The Most Toxic, Worst Candy You Should Never Eat — Eat This Not That

Oh, candy. It’s truly a sweet treat that brings on all the nostalgia, reminding you of the days when you would fill with excitement at finding a piece in your lunchbox. And while having a piece of candy here or there once in a while is harmless for the most part, there are just some candies you shouldn’t even bother ever having in your snack drawer. One piece can quickly turn into many pieces and you don’t need these little diet-derailers around.

But which candies are truly the worst of the worst? Well, we rounded up the candies that are simply major sugar bombs you are better off avoiding at all costs. It’s no secret that a diet that is high in sugar can lead to many health issues such as diabetes, obesity, heart disease, depression, and even cancer. These candies aren’t worth any of that!

Read on to uncover the most toxic candies out there, and be sure to check out the 21 Best Healthy Cooking Hacks of All Time so you can make your own meals at home, the right way.

Per bag: 210 calories, 0 g fat, 50 mg sodium, 51 g carbs (44 g sugar), 0 g protein

Anyone who has ever eaten a Sour Patch Kid knows it’s nearly impossible to just eat one or two—they’re sour, then they’re sweet. Who can resist? But one small bag is packing 44 grams of the sweet stuff. That’s more sugar in one sitting than you would get if you ate four Original Glazed Krispy Kreme donuts.

It’s no secret that candy really doesn’t provide any nutritional value to your daily diet and its biggest offender is added sugar, as it’s been linked to an increased risk of heart disease, among its many scary qualities.

Shutterstock

Per package: 250 calories, 2.5 g fat (2.5 g saturated fat, 0 g trans fat), 20 mg sodium, 56 g carbs (0 g fiber, 45 g sugar), 0 g protein

One pack of Skittles and you’re consuming 250 calories and 45 grams of sugar. These bite-sized candies are too easy to mindlessly eat, especially if you have a bag in front of you while you’re working at your computer or watching TV. The first two ingredients are sugar and corn syrup, and it contains just about every artificial food coloring you can think of. Yes, we’re talking Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 2, to name a few. Just say no!

Need more proof there is nothing redeeming about candy? Well, here’s exactly what happens to your body when you eat too much candy.

Shutterstock

Per serving: 160 calories, 3 g fat (3 g saturated fat, 0 g trans fat), 0 mg sodium, 34 g carbs (0 g fiber, 22 g sugar), 0 g protein

When you munch on Starbursts, you’re not only ingesting corn syrup and sugar but hydrogenated palm kernel oil, the third item on the ingredients list after all that sweet stuff. It’s a greasy substance that actually adds to the fat count. If you’re in the mood for a colorful, sweet snack, why not just eat actual fruit instead?

Looking for more helpful tips? Your ultimate restaurant and supermarket survival guide is here!

Per serving: 120 calories, 1 g fat (1 g saturated fat), 0 mg sodium, 26 g carbs (20 g sugar), 0 g protein

If something has a mystery flavor so you don’t know what you’re eating, that’s already reason enough to stay away. And that’s what you should do—skip the chewy Airheads.

Per serving: 110 calories, 0 g fat (0 g saturated fat, 0 g trans fat), 10 mg sodium, 27 g carbs (0 g fiber, 18 g sugar), 0 g protein

Each box contains more than four servings in it, so keep that in mind when you’re doing the math on the amount of sugar you would be consuming here. And although overall, this candy seems not that bad, eating something that is devoid of everything isn’t ideal either. There is no fiber or protein, so soon enough, you’ll be reaching for more food.

Shutterstock

Per serving: 130 calories, 2.5 g fat (1.5 g saturated fat), 0 mg sodium, 26 g carbs (25 g sugar), 0 g protein

One serving of these poppable treats is 12 pieces, and if you’ve ever had a Junior Mint before, you know how tiny these are. So soon enough, you’ll be stuffing yourself with a ton of sugar and calories, especially if you happen to eat these along with some buttered, movie theater-style popcorn for that salty/sweet mix. 6254a4d1642c605c54bf1cab17d50f1e

Per serving: 70 calories, 0 g fat (0 g saturated fat, 0 g trans fat), 0 mg sodium, 17 g carbs (0 g fiber, 11 g sugar), 0 g protein

While Jolly Rancher’s nutrition breakdown might seem not that terrible compared to others on this list, don’t let that first glance fool you. Keep in mind this is just for three pieces, which is what’s considered one serving. The first three ingredients for these candies are corn syrup, sugar, and some malic acid for that tangy (artificial!) flavor. No thanks!

