Report this post

Fill 3Created with Sketch. Condition: Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Overall rating 2.3

EffectivenessEase of UseSatisfaction

I experienced severe thigh muscle pain during the short 2 months I was on this biologic that stopped as soon as I changed to a different med. I have been on Enbrel, Humira, cosentyx, tremfya then taltz. The muscle pain was intolerable and it hurt to walk.

2

ShapeCreated with Sketch.thumb_up copy 5Created with Sketch.Report this post

Fill 3Created with Sketch. Condition: Other

Overall rating 5.0

EffectivenessEase of UseSatisfaction 2

ShapeCreated with Sketch. 1

thumb_up copy 5Created with Sketch.Report this post

Fill 3Created with Sketch. Condition: Other

Overall rating 5.0

EffectivenessEase of UseSatisfaction

Have Psoriasis plaque on elbows and lower legs for over 20 years. First biological i have tried. Just had third injection so now at 13 week. Completely cleared. Still see slight scaring on my lower legs but fading. No known side effects.

5

ShapeCreated with Sketch. 1

thumb_up copy 5Created with Sketch.Report this post

Fill 3Created with Sketch.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT USER-GENERATED CONTENT ON WEBMD

The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions.

Read More

Tremfya® ranks highest for skin clearance for Psoriatic Arthritis patients

news

10

SHARES

Newly published Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) from Janssen indirectly compares all published Phase III data for approved treatments for adults with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).

The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson have announced a Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) comparing first-in-class interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitor Tremfya® (guselkumab) to all advanced therapies approved for active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using data from 33 Phase III randomised clinical trials (RCTs). 

The NMA concluded Tremfya ranked highest for skin clearance based on Psoriasis (PsO) Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 response among 23 treatment regimens (15 unique treatments including IL-23 inhibitors like Tremfya and risankizumab, subcutaneous [SC] tumour necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi], and Janus kinase inhibitors [JAKi]). 

In terms of joint inflammation improvement, both Tremfya dosing regimens (100mg every four weeks [q4w] and every eight weeks [q8w]) were comparable to most other treatments for the modified van der Heijde-Sharp (vdH-S) score, and Tremfya was generally comparable to TNFi and most IL-17Ai for American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response. The analysis also confirmed the established safety profile of Tremfya in active PsA. 

The NMA is being presented at the Maui Dermatology 2022 Meeting taking place between 24 – 28 January 2022. Tremfya is US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for administration as a 100mg SC injection q8w, following two initial doses at weeks 0 and 4.

An NMA is a structured, protocol-driven analytical process widely accepted and utilised by regulatory agencies, health technology assessment agencies and medical guideline committees to comparatively evaluate treatment options where head-to-head data are limited or unavailable. NMA is the most cited and the most comprehensive method available to compare studies indirectly; however, NMAs cannot replace, and should not be considered the same as, head-to-head clinical trials.

In this NMA, the timing of primary endpoint assessment varied across RCTs and placebo was used as the reference treatment throughout with the exception of two head-to-head studies.  Baseline risk adjustment was used to account for heterogeneity across study populations.

The NMA builds on previous analyses, including a 2021 publication in Rheumatology, and now incorporates all recent clinical data updates, including the COSMOS study of Tremfya in PsA patients who had an inadequate response to TNFi, as well as data for two new comparators, the IL-23i risankizumab and the JAKi upadacitinib.

NMA results:

  • Skin clearance: Tremfya ranked first and second in PASI 90 response for q4w and q8w dosing, respectively
  • Joint inflammation improvement: Tremfya was comparable to SC TNFi and most IL-17Ai, as measured by ACR20 response. While dosing frequency impacted modified vdH-S score, both Tremfya dosing regimens achieved improvements that were comparable to most treatments and both ranked more highly on vdH-S score than risankizumab and upadacitinib
  • Low numbers of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Tremfya showed low rates of SAEs, with both dosing regimens ranking favourably among the 23 treatments for low rates of events. The number of SAEs for Tremfya were consistent with its established safety profile.

“Psoriatic arthritis is a complex disease, and physicians must consider many factors when making treatment decisions, including the relative efficacy of therapies in treating both skin and joints, as well as established safety,” stated Dr Terence Rooney, Vice President, Rheumatology and Maternal-Fetal Immunology Disease Area Leader, Janssen Research & Development, LLC. “NMAs are a comprehensive, well-established approach and can provide physicians with useful information on available therapies.”

Tremfya was approved in the US for the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe plaque PsO in July 2017 and in July 2020 for adults with active PsA. The PsA approval was based on results from DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2, which showed Tremfya achieved the studies’ primary endpoint of ACR20 response at 24 weeks.

Janssen will present five additional posters at the Maui Dermatology Meeting, including the study design of APEX (NCT04882098), investigating the effect of Tremfya on radiographic progression; the design of the SOLSTICE trial (NCT04936308), which further evaluates Tremfya efficacy for PsA patients with intolerance or inadequate response to TNF therapy; evidence of molecular and genetic distinctions between patients with axial PsA (axPsA) and ankylosing spondylitis and the significant pharmacodynamic effects of Tremfya in axPsA patients; and real-world evidence for PsA patients initiating Tremfya treatment in the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis (PsA/SpA) Registry.

Related topics

Antibodies, Biologics, Clinical Trials, Drug Development, Drug Safety, Drug Targets, Research & Development (R&D), Therapeutics

27 January 2022

Shares

Related topics

Antibodies, Biologics, Clinical Trials, Drug Development, Drug Safety, Drug Targets, Research & Development (R&D), Therapeutics

Tremfya® (guselcumab) has been included in the list of Vital and Essential Drugs since 2021

Home >
Industry news >
Tremfya® (guselcumab) has been added to the list of Vital and Essential Drugs since 2021

The effectiveness of Tremfya ® is maintained for at least five years in more than 80% of patients 1 which exceeds the capabilities of existing drugs for the treatment of psoriasis 2,3,4

MOSCOW, February 4, 2021 – Janssen, a pharmaceutical division of Johnson & Johnson LLC, announces that Tremfya (guselcumab), a drug intended for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, has been included in the list of essential and essential drugs (VED) from 1 January 2021.

Psoriasis is a severe systemic disease that has a serious negative impact primarily on the quality of life of patients 5 . The most common form of psoriasis is plaque psoriasis, usually manifesting as thick, red, or inflamed skin covered in silvery scales called plaques 6 . The undulating nature of the course of the disease leads to the fact that even with the disappearance of plaques, many patients continue to live in fear of their new appearance 7 .

Guselcumab ® is a biologic agent of the interleukin 23 inhibitor class for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adult patients in whom systemic therapy is indicated 8 . Guselcumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody with low immunogenicity and a favorable safety profile. More than 80% of patients achieved and maintained near-complete skin clearance within five years of treatment with Guselcumab 9 .

“Inclusion of the drug in the list of Vital and Essential Drugs is an important step for Russian patients with severe and moderate psoriasis, since the use of guselkumab prevents the disability of young, able-bodied and socially active members of society, and also solves an important social problem for patients: it improves the quality of life and contributes to the preservation of working capacity 9,2,10,11,12,13,14,15 ,” comments Katerina Pogodina , Janssen Russia and CIS Managing Director, General Director of Johnson & Johnson LLC.

The drug was registered in Russia in August 2019. Guselcumab ® is designed to improve the quality of life of patients with severe forms of psoriasis, helping them to maintain their ability to work and social activity. It is the first biologic that selectively blocks interleukin (IL)-23, a key cytokine in the immune system’s inflammatory response in psoriasis 16,17,18 . Guselcumab therapy consists of two initiating injections at weeks 0 and 4 followed by maintenance injections once every 8 weeks 1 .