Per bar: 240 calories, 7 g fat (5 g saturated fat), 95 mg sodium, 42 g carbs (<1 g fiber, 36 g sugar), 1 g protein

So we know this a chocolate bar, but it’s still obviously candy. Since it came in as the worst candy bar ever in our ranking, we’re going to remind you that this milk chocolate bar is nothing but bad news. One bar knocks you back 240 calories and has 36 grams of sugar. It’s no wonder it lands a spot on our list of the sugariest foods in America, too. Plus, a study in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that the one food associated with the highest energy density—aka the most with weight gain—was chocolate bars. Yikes!

RANKING: the Unhealthiest Halloween Candy

RANKING: the Unhealthiest Halloween Candy

Jump to

1. Main content
2. Search
3. Account

Search iconA magnifying glass. It indicates, “Click to perform a search”.

Chevron iconIt indicates an expandable section or menu, or sometimes previous / next navigation options. HOMEPAGE

Health

Save Article IconA bookmarkShare iconAn curved arrow pointing right.
Read in app

Halloween candy tempts even the healthiest eaters.

Wikimedia Commons/ Wikimedia Commons/ Flickr/Daniel Rothamel

Indulging in your favorite Halloween treats isn’t the end of the world, but some candies are ridiculously disproportionate when it comes to nutrition content. And, if you’re a health-conscious person with a sweet tooth, you might want to know what candy is “healthier” than others. 

INSIDER spoke with registered dietitian Lisa DeFazio about how best to rank the sweets. She agreed that the sugar, calories, and fat are the best numbers to look at to determine how “healthy” these candies are.

We then compared the information for one serving size of either the fun, snack, or mini size available for each of your favorite treats. You would be surprised at how many brands have multiple pieces of candy for one serving, so be sure to check the labels on your favorites. The nutritional information was based on the company’s official website or off of the nutrition labeling we found for the products sold online or in stores. It’s also important to note that this ranking doesn’t consider other relevant factors like sodium and fiber. 

When it comes to making the healthiest candy choices, DeFazio recommended going for the hard candies that tend to have low to no fat, instead of choices with higher fat content, like chocolate. 

“Overall, candy is candy,” she said. “When we are looking at candy they are all going to have sugar, so you can’t really categorize candy by sugar because it is going to be a negligible difference. You’ll do less damage with the stuff that has less total fat.” 

That said, her personal favorites are chocolate bars — Snickers and 3 Musketeers, to be specific. 

See where your favorites rank — based on fat, sugar, and calories — below.  

Smarties

Smarties: 25 calories, 6 grams of sugar, 0 grams of total fat

Wikimedia Commons

Smarties might be the smartest candy choice to indulge in this Halloween. DeFazio says that this is because they are “straight sugar” and they don’t contain any saturated fat. There is also the added fact that they are low in calories and are gluten, dairy, and peanut-free, according to the official website.  

Tootsie Pops

Classic Tootsie Pop: 60 calories, 11 grams of sugar, 0 grams of total fat

Wikimedia Commons

“Lollipops and Tootsie Pops are good because they take a lot of time to eat,” DeFazio said about these treats. She also mentioned that there are under 100 calories in a serving which adds up to less “damage” nutritionally. 

“It’s really about what’s going to do the least amount of damage in the least amount of time that you are consuming it,” she said. “In 20 minutes you can go through five or 10 mini chocolate bars and be 1000 calories in, that’s why the lollipops are good.” 

Sour Patch Kids

Treat Size Sour Patch Kids: 120 calories, 22 grams of sugar, 0 grams of total fat

atlnav/Flickr

Before Sour Patch Kids were kids, they were martians. According to MentalFloss, the candy was originally called Mars Men in the late 1970s but changed after the product came to the US. 

Kids and aliens alike should consider eating this candy before other chocolate sweets, according to DeFazio. This, again, is because of the low fat and calorie content. 

Airheads

Airheads Mini Bars: 140 calories, 19 grams of sugar, 1.5 grams of total fat

Jasmin Fine/ Flickr

Only airheads would skip out on these candies. DeFazio said that although these are higher in calories, they are nutritionally sound options with low fat. There are also eight flavor options to ward of taste boredom. When the candies were first released, however, there was only one flavor option — red. People couldn’t agree that the flavor was either cherry or strawberry, The Daily Meal reported. 