“Psoriasis is not just a skin disease, but a systemic disease that affects the state of internal organs and the nervous system as well. Due to the presence of systemic inflammation, the risk of death in such patients from cardiovascular diseases increases by 1.5 times, and the risk of developing myocardial infarction – by 3 times. The life expectancy of patients with psoriasis is on average 5-7 years less than in the general population 19.20.21 . Being one of the most effective drugs registered in Russia against psoriasis 2,6,14 , Guselkumab ® suppresses systemic inflammation, thereby reducing the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, psoriatic arthritis and subsequent disability, which improves the quality and life expectancy of patients. With the inclusion of Guselkumab in the list of vital and essential drugs, innovative therapy will become available to the largest number of patients who really need it” , – comments Konstantin Igorevich Raznatovsky , Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Chief Dermatovenereologist and Cosmetologist of the Health Committee of the Government of St. Petersburg, Chief Dermatovenereologist and Cosmetologist of the Northwestern Federal District, Head of the Department of Dermatovenereology, North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov.

Direct comparative studies have shown that Guselkumab ® outperforms current standards in the treatment of psoriasis and demonstrates high efficacy in completely and almost completely clearing the skin of psoriatic manifestations 1,2,4,16 . In addition, the use of guselcumab is not associated with the risk of oncological and cardiovascular diseases, severe opportunistic infections, as well as the reactivation of tuberculosis and the development of inflammatory bowel diseases 1 .

“The most important indicator of the effectiveness of treatment is the long-term preservation of the effect achieved and the long-term retention of patients on therapy,” the expert believes – According to the study, four years after the start of treatment, the largest proportion of patients remain on guselkumab therapy compared to drugs of previous generations. At the same time, during this time, the vast majority (84%) 22,23,24,25 patients receiving Guselcumab® maintain the achieved response, characterized by the absence of disease recurrence. It is also important to note that Guselcumab® is characterized by a favorable safety profile, which makes it possible to use it for patients with cardiovascular diseases, IBD, multiple sclerosis and latent tuberculosis, in contrast to a number of drugs of other classes 1, 26

Cost of an annual course of treatment with Tremfya ® lower or comparable to the cost of therapy with other modern GIBP 27 .

According to information for 2018, in Russia, the prevalence of psoriasis among the entire population was 242.4, the incidence was 66.5 per 100,000 population 28 . Between 2011 and 2018, the increase in the prevalence of psoriasis was 11% 6 .

# # #

About Guselcumab

0008 ® has been approved by the European Medicines Agency based on data from three phase III clinical trials 29 . The VOYAGE 1 and 2 trials comparing Guselkumab ® with placebo and Adalimumab ® showed a high level of skin clearing after just 16 weeks of therapy with a 90% reduction in the Psoria Prevalence and Severity Index value for (PASI 90) in 73.3% and 70.0% of patients treated with Guselcumab ® (p < 0.001 versus placebo) 2.3 . By week 24 of therapy, PASI 90 was achieved in 80.2% and 75.2% of patients treated with Guselcumab ® , compared with 49.7% and 46.8% of patients treated with Adalimumab ® 900 11 respectively (P < 0.001) 2.3 .

The NAVIGATE study included patients who did not achieve clear or near clear skin [IGA score of 0 or 1] by week 16 of treatment with Stelara ® (ustekinumab), and who were then switched to either guselcumab therapy or remained on ustekinumab 4 therapy. Among patients switched to guselkumab, the proportion of patients who achieved clear or near clear skin (IGA 0/1) or achieved at least a 2-point improvement in IGA score between weeks 28 and 40 (relative to week 16) was statistically significantly higher compared to the ustekinumab group (1. 5 vs. 0.7; P < 0.001) 4 .

In a head-to-head comparison study of the efficacy of guselcumab and secukinumab, the proportion of patients who achieved PASI 90 at 48 weeks of therapy was higher in the guselcumab group compared to patients treated with secukinumab (84% and 70%, respectively, p < 0.0001) 30 9001 0 .

Guselcumab’s clinical trial program for psoriasis showed no trend towards increased risk of malignancy, cardiovascular disease, or serious infections, including TB and reactivation of latent TB with the drug 2, 3 , 4 .

About Janssen, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Companies

At Janssen, we are creating a future where disease is a thing of the past. We are the Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson and we are working hard to make this future a reality for patients around the world. We defeat diseases with advanced science. Inventing how to help those who need help. We heal hopelessness with human warmth.