Laffy Taffy

Laffy Taffy Mini Bar: 140 calories, 19 grams of sugar, 2 grams of total fat

Jasmin Fine/Flickr

Laffy Taffy was brought to life with the help of a few people. The first was the author of “Charlie and The Chocolate Factory” Roald Dahl, the second was Quaker Oats who helped finance the film version of the book to create the accompanying real-life candy line, Mental Floss reports. Laffy Taffy is just one candy that has been brought to life from Willy Wonka’s imagination. Nestle, which currently owns the Wonka brand, makes over 13 different Wonka-inspired sweets, according to the official website.

Starburst

Mini Pack Starburst Original: 150 calories, 28 grams of sugar, 2 grams of total fat

Wesley Fryer/Flickr

Starburst is owned by Wrigley, the home of another candy on this list — Skittles. According to the Wrigley website, Starburst was initially called Opal Fruits when it debuted in the UK. There were only four flavors when Opal Fruits was introduced, and now, Starburst has tons of other products and flavors including jelly beans and gummibursts. 

Nutritionally, although Starburst has a lot of sugar, DeFazio said that the low-fat content still makes them a better option compared to chocolate candies — no matter what version of the sweet you eat. 

Tootsie Rolls

Tootsie Roll Snack Bar: 120 calories, 17 grams of sugar, 2.5 grams of total fat

CandyWarehouse/Tootsie Roll

Tootsie rolls are very low in fat but high in sugar. For World War II soldiers, this sugar rush gave them energy. Mental Floss reports that the candy rolls were in every World War II soldier’s rations because they wouldn’t melt or go bad over time.  

Brach’s Candy Corn

Brach’s Candy Corn Treat Packs: 150 calories, 31 grams of sugar, 0 grams of total fat

Wikimedia Commons

Candy corn is a polarizing Halloween candy — people either love them, or they hate them. Even so, USAToday reports that more than 9 billion kernels of candy corn are sold every year. DeFazio ranked this classic Halloween candy as one of the last “better candies” on the list. This is because the tiny treats are high in sugar and calories, but still low in fat. 

Skittles

Fun Size Skittles: 190 calories, 34 grams of sugar, 2 grams of total fat

Wikipedia Commons

Skittles were ranked by DeFazio as one of the worst non-chocolate candy options. Not only are they high in calories and sugar, but they also have more fat than other candies. 

Livestrong reported, however, that Skittles also have a surprisingly high amount of vitamin C. This probably has nothing to do with the fact that Skittles are the second most popular chewy candy in America, according to The Daily Meal. This shows that nutrition really doesn’t sway people from indulging in their favorite sweets. 

Kit Kat

Snack Size Kit Kat: 140 calories, 14 grams of sugar, 7 grams of total fat

slgckgc/Flickr

DeFazio said that Kit Kat candies are ones that will add up quickly due to their addictive qualities.

“When you are eating candy you can’t stop at one, that’s the problem when you start with a chocolate bar, it’s like chess, and chemically your body gets these serotonins and dopamines,” she said. “There is a chemical thing going on so if you don’t want to end up eating five or 10 then don’t start.” 

Kit Kat candies are so popular and addictive that there are more than 200 flavors in Japan and tons of unique variations on the original treat in the Middle East and the Philippines, according to Mental Floss. 

Milky Way

Fun Size Milky Way: 160 calories, 21 grams of sugar, 6 grams of total fat

Milky Way/Amazon

Milky Way candies have less fat and sugar compared to other sweets on this list, according to DeFazio, who ranked them after Reese’s and Kit Kat bars.

According to Shape, however, they are the “hands-down” best healthy chocolate-bar splurge. This is partly because of the serving size. Back in the day, the bar was more than three ounces, Mental Floss reports, almost double of what a regular size bar is today. 

Butterfinger

Fun Size Butterfinger: 170 calories, 17 grams of sugar, 7 grams of total fat

Dat Nguyen/Flickr

DeFazio noted that Butterfinger and Milky Way candies are similar from a nutrition standpoint. One thing Butterfinger has that Milky Way doesn’t is a partnership with Bart Simpson. According to The Daily Meal, Butterfinger worked with “The Simpsons” from 1998 until 2001 and again in 2013. 

Baby Ruth

Fun Size Baby Ruth: 170 calories, 20 grams of sugar, 8 grams of total fat

Nestle/Amazon

Although the nutritional content of Baby Ruth bars isn’t that different from others on this list, it was named one of the most influential candy bars of all time by Time. The creators of the bar claimed it was named after the current president’s daughter Ruth, but the most obvious association is with the Yankees star Babe Ruth. 

3 Musketeers

Snack Size 3 Musketeers: 190 calories, 30 grams of sugar, 6 grams of total fat

3 Musketeers

3 Musketeers bars may be the most straightforward sounding candy on this list, with a whipped chocolate center and chocolate coating, but they initially came in three flavors. And yes, that’s why it was called a 3Musketeers bar. According to The Daily Meal, the original flavors were chocolate, vanilla, and strawberry. Rationing during World War II led to the flavors being widdled down to just the chocolate. 

M&M’S

Fun Size Plain M&M’S: 190 calories, 26 grams of sugar, 7 grams of total fat

livininoblivion/Flickr

There are six different colored regular M&M’S, and only so many pieces come in one Fun Size candy pack.  

DeFazio noted to be aware of how many pieces of candy come in packs like M&M’S since some types may have more pieces per serving. 

“People will say to eat 8oz of candy, but people don’t know what that is and when they see the actual serving size it’s a whole different ball game.” 

Snickers

Fun Size Snickers: 160 calories, 17 grams of sugar, 8 grams of total fat

Pixabay

DeFazio said that Snickers are one of the worst chocolates due to the high amount of sugar, calories, and fat. But that doesn’t stop people from indulging in the candy. They are considered a staple candy due to the combination of chocolate, peanuts, and caramel. This is what Time called the “holy trinity of confection.” The publication also listed the candy as one of the most influential bars of all time. 

Almond Joy

Snack Size Almond Joy: 160 calories, 16 grams of sugar, 9 grams of total fat

Wikipedia Commons

Almond Joy candies are very similar to Snickers nutritionally but have a slightly higher fat content. Greatist reported that Almond Joy has an extra dose of fiber and unsaturated fat thanks to the almond center. The Hershey brand, which creates Almond Joy candies, is the largest buyer of almonds in North America, according to Mental Floss. 

Raisinets

Fun Size Raisinets: 203 calories, 28 grams of sugar, 8.2 grams of total fat

Pixnio

Raisinets are very high in calories and sugar but have less fat than other candies on this list. DeFazio said that the good news is you get a serving of fruit with this candy too. Greatist reports, however, that you can make this treat healthier by going for the dark chocolate variety instead. There are also other varieties including chocolate covered cherries and cranberries, according to the official website. 

Nestlé Crunch

Fun Size Nestlé Crunch: 190 calories, 21 grams of sugar, 9 grams of total fat

Crunch/Amazon

Crunch bars are one of the highest calorie and sugar options on this list, even though one of the main ingredients is puffed rice. Time reported that this bar is one of the most influential because it introduced a cheaper and unique chocolate bar filling. 

Peanut M&M’S

Fun Size M&M’S Peanut: 180 calories, 18 grams of sugar, 10 grams of total fat

Wikimedia Commons

Although Peanut M&M’S have fewer calories than a Crunch bar, they also have two more grams of fat. Again, keep in mind how many pieces are in a package when deciding between candies to indulge in.

The creator of Peanut M&M’S, Forrest Mars, would have passed on these chocolate bites because he was actually allergic to peanuts, MentalFloss reports. 

Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups

Snack Size Reese’s Cups: 220 calories, 22 grams of sugar, 13 grams of total fat

Pixabay

“Who stops at one peanut butter cup,” DeFazio asked. “You can easily eat up to 45 grams of fat and 800 calories with these. ” 

People who can limit their Reeses consumption to one cup missed out on a great candy deal back when the product was first released in the 1930s. Reeses were originally called penny cups, according to Teen Vogue, because they retailed for only 1¢. 

Twix

Fun Size Twix: 250 calories, 17 grams of sugar, 14 grams of total fat

Max Pixel

Fun Size Twix bars not only have the highest calories, but the highest amount of fat, which is why DeFazio ranked this candy last. Whether you are team right cookie or left cookie, they both have the same nutritional value. The name Twix actually comes from “Twin Bix” a play on words for the bar’s double cookie packaging, The Daily Meal reports.  

Read next

LoadingSomething is loading.

Thanks for signing up!

Access your favorite topics in a personalized feed while you’re on the go.

Features
Nutrition
Evergreen story

More. ..

The most toxic and worst candy you shouldn’t eat

The most toxic and worst candy you shouldn’t eat – Healthy Eating

Calorie calculator

Gender:

Age:

Height (in cm):

Weight (in kg):

Physical activity level:
Minimum Low Average High Very high

The most toxic candy you shouldn’t eat

Healthy Eating

Oh, sweets. It’s a truly sweet treat that evokes all the nostalgia, reminding you of the days when you felt the excitement of finding a piece. in your lunchbox. And while candy here and there is mostly harmless from time to time, there are just a few candies that you shouldn’t even put in your snack box. One bite can quickly turn into many bites, and you don’t need those little diets.

But which candies are really the worst of the worst? Well, we’ve rounded up candies that are just big sugar bombs that are best avoided at all costs. It’s no secret that a diet high in sugar can lead to a host of health problems, such as diabetes, obesity, heart disease, depression, and even cancer. These candies are worth nothing!

Read on for the most toxic candies, and be sure to check out the 21 Best Healthy Cooking Recipes of All Time so you can cook your own meals at home the right way.

1

Sour Patch Kids

Per bag: 210 calories, 0g fat, 50mg sodium, 51g carbs (44g sugar), 0g protein.

Anyone who has ever eaten a Sour Patch Kid knows that it is almost impossible to eat one or two – they are sour and then sweet. Who can resist? But in one small bag there are only 44 grams of sweet. It’s no secret that candy really doesn’t provide any nutritional value in your daily diet, and their main offender is added sugar, as it has been linked to an increased risk of heart disease, among its many scary qualities.

2

Skittles

Shutterstock Per Package: 250 calories, 2.5g fat (2.5g saturated fat, 0g trans fat), 20mg sodium, 56g carbs (0g fiber, 45g sugar), 0 g protein.

One pack of Skittles and you consume 250 calories and 45 grams of sugar. These little candies are all too easy to eat mindlessly, especially if you have a bag in front of you while you work at your computer or watch TV. The first two ingredients are sugar and corn syrup, and it contains just about every artificial food coloring you can think of. Yes, we are talking about Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 2 and many more. Just say no!

Need more proof that candy is not healthy? Well, here’s what happens to your body when you eat too much candy.

3

Starburst

Shutterstock Per Serving: 160 calories, 3g fat (3g saturated fat, 0g trans fat), 0mg sodium, 34g carbs (0g fiber, 22g sugar), 0g protein .

When you eat Starbursts, you’re not only eating corn syrup and sugar, but also hydrogenated palm kernel oil, third on the ingredient list after all that sugar. This is a fatty substance that increases the amount of fat. If you’re in the mood for a colorful, sweet snack, why not just eat real fruit instead?

Looking for more helpful tips? Your guide to survival in restaurants and supermarkets is here!

4

Airheads

Per serving: 130 calories, 1g fat (5g saturated fat), 5mg sodium, 30g carbs (21g sugar), 0g protein.

If something has a mysterious taste so you don’t know what you’re eating, that’s good enough to stay away. And that’s what you should do – skip chewable Airheads.

5

Mike & Ike

Per serving: 110 calories, 0 g fat (0 g saturated fat, 0 g trans fat), 10 mg sodium, 27 g carbohydrates (0 g fiber, 18 g sugar), 0 g protein.

Each box contains more than four servings, so keep that in mind when you calculate the amount of sugar you consume here. And while this candy doesn’t seem all that bad overall, eating something stripped of everything isn’t ideal either. There’s no fiber or protein here, so soon enough you’ll be reaching for food.

6

Junior Mints

Shutterstock Per serving: 130 calories, 2.5 g fat (1.5 g saturated fat), 0 mg sodium, 26 g carbohydrates (25 g sugar), 0 g protein.

One serving of these tasty treats is 12 pieces, and if you’ve ever tried Junior Mint before, you know how tiny they are. Soon enough, you’ll be stuffing yourself with a ton of sugar and calories, especially if you happen to eat them along with cinema-style popcorn butter. salty/sweet mix.

7

Jolly Ranchers

Per Serving: 70 calories, 0 g fat (0 g saturated fat, 0 g trans fat), 0 mg sodium, 17 g carbohydrates (0 g fiber, 11 g sugar), 0 g squirrel.

While Jolly Rancher’s eating disorder may not sound like much of a problem compared to others on this list, don’t let this first look fool you. Keep in mind that these are just three pieces, which counts as one serving. The first three ingredients for these candies are corn syrup, sugar, and some malic acid for a spicy (artificial!) taste. No thanks!

8

3 Musketeers

For bars: 240 calories, 7g fat (5g saturated fat), 95mg sodium, 42g carbs (So we know it’s a chocolate bar, but it’s obviously candy. Because it came in as the worst chocolate bar in our ranking, we remind you that this milk chocolate bar is nothing but bad news.One bar drops 240 calories and contains 36 grams of sugar.No wonder it made it to our list of the sweetest foods in America, too!Plus study at The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that the single food associated with the highest energy density—namely, weight gain—is chocolate bars. Oh!
Seal

Previous Article

These people need a COVID test now, says Dr. Fauci.

Next article

These new Starbucks drinks are full of real fruit

What affects the expiration date of artisan sweets?

Expiry dates are a hot topic in the chocolate industry. How long can candy be stored?
How to maintain taste, shape, consistency, correct microbiology and slow down a range of chemical
processes that reduce the quality of sweets during storage are the main problems that will be faced
chocolatier always.

Why?

Mistakes are costly. Search for successful flavor combinations, marketing research, study of the target
audiences, advertising campaigns – all this will be a waste of time if your loyal customer,
having bitten another truffle, he will find, say, mold in it. And the reasons for its sudden appearance may be
a lot of.

The shelf life of sweets depends not only on the ratio of certain ingredients in the recipe, but also on
manufacturing technology, compliance with sanitary and hygienic norms and rules in the workshop, regardless of
the scale of your production, whether it is a large factory or a home kitchen.

The bad news: in this material we do not give clear formulas that will help you accurately calculate the timing
storage for any recipe – they simply do not exist. The good news is that
some things can be measured and planned. Therefore, today we will talk about what data helps
predict expiration dates, what factors lead to spoilage of sweets and how to reduce or avoid them altogether
their influence.

What can happen to sweets during storage?

Let’s start the horror stories with microbiological spoilage. It sounds, of course, like a magical superstition, but, if without jokes,
then this is the most basic and most dangerous factor for the human body, which can be accompanied
the formation of toxins and the development of pathogenic bacteria. Favorable conditions for the development of bacteria,
mold, yeast is water, air, a comfortable temperature and a source of nutrition. In our case, herself
candy.

White coating is mold. Bue…

The most obvious sign that the candy has gone bad is mold. Many mistakenly believe that
if the truffle is not covered with mold, then you should not worry, and everything is in order with it. And there are even more
desperate optimists who simply cut off a moldy piece and think that from now on the product will
security. Unfortunately, such optimism can lead to poisoning, since mold lives not only on
surface, but also penetrates into the product.

Violation of microbiology is not always accompanied by signs visible to the eye. Moreover, in addition to
microbiological deterioration, there are a number of other degradation processes that are invisible to the eye. For example, chemical
processes – different types of oxidation, to a greater extent associated with fats. Externally, such damage, as a rule,
does not manifest itself in any way, but you can feel a rancid or simply unpleasant aftertaste that is not characteristic of
product. Surely there are few of you who are ready to give a second chance to a nut butter or a chocolate bar with
rancid nut flavor. You are unlikely to go to Rospotrebnadzor with a complaint, but here are the products of such
manufacturer obviously no longer buy.

Damage can also occur as a result of a number of physical influences: mechanical damage,
deformation or loss of integrity. It sounds quite harmless when compared with the types of damage described above,
but here it is important to note that according to the current legislation (Article 5 of the Law of the Russian Federation of February 7, 1992 N 2300-1 “On the protection of the rights
consumers”), the shelf life of the product is determined by the manufacturer, who guarantees that in
within the period declared by him, subject to the storage conditions indicated by him, the product will be safe
for health and will retain not only its taste, but also its appearance. Therefore, deformations, various kinds of graying
and damage is also not allowed. In addition, physical processes can easily and without warning
“pass the baton” to chemical or microbiological processes.

Fat bloom of chocolate.

Deformation, by the way, is not always the result of
mechanical damage – the candy can be deformed as a result of drying out. Wet fillings have
property to dry out, due to which its consistency begins to change, grains of sugar appear, it loses its
silkiness, becomes rough, roughness appears, and the candy itself changes its appearance – it is deformed.
In this case, voids appear between the filling and the chocolate layer, which create excellent conditions for
development of microorganisms, that is, the “elements” mentioned above – air, temperature and water. Air influence
can be reduced by glazing the filling in chocolate, which will serve as a protective layer for it (which is why
it is important that the layer is complete, without cracks and holes). At the same time, the filling itself should also be inside without
air bubbles that can form when whipping ganache with a blender. This can be avoided if
keep the blender immersed in the mass while whipping. Of course, the most reliable protection against air is
vacuum, but let’s face it: few people will vacuum candy after opening the package,
therefore, it is better to proceed from reality and protect the product in other ways. It is even easier with temperature – it
should be reduced, i.e. ideally store candies in the refrigerator to prevent microorganisms
feel good and develop quickly. But what about the last “element”? Let’s figure it out…

How can I extend the shelf life of sweets containing water?

Yes, unfortunately, it is the presence of water in the composition of the filling that is the main factor that significantly
reduces the shelf life of candy. Therefore, emulsion fillings spoil the fastest, that is, so gently
our favorite ganache on cream, fruit puree, juice or just water. And the more water, the shorter the time
validity.

Factory-made sweets can lie on the shelves of supermarkets without any special temperature conditions in
for a long time – from 6 months to 1 year, and some types of ducks generally up to three years. What are their
secret? The fact that the main ingredients of sweets from the supermarket are sugar and fat. This composition guarantees
no problems with microbiology, since there is no water in the composition, and with the right ratio of ingredients
and the addition of antioxidants can slow down chemical processes as much as possible.

The composition of factory candies leaves much to be desired.

So, don’t rush to “pump out” the water from the candies! The point is that it is
it provides such a tender, smooth, melting filling consistency that cannot be created from sugars and
fats. By reducing the amount of water and increasing the content of sugar and fat in the composition, we certainly increase
shelf life, but in the end, the craft product loses its attractiveness, which lies in the special
texture, balance of taste and aroma, moderate sugar content and approaches the quality of the mass market.

Included
fillings, we are not worried about all the water, but only the so-called “free” – that which is not connected with others
substances. From here, pardon the pun, the concept of “water activity” follows, denoted by the abbreviation
aW (water activity). The more free, unbound water, the more opportunities for
the development of various kinds of bacteria, yeast and mold, which means that the shelf life of the filling becomes shorter.

Water activity is measurable. For this, there are special devices – water analyzers (aW-meters).
They allow you to calculate the free water in the filling. Expressed as aW as a number between 0 and 1, where water
will have an activity value of 1, and the driest product will tend to a value of 0. To calculate the active
water in the fillings, you can use the special Pro-Choc program or the Ganache Solution charts.

Why do you need to know all these numbers? In order to predict the shelf life of the candy. For example,
a candy with aW 0.7–0.75 is more likely to retain all its properties for 60 days when
following a number of conditions: storage temperature 10-13ºC, relative humidity about 70-75%, in tightly
closed packaging away from sources of heat, light and strong odors.

There is another important “water” nuance that concerns the storage of sweets: active water is closely related to
concept of equilibrium humidity. This means that the filling will give or take moisture until its level
aW will not be in equilibrium with the environment. In a very humid room, the filling will begin to absorb moisture,
which will lead to the appearance of free water, which will disrupt the stability of the filling and serve as a favorable base
for the development of microorganisms. In a room that is too dry, the filling will give off moisture and dry out, and its
the consistency will become rough due to the crystallization of sugar, as we wrote earlier. Sugar dissolved in water
tends to crystallize back. Surely many of you have experienced this during
syrup preparation: after complete dissolution in water, at some point, sugar begins to actively collect in
crystals that don’t want to dissolve. This is due to the fact that during boiling, moisture
evaporates so much that it is not enough to keep the sugar in solution. To avoid back
crystallization, in fillings, syrups and other substances where there are sugars, glucose syrup is added, which
has anti-crystallization properties. If the relative humidity level in the room is 65-70%, then
stuffing with aW of about 0.