We work in areas of medicine where we can make the most difference: cardiovascular disease, immune-mediated and metabolic diseases, infectious diseases and vaccines, diseases of the central nervous system, oncology, pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Find out more at janssen.com. Follow: twitter.com/JanssenGlobal.


1. Griffiths et al. Poster Presentation Coastal Dermatology Symposium. 2020, October 15-16 th .

2. Blauvelt A. et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76:405-417.

3. Langley R. G. et al. Br J Dermatol 2018;178:114−123.

4. Reich, Kristianet al The Lancet. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31773-8.

5. Kerdel F. The Importance of Early Treatment in Psoriasis and Management of Disease Progression. J Drugs Dermatol . 2018;17(7):737–742.

6. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Disorders. NIH Medline Plus. 2003;12(1):20–21.

7. US Food and Drug Administration. 2016. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/UCM529856.pdf. Accessed January 2021.

8. State Register of Medicines [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid=06e7fa3a-e993-4bad-aa90-f28b2de029d3&t= The link is active as of 02/03/2021.

9. Reich K. et al. Presented at EADV 2017. Poster P1796.

10. Munir F. et al. Occup Med 2008; 58: 310–311 2. Blauvelt A, et al . J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76:405−417

11. Griffiths C.E.M. et al. Presented at EADV 2017, Geneva, Switzerland

12. Griffiths C.E.M. et al. J Drugs Dermatol 2018;17:826–832

13. Griffiths C.E.M. et al. Presented at Fall Clinical Dermatology. Las Vegas: United States of America; 2018.

14. Reich K. et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76:418-431.

15. Langley R. G. et al . Br J Dermatol 2018;178:114–123.

16. Blauvelt A., Papp K. A. et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76(3):405–417.

17. Reich K and Armstrong A.W et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76(3):418–431.

18. Puig L. Guselkumab for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol . 2019;15(6):589–597.

19. Fernández-Armenteros J. M. et al. J EurAcadDermatolVenereol. June 28, 2018. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15159.

20. Mehta N. et al. Am J Med. 2011;124:775e1–6.

21. Ahlehoff O. et al. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2054–64.

22. Augustin M, et al. EADV 2020 P1299

23. Warren RB, Smith CH, Yiu ZZN J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(11):2632–2640

24. Egeberg A, Bryld LE, Skov L. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(1):173–178

25. Griffiths C.E.M., et al. Fall Clinical Dermatology Conference; October 17-20, 2019

0003

State Register of Maximum Selling Prices. Electronic resource: https://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/pricelims.aspx Access date 25.01.21

28. Kubanov A. A., Bogdanova E. V. Organization and results of medical care in the field of “dermatovenereology” in the Russian Federation. Results of 2018. Journal of Dermatology and Venereology . 2019;95(4):8–23.

29. The European Medicines Agency (EMA). [Electronic resource] Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/smop/chmp-post-authorisation-summary-positive-opinion-tremfya-ii-17_en.pdf. Accessed: 02/03/2021.

30. Reich K., Armstrong A. W., Langley R. G. et al. Guselkumab versus secukinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (ECLIPSE): results from a phase 3, randomized controlled trial. Lancet . 2019;394(10201):831–839. 394. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31773-8.

ISSN 2305-2066 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5049 (Online)

Tremfya (guselcumab) for the treatment of moderate and severe plaque psoriasis was included in the lists of Vital and Essential Drugs and ONLS

Home >
News >
Tremfya (guselcumab) for the treatment of moderate and severe plaque psoriasis was included in the lists of vital and essential drugs and ONLS

This is the first biologic that selectively blocks interleukin (IL)-23, a key cytokine in the immune system’s inflammatory response in psoriasis. Guselcumab therapy consists of two initiating injections at weeks 0 and 4 followed by maintenance injections once every 8 weeks.
“The inclusion of guselcumab in the list of essential drugs is an important event for Russian patients with severe and moderate psoriasis who are indicated for systemic therapy. We hope that the drug will now be available to the largest number of patients for whom it can bring the maximum benefit. The decision of the commission of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation to include the drug in the list guarantees patients to receive this innovative and effective therapy, which is necessary to improve their quality of life, as part of the list of vital and essential drugs (VED) and the list of drugs for certain categories of citizens (ONLS). The decision of the commission once again confirmed that our drug shows clinically significant results, is characterized by a favorable safety profile and is necessary for Russian patients,” comments Katerina Pogodina, Managing Director of Janssen Russia and the CIS, General Director of Johnson & Johnson LLC.

According to information for 2018, in Russia, the prevalence of psoriasis among the entire population was 242.4, the incidence was 66.5 per 100 thousand population [1]. Between 2011 and 2018, the increase in the prevalence of psoriasis was 11%.
“Guselcumab has already established itself as a drug with a clinically significant result in the fight for a high quality of life in patients with psoriasis, this severe, disabling, socially significant disease. Thanks to guselcumab therapy, a high level of skin cleansing is achieved, the area of ​​damage and the severity of psoriasis are significantly reduced, and the quality of life is significantly improved both in bionaive patients and in patients with insufficient effectiveness of previous therapy with genetically engineered biological preparations [2]. The effectiveness of the drug is maintained for at least 4 years in more than 80% of patients [3]. The use of Guselcumab is not associated with an increased risk of oncological and cardiovascular diseases, severe opportunistic infections and reactivation of tuberculosis, and the development of inflammatory bowel diseases. Now that the drug has been recommended by the commission of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation for inclusion in the lists of vital and essential drugs and ONLS, patients can count on a broad provision of effective treatment, the therapeutic response to which persists for a long time, ”comments Nikolai Nikolaevich Potekaev, chief freelance specialist in dermatovenereology and cosmetology of the Ministry of Health of Russia, director of the Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology of the Moscow Health Department, head of the department skin diseases and cosmetology N.I. Pirogov of the Ministry of Health of Russia”, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor.

About Guselcumab
In 2017, Tremfya was approved by the European Medicines Agency based on data from three Phase III clinical trials [4]. The VOYAGE 1 and 2 trials, which compared guselcumab with placebo and adalimumab, showed a high level of skin clearing after 16 weeks of
treatments with a 90% reduction in the Psoriasis Prevalence and Severity Index (PASI 90) score in 73. 3% and 70.0% of patients treated with guselcumab (compared to placebo). By week 24 of therapy, PASI 90 was observed in 80.2% and 75.2% of patients treated with guselkumab compared with 49.7% and 46.8% of patients treated with adalimumab, respectively. The stable result of therapy with guselcumab persists for a long time: after 3 years, 97.4% of patients have a response according to the PASI 75 index (significant skin cleansing) [5].
The NAVIGATE study included patients who did not achieve clear or near clear skin (IGA score of 0 or 1) by week 16 of treatment with Stelara® (ustekinumab) and who were then switched to either guselkumab or remained on ustekinumab. Among patients switched to guselkumab therapy, the proportion of patients who achieved complete or near complete skin clearance (IGA 0/1) or achieved at least a 2-point improvement in the IGA score between weeks 28 and 40 (relative to week 16) was statistically significantly greater compared to the ustekinumab group (1.5 vs 0. 7).
In a head-to-head comparison study of the efficacy of guselcumab and secukinumab, it was shown that the proportion of patients who achieved PASI 90 at 48 weeks from the start of therapy was higher in the guselcumab group compared with patients treated with secukinumab (84% and 70%, respectively) [6].
Guselcumab’s psoriasis clinical trial program did not show clear evidence of an increased risk of malignant neoplasms, cardiovascular disease, or serious infections, including tuberculosis and reactivation of latent tuberculosis, while taking the drug.

Links

  1. Kubanov A. A., Bogdanova E. V. Organization and results of medical care in the field of “dermatovenereology” in the Russian Federation. Results of 2018. Bulletin of dermatology and venereology. 2019;95(4):8–23.
  2. C.E.M. Griffith et al. Clinical response after guselkumab treatment among adalimumab PASI 90 nonresponders: Results from the VOYAGE 1 and 2 trials Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Volume 79, Issue 3, AB78
  3. Griffiths C.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *